Is membrane sweeping beneficial at the initiation of labor induction?

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether cervical membrane sweeping during labor induction is beneficial.

Methods: Outcomes of labor after induction in pregnant women at term were compared in a randomized trial. Women were assigned to having their membranes “swept” or “not swept” at the initiation of labor induction.

Results: We recruited a total of 870 women of which 70 were excluded. There were 400 nullipara (Group A) [198 “swept”, 202 “not swept”] and 400 multiparas (Group B) (201 “swept” and 199 “not swept”]. Among group A who received intravaginal prostaglandin (PG) E₂, those who had simultaneous sweeping had significantly shorter mean induction-labor interval (12.9 ± 1.3 versus 16.2 ± 1.1 hours, p = 0.046), lower mean dose of oxytocin (6.6 ± 0.6 versus 10.11 ± 1.4 mU/minute, p = 0.01), and increased normal delivery rates (vaginal delivery 82.8% versus 58.6%, p = 0.01). Sweeping also had a favorable effect on nulliparas who had ARM and received oxytocin alone (mean induction-labor interval 5.9 ± 2.9 versus 10.9 ± 2.6 hours p = 0.04, mean maximum dose of oxytocin 9.8 ± 1.1 versus 15.2 ± 1.1 mU/min, p = 0.01). These results were restricted to women with unfavorable cervix in Group A those who had membrane sweeping.

Conclusion: Membrane sweeping, has beneficial effects on labor and delivery, which is limited to nulliparas with unfavorable cervix requiring PGE₂ or Oxytocin alone.

• Membranes “swept”
• membranes “not swept”
• multipara
• nullipara
• outcome measures

Declaration of interest

The manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, and each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work. This study did not receive any funds.

The authors certify that no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article exists, and the submitting/corresponding author signs for and accepts responsibility for realizing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.