Modelling umbilical vein blood flow normograms at 14–40 weeks of gestation by quantile regression analysis

Abstract

Objective: To construct reference limits for gestation of umbilical vein blood flow (UVBF) in normal singleton pregnancies between 14 and 40 weeks of gestation using quantile regression.

Methods: We ultrasonographycally examined 852 fetuses from low-risk pregnancies between 16 and 40 weeks of gestation in a prospective cross-sectional study. UV diameter and time-averaged maximum velocity (TAMXV) were measured in UV intra-abdominal portion by real time and Doppler ultrasonography. A semi-automatic measurement software was used to obtain UV diameter values. UVBF was then calculated from UV diameter and TAMXV measurements and expressed both as absolute value and as value normalized for fetal abdominal circumference (UVBF/AC). Individual centile values of the variables investigated were established by quantile regression in the gestational interval considered. In 50 cases UVBF was measured twice by the same investigator or by a second investigator and the intra- and inter-observer agreement were calculated.

Results: A significant increase in UV diameter, TAMXV, UVBF absolute value and UVBF/AC was evidenced in the gestational period considered. Growth charts were established based on these measurements. The intra- and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients resulted as 0.92 (0.87–0.96) and 0.89 (0.84–0.97), respectively, for UBVF.

Conclusions: In this study we constructed UVBF charts using quantile regression in a large cohort of low-risk pregnancies. These charts offer the advantage of specific estimated regression parameters for each percentile, better defining the normal range of UVBF. This promises to be useful in the diagnosis and management of fetuses with abnormal fetal growth.

• Doppler ultrasound
• fetal growth
• quantile regression
• umbilical vein blood flow

View correction statement:

Umbilical vein blood flow updated nomograms: a correction article

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.