382
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of customized and cohort-based birthweight standards in identification of growth-restricted infants in GUSTO cohort study

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 2519-2522 | Received 20 Jul 2015, Accepted 08 Sep 2015, Published online: 07 Oct 2015
 

Abstract

Background: The aim was to evaluate the ability of customized and cohort birthweight standards in discriminating intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR).

Methods: Birthweights (BWs) of GUSTO singleton infants born at gestational age (GA) 35–41 weeks were converted using two standards: (a) GUSTO cohort-based BW centile adjusted for GA and baby gender; (b) customized BW percentile calculator adjusted for maternal height and weight, race, parity, GA and gender. Infants were classified into three groups: (1) < 10th BW centile by customization– customized-SGA, (2) < 10th BW centile by GUSTO– GUSTO-SGA; and (3) > 10th BW centile by both standards – BOTH-non-SGA.

Results: Of the 1011 infant–mother dyads, 68 were customized-SGA and 104 were GUSTO-SGA, with concordance of 61% (n = 63) for SGA. While 5 (7%) of customized-SGA were not SGA by GUSTO-charts, 41 (39%) of GUSTO-SGA were not SGA by customized-charts. Customized-SGA had significantly the least growth in abdominal circumference (AC) and highest head circumference (HC): AC growth ratio between second and third trimester; and the lowest mean BW, ponderal index and placental weight than other groups.

Conclusion: Customized-SGA standard was a better discriminator of pathologic fetal growth based on AC growth. It improved strength of association with pathology and in our population reduced false positives (41/104 = 39%) in the assessment of SGA.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the study subjects, their families, the GUSTO Study Group, Tuck Seng Cheng and Mor Jack Ng for their time and help.

Ethics approval

The study protocol was approved by Domain Specific Review Board of the Singapore National Healthcare Group and the Centralized Institutional Review Board of SingHealth. All participants gave their written informed consent.

Declaration of interest

This work is supported by the Translational Clinical Research (TCR) Flagship Program on Developmental Pathways to Metabolic Disease funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) and administered by the National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore – NMRC/TCR/004-NUS/2008.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.