Slow versus rapid enteral feed in preterm neonates with antenatal absent end diastolic flow

Abstract

Objective: Incidence of feed intolerance (FI) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in preterm neonates with Doppler evidence of absent end diastolic flow (AEDF) velocities in the fetal umbilical artery when enteral feed volumes were started by 6–72 h and advanced either slowly or rapidly.

Methods: Stable inborn neonates, 30–36 weeks gestation, weighing ≥1000 g and with antenatal evidence of AEDF were included in this pilot study. Infants (stratified in <1250 g and ≥1250 g birth weight categories) were allocated under randomized controlled trial, to receive either slow or rapid advancement of enteral feeding, while initiating the feeds after 6 h of birth if bowel sounds were present. Primary outcome measure was, FI and NEC till day 7 after reaching full feeds.

Results: Of 159 eligible infants, 83 were randomized: 53 infants in the ≥1250 g category (28 in rapid and 25 in slow group) and 30 in the <1250 g category (15 in each group). FI was present in 11% versus 16% in ≥1250 g (p = 0.570) and 27% versus 33% in <1250 g (p = 0.690), NEC developed in 8.4% (3 versus 1) in ≥1250 g and (1 versus 2) in <1250 g, in slow versus rapid feeding.

Conclusion: This trial did not find increase in incidence of feed intolerance with very early introduction and rapid advancement of enteral feeds in stable preterm neonates with AEDF and birth weight ≥1250 g.

Keywords:

• Absent end diastolic flow
• early introduction
• preterm neonates
• rapid advancement

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contribution of Dr William McGurie who edited the article. We sincerely convey our thanks to all the patients, senior residents and nursing staff.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.