149
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Screening performance of different methods defining fetal nasal bone hypoplasia as a single and combined marker for the detection of trisomy 21 in the second trimester

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 3368-3373 | Received 27 Sep 2015, Accepted 29 Nov 2015, Published online: 14 Jan 2016
 

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate different methods of defining fetal nasal bone hypoplasia in the second trimester for the detection of trisomy 21.

Methods: Prospective study in Greek women undergoing anomaly scan between 18 + 0 and 23 + 6 weeks. The following methods of defining nasal bone hypoplasia were evaluated, either as a single marker or in combination with others: (1) BPD to nasal bone length (NBL) ratio; (2) multiples of the median (MoM) of NBL, according to normal curves from a Greek population; (3–4) NBL < 2.5 percentile according to normal curves (3) commonly used internationally curves and (4) curves from a Greek population.

Results: In total, 1301 singleton fetuses were evaluated − 10 with trisomy 21. The best detection rate of trisomy 21 was achieved when the applied method was nasal bone percentiles adjusted to maternal ethnicity, in combination with other markers (<2.5 percentile according to normal curves from a Greek population; p < 0.001; sensitivity 50%; specificity 94.8%; false-positive rate 5.2%; positive likelihood ratio 9.6).

Conclusion: Screening performance of fetal nasal bone hypoplasia in detecting trisomy 21 varies according to the method applied. The best screening performance is achieved by using percentiles adjusted to maternal ethnicity in combination with other markers of aneuploidy.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank El. Vogiatzopoulou for assistance in data collection, Dr A. Karavida, Dr M. Papastergiou and Dr A. Zavlanos for routine second trimester nasal bone measurements and I. Dimitrakopoulos (GE Healthcare) for technical consultation.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no relevant conflict of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.