798
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Carbetocin versus oxytocin to reduce additional uterotonic use at non-elective caesarean section: a double-blind, randomised trial*

, , &
Pages 3866-3869 | Received 02 Dec 2015, Accepted 29 Jan 2016, Published online: 03 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Objective: We compared the efficacy of Carbetocin (long-acting oxytocin receptor agonist) versus Oxytocin given at non-elective caesarean section.

Method: We performed a double-blind, randomised, single-centre study. Eligible women were ≥37 weeks of gestation undergoing emergency caesarean section. Participants received either carbetocin of 100 μg or oxytocin 5 international units. The primary outcome was the need to administer additional uterotonics, as determined by the clinician. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, haemoglobin drop pre–post operation and the need for a blood transfusion

Results: From August 2012 to February 2013, 114 women were enroled. Two were excluded from analysis as they received a general anaesthetic. Fifty-nine patients received 100-μg carbetocin; 53 received 5 international units oxytocin. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of women requiring additional uterotonics between the two groups: Carbetocin group 22% and Oxytocin group 13% (p = 0.323). There were no significant differences in the fall in haemoglobin, estimated blood loss, rates of post-partum haemorrhage or blood transfusions.

Conclusion: Oxytocin and carbetocin have similar requirements for additional uterotonics, estimated blood loss, haemoglobin drop and blood transfusions. There was a trend towards requiring additional uterotonics in patients receiving Carbetocin which was not statistically significant. This study found no benefits in using carbetocin over oxytocin.

Acknowledgements

We thank N. Elphinstone, K. Jayasekera, S. Rajoo and K. Humnabadker who contributed to patient recruitment.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

This project was awarded the Peninsula Health Grant for Health Research. The sponsor had no role in conduct of the research or preparation of the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.