1,369
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editor

Estimates of the number of adults in England, Wales, and Scotland with a hearing loss

, &
Pages 60-61 | Received 27 Mar 2013, Accepted 27 Sep 2013, Published online: 25 Nov 2013

The recent release of the results of the 2011 Census gives an opportunity to update the population estimates of the number of adults in England, Wales, and Scotland with hearing loss. We took the prevalence data from the National Study of Hearing (Davis (Citation1995) pp.47–49), and multiplied them by the number of adults from the English/Welsh and Scottish censuses. We used a hearing loss of 35 dB or more in the better of the two ears (averaged over 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 Hz), as this was the target value of a recent HTA (Health Technology Assessment) report into screening for hearing loss in older adults (Davis et al, Citation2007).

The calculations are shown in the accompanying table. The estimate is 3.8 million adults (aged 18–80) with a hearing loss of at least 35 dB in their better ear. This corresponds to 1 in 12 of the population. Repeating the calculation with the 95% confidence intervals gave a range of 2.8 million to 5.3 million. Davis's own calculation, using mid-1994 population values, was 3.4 million (p.835). The increase over the last two decades is therefore about 12%. The values for hearing loss of at least 25 dB or 40 dB in the better ear are respectively 7.5 million and 2.7 million, corresponding to 1 in 6.1 and 1 in 17.

We have not calculated estimates in the population aged over 80, as the National Study of Hearing did not measure audiograms in anyone aged older than 80. Nevertheless, Davis did provide an estimate of prevalence for 80 + based on earlier estimates (p.822). That value was 81% for a hearing loss of at least 35 dB: when multiplied by the census populations of 2.3 million (England and Wales) and 200 000 (Scotland) for those aged 81 or more, it gives 1.8 million and 160 000 adults respectively.

We caution that all these values can only be estimates, as the audiological data underpinning the prevalences in the UK National Study of Hearing were collected in the 1980s. It is possible that the long-term changes in the UK economy away from heavy industry, as well as the effects of UK and European noise-at-work regulations, have changed the prevalences since. The paucity of recent UK prevalence data for adults aged 80 or more is also a cause of concern. We note that there are substantial differences in the estimates of prevalence across the world, by as much as a factor of 2 (Stevens et al, 2011), and so perhaps our underlying assumption of an across-time stasis in prevalence is questionable. However, the National Study of Hearing remains the best data available in the UK, due to the care taken in the work and the sample size (n = 2663), and we therefore believe that the present calculations are at least fairly accurate.

Measurements of prevalence are crucial to measuring the impact on society of hearing loss, and are also fundamental to across-disease comparisons of burden, as for instance in the Global Burden of Disease studies (Vos et al, Citation2012). The numbers reported in highlight both the size of the UK population that is affected by hearing loss and the substantial increase in the last 20 years. They also underpin the importance of ongoing research into understanding hearing loss as well as the continual clinical and technological development of treatments.

Table 1. Summary of calculations of the expected number of adults (aged 18–80) in England & Wales (top half), and Scotland (bottom half) with hearing losses of at least 35 dB in the better ear. Note that the three right-most columns are rounded to the nearest 500.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

The Scottish Section of IHR is supported by the Medical Research Council (grant number U135097131) and by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government.

References

  • British Society of Audiology. 2011. Recommended procedure: Pure-tone air-conduction and bone-conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking. http://www.thebsa.org.uk/images/stories/BSA_RP_PTA_FINAL_24Sept11_MinorAmend06Feb12.pdf (accessed Feb 25th, 2013).
  • Davis A. 1995. Hearing in Adults. London: Whurr.
  • Davis A., Smith P., Ferguson M., Stephens D. & Gianopoulos I. 2007. Acceptability, benefit, and costs of early screening for hearing disability: A study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technology Assessment. 2007, 11, No. 42.
  • Stevens G., Flaxman S., Brunskill E., Mascarenhas M., Mathers C.D. et al. 2013. Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: An analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries. Eur J Public Health 23, 146–152.
  • Vos T., Flaxman A.D., Naghavi M., Lozano R., Michaud C. et al. 2012. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2010. The Lancet, 380, 2163–2196.