9,156
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editor

Does therapeutic use of tapentadol cause false-positive urine screens for methadone or opiates?

, &
Pages 493-494 | Received 12 Feb 2015, Accepted 12 Feb 2015, Published online: 08 May 2015

To the Editor:

Tapentadol (Nucynta®, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, NJ) is a synthetic analgesic approved in the US in 2008.Citation1 Although mechanisms of action include mu opioid receptor agonism and serotonin reuptake inhibition, the drug is structurally similar to amphetamine. We previously found no false-positive urine amphetamine screens among patients taking therapeutic doses of tapentadol.Citation2 We froze the samples at − 80°C for future research.

In 2012, Collins et al. reported positive urine methadone screens using the DRI® Methadone enzyme immunoassay (EIA) among patients taking tapentadol.Citation3 We sought to determine whether therapeutic use of tapentadol is associated with false-positive urine screen for opiate or methadone by Syva EMIT II® immunoassay.

We thawed the specimens before testing with the Siemens Syva EMIT II® immunoassay for methadone and opiates. We confirmed all positive results by gas chromatography for methadone or liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) for other opioids.

Aliquots from all specimens underwent quantitation of tapentadol and N-desmethyltapentadol by Mayo Medical Laboratories. After the addition of ammonium acetate buffer and beta-glucuronidase to liberate glucuronide-conjugated tapentadol and N-desmethyltapentadol, each sample underwent the LC–MS/MS method described by Coulter et al.Citation4 For each analyte, the lower limit of quantitation is 50 ng/mL and the upper reporting limit is 50,000 ng/mL.

shows the patients’ self-reported doses of tapentadol, EMIT results for methadone and opiates, confirmatory test results, active prescriptions, and quantitation of tapentadol and N-desmethyltapentadol.

Table 1. Patient characteristics and laboratory results.

Our results differ from those of Collins et al., who found frequent false-positive urine screens for methadone among patients taking tapentadol.Citation3 The Collins study used the DRI Methadone EIA,Citation5 a cloned enzyme donor immunoassay, which may have different performance characteristics from the Syva EMIT II immunoassay. They also used a lower threshold for methadone concentration of 130 ng/mL instead of the standard cutoff of 300 ng/mL. This lower threshold may increase the reported number of false-positive results. The Collins study did find cross-reactivity of tapentadol and its metabolites in concentrations reasonably achievable in the urine of patients with therapeutic use of tapentadol. Without knowing the total number of tapentadol-exposed patients or the number of patients from whom the false-positive methadone samples arose, one cannot estimate the test characteristics in the population of tapentadol-exposed patients.

All eleven patients in our study reported taking therapeutic doses of tapentadol between 50 and 600 mg/day (the range specified by the package insert)Citation1 with a median of 200 mg/day. About 99% of ingested tapentadol undergoes glucuronide conjugation (55%) and sulfate conjugation (15%) before excretion into the urine.Citation1,Citation6 Our findings are consistent with study of a point-of-care immunoassay which showed no cross-reaction to tapentadol at 2,500 ng/mL.Citation7 Our findings extend this range by showing no cross-reaction with the Syva EMIT II® immunoassay at concentrations above 50,000 ng/mL.

No false-positive urine screens for methadone or opiate occurred using the Syva EMIT II® immunoassay in urine samples from eleven patients with confirmed therapeutic use of up to 600 mg/day of tapentadol.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. http://www.nucynta.com/shared/product/nucynta/Nucynta-PI.pdf#zoom = 100 (accessed 11 February 2015)
  • Tang S, Mullins ME, Braun BM, Hock KG, Scott MG, Guarino AJ, Brasington RD. Can tapentadol cause a false positive urine drug screen result for amphetamine? Clin Toxicol 2012; 50:1174–1175.
  • Collins AA, Merritt AP, Bourland JA. Cross-reactivity of tapentadol specimens with DRI Methadone Enzyme Immunoassay. J Anal Toxicol 2012; 36:582–587.
  • Coulter C, Taruc M, Tuyay J, Moore C. Determination of tapentadol and its metabolite N-desmethyltapentadol in urine and oral fluid using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectral detection. J Anal Toxicol 2010; 34:458–463.
  • Microgenics Corporation. https://fscimage.fishersci.com/images/D13604∼.pdf (accessed 11 February 2015)
  • Terlinden R. Ossig J, Fliegert F, Lange C, Goehler K. Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-labeled tapentadol HCl in healthy male subjects. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinetics 2007; 32:163–169.
  • Greene DN, Lehman CM, McMillin GA. Evaluation of the integrated E-Z Split Key® Cup II for the rapid detection of twelve drug classes in urine. J Anal Toxicol 2011; 35:46–53.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.