454
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

What happens when seniors participate in new eHealth schemes?

&
Pages 572-580 | Received 13 Mar 2015, Accepted 13 Jun 2015, Published online: 16 Jul 2015
 

Abstract

This article adds empirical depth to our understanding of seniors’ involvement in the making of eHealth systems. Multi-sited interviews and observations were conducted at seniors’ homes before an eHealth system was installed, during the home trials and post-removal of the system. Our findings indicate that although the senior participants chose to participate in the home trials, the choice itself was configured by the stigmatization of seniors as technophobes, fear of “falling behind” and the association of technology with youth, the future and being up-to-date. Being a participant in home trials of an eHealth system became an identity of its own, representing a forward thinking and contemporary person who embraced changes and new technology.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • This article highlights the importance of understanding the participants' drive to participate in field trials and the impact this motivation has on how, during field trials, they perceive using an eHealth system and its perceived usefulness.

  • When studying eHealth systems “in the making at senior” participants' homes, the seniors become part of the research team. The senior participants' learning and knowledge transfer evolves from the dialogue with the research team. For equal participation and power there is a need for ethical, mutual and equal power-relations in the research team (between researchers from different paradigms such as engineers and sociologists) as well as between the researchers' and the participants'.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the senior volunteers, Malin Nilsson and Lena Almquist from Örebro Municipality who handled the telepresence robot, the GiraffPlus team who worked together to make this happen, especially CNR-ISTC in Italy who provided the picture of the system, and Eileen Deaner who proofread this document. We also would like to thank the anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments on a previous version. This research is partially funded by the European Commission under FP7-ICT-288173 GiraffPlus.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 340.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.