Continuous vs. blocks of physiotherapy for motor development in children with cerebral palsy and similar syndromes: A prospective randomized study

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether physiotherapy is more effective when applied in blocks or continuously in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: A prospective randomized cross-over design study compared the effect of regular physiotherapy (baseline) with blocks of physiotherapy alternating with no physiotherapy over one year. Thirty-nine institutionalized children with CP and clinically similar syndromes (6–16 years old, Gross Motor Function Classification Scale II–IV) were included. During the first scholastic year, group A received regular physiotherapy, group B blocks of physiotherapy and vice versa in the second year. The Gross Motor Function Measure 66 (GMFM-66) was the outcome measure. Results: Thirteen children in each group completed the study. GMFM-66 improved (p < 0.05) over the study period in both groups in total; changes (p < 0.05) were seen only in dimension D (group B) and E (both groups) during regular therapy. Conclusion: Physiotherapy may be more effective when provided regularly rather than in blocks.

• Cerebral palsy
• en bloc
• motor development
• physiotherapy
• randomized clinical trial
• regular

Acknowledgements

We thank the participating institutions for their cooperation.