Abstract
This study has reported the efficacy of an autologous bone marrow-impregnated collagen matrix experimentally and clinically. Then, it reflected that platelet rich plasma (PRP) was as good a source of growth factors as bone marrow and available in a less invasive procedure. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a PRP-impregnated collagen matrix with that of a bone marrow-impregnated collagen matrix by quantifying wound size and capillary density using genetically diabetic db/db mice. Bone marrow cells were obtained from femurs of ddy mice. Then, a small amount of collagen matrix was immersed in bone marrow suspension. This is called a bone marrow-impregnated collagen matrix. PRP was obtained from healthy human blood and a small amount of collagen matrix was immersed in PRP. This is called a PRP-impregnated collagen matrix. A bone marrow-impregnated collagen matrix and PRP-impregnated collagen matrix were applied to excisional skin wounds on a genetically healing-impaired mouse (n = 6) and wounds were evaluated 6 days after the procedure. Wounds were divided into two groups: PRP (n = 6), in which a PRP-impregnated collagen matrix was applied; and bone marrow (n = 6), in which collagen immersed in a bone marrow suspension was applied. There was no significant difference between the PRP and bone-marrow groups in the rate of vascular density increase or wound size decrease. The present study suggested that the PRP-impregnated collagen matrix promotes repair processes at least as strongly as the bone marrow-impregnated collagen matrix. Given lower invasiveness, the PRP-impregnated collagen matrix would have advantages in clinical use.
Acknowledgement
We thank Associate Professor Ryuhei Tanaka, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center for his helpful suggestions. We also thank Dr Miho Suzuki at the Department of Transfusion and Cell Therapy, Saitama medical University Hospital for her clinical support.