338
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Predictors of positive or negative legionella urinary antigen test in community-acquired pneumonia

, &
Pages 484-490 | Received 30 Sep 2014, Accepted 16 Feb 2015, Published online: 11 Mar 2015
 

Abstract

Background: Legionella pneumonia remains a diagnostic challenge. The legionella urinary antigen test (LUT) primarily detects Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, accounting for 64% of Danish cases, and is often the only legionella test performed. We aimed to identify variables predictive of a positive or negative test result and to explore how the LUT was used in clinical practice. Methods: The study was an audit-based cohort study. LUT-positive patients were compared with three randomly selected age- and gender-matched LUT-negative referent patients admitted at a Danish university hospital during 2003–2013. Data were extracted from charts and databases. Positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR–) were calculated. For CURB-65 and sepsis, sensitivity analyses were made due to incomplete data. Results: In all, 25 cases were compared with 75 referents. Factors associated with LUT positivity included recent travel outside Scandinavia (LR + 5.3), Na+ < 130 mEq/L (LR + 4.3), confusion (LR + 4.2), C-reactive protein (CRP) > 200 mg/L (LR + 3.5), temperature > 39°C (LR + 3.5), and CURB-65 score ≥ 3 (LR + 3.0–15.0, depending on the model). Decreasing the likelihood of LUT positivity were CRP < 200 mg/L (LR– 0.1), absence of sepsis (LR– 0.1–0.2, depending on the model), absence of tachycardia (heart rate < 90) (LR– 0.2) and normal pulmonary auscultation (LR– 0.3). Additional legionella tests were performed in 60% of the cases and 13% of the referents. Conclusion: Classical features of severe pneumonia are associated with a positive LUT. The LUT is often used inappropriately and should be accompanied by PCR analysis.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Steen Hoffmann and Søren Uldum at Statens Serum Institut for providing data on LUTs and PCR analyses performed there.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflict of interests. No funding was received for the study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 174.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.