376
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editors

Detection of inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSBi) among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from Libya

Article: 4636 | Published online: 13 Jan 2010

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) first emerged as nosocomial pathogens in the early 1960s are of great concern to public health and highly reported in human clinical samples Citation1. There are major international concerns about rising levels of MRSA and multi-drug resistant S. aureus owing to the difficulties of treating infections and the ease with which MRSA spreads within hospitals Citation2. Until recently, most infections of MRSA were acquired primarily in hospital settings, but now MRSA is responsible for both hospital and community-acquired infections Citation1. The objective of this study was to investigate MRSA collected isolates for MLSB phenotypes, in particular inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSBi).

MRSA collected isolates of hospital-origin were further investigated at the Microbiology Department, Biotechnology Research Centre, Tripoli, Libya. One hundred and twenty-eight MRSA isolates were confirmed at species level as S. aureus by culturing onto mannitol salt agar (MSA) and API Staph test strips (bioMerieux). Confirmation as MRSA was by latex agglutination test for PBP2a and disc diffusion method against cefoxitin in accordance with British Society of Antimicrobials and Chemotherapy guidelines (BSAC) as described by Andrews Citation3. Isolates were also tested against erythromycin, clindamycin, and synercid for the characterization of MLSB phenotypic isolates. D-tests were performed on isolates exhibiting erythromycin resistance, to assay for the presence of inducible clindamycin resistance (MLSBi phenotype) as described by Fiebelkorn et al. Citation4.

Of the 128 tested MRSA isolates, 24.2% (n=31) were resistant to clindamycin, 63.2% (n=81) isolates were resistant to erythromycin, and 17.9% (n=23) were resistant to synercid. Twelve isolates (9.3%) exhibited MLSBc (constitutive) phenotype and D-tests identified six isolates (4.6%) with inducible resistance to clindamycin (MLSBi phenotype).

Clindamycin is an efficient and economic lincosamide drug used for the treatment of staphylococci infection Citation5. One macrolide resistance mechanism, modification of a drug binding site on the ribosome, results in resistance to macrolides, azalides, lincosamides, and group (B) streptogramins (MLSB). MLSB phenotypes can be either constitutive (MLSBc) or inducible (MLSBi). The inducible resistance to clindamycin (MLSBi) in MRSA can severely compromise therapy and can result in failure of clindamycin treatment of MRSA infections when non-suitable therapy (e.g. erythromycin) is given Citation6. MLSBi strains can be successfully treated with clindamycin; however MLSBi can complicate therapy when MLSBi phenotype-switching into MLSBc occurs possibly due to mutation, in the absence of macrolide inducers Citation6. Clindamycin can still be used for MRSA infections in our hospitals. Citation7 However, susceptibility testing for the detection of inducible resistance to clindamycin should be routinely performed Citation7 Citation8.

Mohamed O. Ahmed

Department of Microbiology

Biotechnology Research Centre

Tripoli, Libya

and

Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine

AlFateh University

Tripoli, Libya

Email: [email protected]

Mohamed H. Alghazali and Abdelalbaset R. Abuzweda

Department of Microbiology

Biotechnology Research Centre

Tripoli, Libya

Samira G. Amri

Burns and Plastic Surgery Centre

Tripoli, Libya

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr. Mohamed El Sherif the director of National Authority for Scientific Research, Tripoli, Libya for the unlimited support and Dr. Keith E. Baptiste from the University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

References

  • Robinson JO, Pearson JC, Christiansen KJ, Coombs GW, Murray RJ. Community-associated versus healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a 10-year retrospective review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009; 28: 353–61.
  • Gould IM. The clinical significance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect. 2005; 61: 277–82.
  • Andrews JM. BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method (version 5). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006; 58: 511–29.
  • Fiebelkorn KR, Crawford SA, McElmeel ML, Jorgensen JH. Practical disk diffusion method for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41: 4740–4.
  • Oguz VA, Yapar N, Sezak N, Cavus SA, Kurutepe S, Peksel H, et al.. The rate of inducible clindamycin resistance and susceptibilities to other antimicrobial agents in staphylococci. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2009; 43: 37–44.
  • Lewis JS, Jorgensen JH. Inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci: should clinicians and microbiologists be concerned?. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 40: 280–5.
  • El-Bouri K. Clinical microbiology services are essential for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of MRSA and other nosocomial pathogens in Libyan healthcare facilities. Libyan J Med. 2009; 4: 128–9.
  • Zorgani A, Shawerf O, Tawil K, El-Turki E, Ghenghesh KS. Inducible clindamycin resistance among staphylococci isolated from burn patients. Libyan J Med. 2009; 4: 149–52.