935
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Trend Articles

A student-initiated and student-facilitated international health elective for preclinical medical students

, , , &
Article: 4896 | Received 23 Aug 2009, Published online: 15 Feb 2010

Abstract

Introduction: Global health education is becoming more important for developing well-rounded physicians and may encourage students toward a career in primary care. Many medical schools, however, lack adequate and structured opportunities for students beginning the curriculum.

Methods: Second-year medical students initiated, designed, and facilitated a pass–fail international health elective, providing a curricular framework for preclinical medical students wishing to gain exposure to the clinical and cultural practices of a developing country.

Results: All course participants (N=30) completed a post-travel questionnaire within one week of sharing their experiences. Screening reflection essays for common themes that fulfill university core competencies yielded specific global health learning outcomes, including analysis of health care determinants.

Conclusion: Medical students successfully implemented a sustainable global health curriculum for preclinical student peers. Financial constraints, language, and organizational burdens limit student participation. In future, long-term studies should analyze career impact and benefits to the host country.

Introduction

Understanding international health care is increasingly important for medical professionals in the USA Citation1. The rise in global interdependence has caused seemingly isolated public health threats in one part of the world to escalate into worldwide concerns Citation2. Furthermore, rising immigration rates contribute to an ever more diverse patient population Citation3. These trends have led to a growing demand for doctors who are familiar with diseases endemic to other parts of the world and who can treat patients with cultural sensitivity Citation2. Currently, it is of paramount importance that we train and equip health care professionals to meet this demand.

One method to address the need for global health education is an international elective during medical school. Studies have shown that exposure to health care in a developing country allows students to improve their clinical skills, decrease their reliance on technology, and gain a better understanding of global public health issues Citation4Citation5. International electives are also becoming increasingly popular among students Citation6. While only 5.9% of graduating medical students completed clinical education abroad in 1979, 27.3% participated in 2007 Citation7Citation8. Although many medical schools have pilot-tested international health electives, preclinical medical students’ demands are still not being met Citation4Citation9. A literature review revealed two publications about international health electives for preclinical medical students. One elective at the University of Massachusetts allowed preclinical medical students to participate in language classes in a foreign country, but lacked clinical exposure Citation10. The University of Texas Medical Branch offered a clinical experience to its preclinical medical students traveling to Nicaragua, but limited the number of participants and restricted the experience to one country Citation11. Meanwhile, medical students with international clinical experience are more likely to enter primary care medicine Citation5. Recent studies have shown that a greater primary care physician supply translated into lower mortality rates, while a higher specialist ratio resulted in higher mortality rates Citation12. Despite this, the number of medical students entering family practice training in the USA dropped by 50% between 1997 and 2005. Therefore, it is crucial for medical schools to encourage their students to pursue primary care medicine Citation13. Furthermore, experiences in the preclinical years could have an even greater impact on shaping such career decisions in medicine Citation2.

At Chicago Medical School (CMS), we developed a program to facilitate international exposure in the preclinical years. For the past several years, interested CMS students have traveled abroad in the summer following their first year. The International Health Interest Group (IHIG), an on-campus club, provided a contact list of clinical sites while students arranged and funded their experiences. Although this system offered some medical exposure to enthusiastic students, the extent of this exposure was inconsistent. With no minimum criteria for a site and no student accountability for the depth of their work, it was challenging for students to define goals for their international health experience. These limitations called for a structured course with a focused curriculum and learning standards.

To address these limitations, two Rosalind Franklin students, NV and MC, created an official course. This paper describes the design and implementation of the course and represents the student responses to these experiences.

2 Methods

‘Clinical Experience in a Developing Country’ (MCUR607) is a pass–fail sophomore elective course implemented at CMS in 2006. The course provides a curricular framework for medical students wishing to gain exposure to the clinical and cultural practices of a developing country during the summer after their first year. Sophomore electives offer in-depth training in specific or applied areas of the basic medical sciences to medical students in good academic standing who have completed first-year requirements. Eligible students choose from a number of didactic, interdisciplinary, research, or service-oriented classes. MCUR607 fulfills two out of the three pass–fail sophomore elective units required for medical student graduation. NV and MC designed the course with a vision for participants to develop into well-rounded ‘complete’ physicians, capable of caring effectively for a diverse patient population. Course objectives describing valuable skills and knowledge attainable through a study-abroad experience early in students’ medical careers related directly to the University's existing core competencies (). With the support of IHIG's faculty advisor (CL), jointly serving as course director, the course proposal was presented to the Educational Affairs Committee and accepted as a new sophomore elective.

Table 1. MCUR607 course objectives

2.1 Pretravel: clinical approval and waiver

Two months prior to traveling abroad, first-year medical students submitted a Clinic Approval Form to course faculty, describing the clinic or clinical program, expected volunteering activities, contact information of physician mentor, and any additional program or language requirements, as well as planned dates of travel, specific costs, and living arrangements. Course Teaching Assistants (HP and AH), two student officers elected through IHIG, screened submissions for completeness and adherence to course objectives, requested missing program details, and advised students having difficulty with the process. Most students traveled to clinics chosen from an established list created by IHIG based on the experiences of previous students and faculty. Some opted to use their own contacts or the Internet to find new programs. These students completed a New Clinic Approval Form, which required additional details on how they discovered the program, the type of clinic or hospital, the patient population served, and any affiliations with a medical school. In either case, faculty oversight encouraged students to plan early for a successful trip and ensured that students’ programs met the course mission and requirements. Along with the Clinic Approval Form, students also submitted a waiver and release form prior to travel. Developed in collaboration with the University general counsel, the waiver released the University from liability for a student's health or injury and required students to obtain adequate health insurance covering medical evacuation and repatriation. Students were encouraged to go to the State department and Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) websites to monitor any political unrest or infectious outbreaks in their planned country of travel. The University's malpractice insurance policy covered enrolled students during the international clinical experience.

2.2 Requirements abroad

Students were required to volunteer at a clinic in a developing nation for at least 60 h and a minimum of three weeks under the direction of a physician mentor. Currently, at CMS, sophomore elective credits require 30 h of involvement to obtain one credit. Students completing MCUR607 received two sophomore credits. Hence, this elective required students to complete 60 h of work. After completing the experience, the mentor signed a Physician Verification Form to confirm the hours worked and provide feedback on the student's behavior. Some students incorporated language study into their clinical experience. In this case, language classes substituted up to 20 h of the clinical volunteering requirement. Students also kept a patient log with patient age, gender, chief complaint, diagnosis, and treatment. While not specifically required, students were encouraged to keep a journal for self-reflection, interact and communicate with indigenous people, travel within the country, and appreciate alternative perspectives.

2.3 Reflecting and sharing the experience: essay, PowerPoint, and learning outcomes

Each student was required to write a 1,000–1,500-word reflection essay. Specifically, the essay addressed (a) the program, country, and daily activities; (b) two country-specific determinants of individual health or quality of life (i.e., sanitation, endemic diseases, governmental or public policy); (c) a patient who made a strong impression on the student; (d) how the experience may impact the student's future career in medicine; and (e) any unexpected obstacles or challenges faced during the stay.

Students also created a 10-min PowerPoint presentation with a photo journal illustrating their experience and its impact, both cultural and academic. Students who traveled with peers in the same program could opt to create one PowerPoint and present as a group. The essay, PowerPoint, as well as patient log and Physician Verification Form, were submitted to course faculty by the second week of the sophomore year, either in person or through an online drop box as part of the University's online course management system.

Within one month of submission, all students who completed the course attended a mandatory meeting and shared their presentations with each other. Presentations were also given throughout the year at University-wide meetings sponsored by IHIG. The group selected presentations representing a variety of regions and cultures, often in conjunction with a cultural organization on campus, in order to recognize past participants and inspire new ones. Presentations also shared the achievements and challenges of student experiences, led discussions on country-specific, medico-cultural issues, and raised awareness of global health issues around campus.

NV and MC independently screened the reflection essays for common themes; only those themes recognized by both screeners were used to define learning outcomes. Themes were chosen based on the repetition of keywords and the patterns of ideas noted while reading the essays. Constant comparisons were made by re-reading essays as new themes were defined. Exact quotations from each essay representing a particular learning outcome were extracted. These quotations were then counted to calculate the frequency of each learning outcome and a portion selected for publication (see ).

3 Results

3.1 Description

In 2007, 30 second-year CMS students (N=30, 15 males, 15 females) participated in and successfully completed the MCUR607 elective with a combined total of 3,276 h spent abroad. Students completed an average of 109.2 h each, with a range of 40–300 h.

3.2 Pattern of involvement

Students traveled across four major continents: Asia (South, East, and Southeast), Africa, Central America, and Europe. Thirty-four percent of students traveled to China, 23% to India, 14% to Ecuador, 7% to Ghana, 7% to South Korea, 3% to Armenia, 3% to the Czech Republic, 3% to the Philippines, 3% to Costa Rica, and 3% to Vietnam. describes the programs offered at the various international health sites at which students participated.

Table 2. International health sites

Ninety-three percent of students observed surgical procedures, 70% conducted physical examinations, 46% assisted in surgery, 43% of students performed history taking, 17% administered medications (Rx), 17% conducted social counseling, and 10% stated ‘other.’. The skills listed under the heading of ‘other’ included inserting intra-venous (IV) lines, inserting Foley catheters, inserting naso-gastric tubes, and assisting with cardiac stress tests. All procedures were carried out under the direct supervision of a qualified preceptor.

One hundred percent of students interacted with physicians, 87% with nurses, 23% with physiotherapists, 13% with religious chaplains, 7% with social workers, and 7% with others. One inter-professional interaction listed within ‘other’ was a practitioner of traditional Ayurvedic medicine in India. Another student witnessed the integration of Chinese acupuncture with allopathic medicine.

3.3 Student responses

Within one week of the mandatory student presentations, 100% of students completed a ‘Post-Experience Survey’ composed of various statements pertaining to international health (). Prior to survey distribution, Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was granted and students provided informed written consent. This survey used a 5-point Likert Scale (Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Somewhat Agree, Agree, Strongly Agree), with each response receiving a numerical value from one to five. We compiled and analyzed data from the survey based on whether the response was one or two (negative) or three to five (positive). One hundred percent of students were exposed to a new culture, 100% would recommend MCUR607 to colleagues, 100% would like to make future contributions to international health in developing nations, 97% reported exposure to a new language, 93% felt more culturally sensitive, 90% thought the CMS curriculum prepared for this international experience, 87% learned novel skills that they would not normally have learned in North America at this stage of their education, 83% improved their knowledge on international health initiatives, and 70% believed this international experience altered their career choice.

Table 3. Post-experience survey comments

correlates student essay-derived learning outcomes and CMS core competencies. Selected student quotes reflect common themes witnessed during their international experiences. The most common themes reference cultural influences on medical care, government involvement, and socioeconomic issues. The remaining themes, from most to least frequently mentioned, include references to learning compassionate medicine, challenge of language barriers, future student involvement with underserved populations, preclinical student motivation, sanitation and sterility concerns, self-awareness and recognition of personal limitations, cultural sensitivity, lack of preventative medicine, strengthening non-verbal communication, and comparisons with American health care.

Table 4. Post-experience essay themes and quotes

4 Conclusion

As world cultures integrate, students and physicians across the USA have increased their concern for cultural sensitivity and competence. In order to better understand the interactions of these cultures with the health care system, many medical students elect to volunteer in clinics and hospitals abroad or join a Global Multiculturalism Track Citation4Citation10. Medical students have driven much of the growth in global health education Citation2. This paper describes the global health curriculum initiated, designed, and executed by medical students with faculty assistance and support, as well as its successful impact on the development of its participants as well-rounded physicians.

The structured curriculum of MCUR607 led to a paradigm shift of the extracurricular IHIG from a mere ‘travel club’ to an academic experience of cultural immersion and reflection on health care determinants. Despite students’ pretravel exposure to international health through peer and physician-led IHIG lectures, MCUR607 students remained surprised by their firsthand experience with cultural and societal-specific practices integrated into the hospital environments. One student was astonished by the rarity of prenatal care in a large, urban center of Vietnam. She attributed this to providers’ lack of emphasis on prevention education and limited demand secondary to the existence of traditional home remedies. A student who observed decreasing health care quality for poor patients in India learned how government corruption blocks the flow of finances allocated for system improvement. Another student did not expect emergent surgical care in China to require advanced payment, and his colleague concluded that ‘health care is a business worldwide.’ Rather than make simple observations, students used critical thinking to analyze the practice differences as a socio-behavioral science. As seen through their essays (), students primarily emphasized the impact of social class and economic disparities on health care access, as well as the role of culture on influencing a nation's practice of medicine.

These cross-cultural interactions help to promote the recognition of diverse practices, beliefs, and value systems, which is imperative for the practice of medicine as global interdependence strengthens. For example, many students who traveled to East Asia found that physicians defer to a patient's family rather than the patient when disclosing terminal prognoses. In the future, students who encounter a family wishing to withhold a terminal prognosis from a patient can address the situation in an empathic, culturally sensitive manner. Several other students in India, China, and Ecuador observed the integration of indigenous healing modalities with Western medicine and found them extremely compatible. They are more likely to question patients about any complementary or alternative medicine the patient may have used in order to provide more comprehensive care. Such medico-cultural experiences have the potential to influence the way students practice medicine in the future due to their new perspectives. Students’ recognition of these perspectives facilitates the establishment of a strong doctor–patient relationship, thus contributing to improved health status of immigrants arriving in the USA and the diverse cultures that make up this country.

The positive impact of the global health experience on the practice of medicine extends beyond treating members of different cultures. Students developed more compassionate methods of healing all patients by observing physicians practice ‘thoughtful medicine’ with ‘human touch,’ despite limited resources. In addition to exposure to various languages, students felt as though they had strengthened their non-verbal communication skills and the ability to provide comfort to patients with whom they could not speak. Students renewed their confidence while surviving and adapting in settings with fewer resources, language barriers, and cultural differences. Many redefined their understanding of privilege and, from this self-awareness, realized their desire to incorporate treating underserved populations into their careers. A reward of global health education not previously described in the literature Citation2Citation4 is the short-term impact to motivate preclinical students. As summarized in and , the vast benefits from a clinical experience in a developing country that students have described meet each of the MCUR607 objectives and fulfill all six CMS core competencies.

Despite the successful outcomes of the course, there exist several logistical hurdles of cost, language, and planning for students participating in MCUR607. Students must fund the trip themselves, and it is acknowledged that there are students who cannot participate in the course due to financial constraints. There are no scholarship funds available from CMS, but students are given information from IHIG about outside scholarships for which they can apply. Some programs, like that in Zhejiang Province of China and Dervin village of India, may subsidize housing or food costs, thereby attracting considerably more students. For universities without affiliated global health funding or departments like CMS, financial challenges remain an obstacle for students who wish to participate in clinical experiences abroad. Students must also accept a considerable organizational burden as part of the course. A large amount of time and resources must be devoted to finding a suitable placement for the student to fulfill their course obligations. If the experience does not materialize as planned, students must also problem-solve in real time. Two MCUR607 students traveling to Costa Rica discovered that their program, while fulfilling the language teaching as promised, did not have adequate site placements for the clinical portion of the experience. One student took the initiative to find her own clinical site and the other decided to use the time to travel rather than completing the course requirements. These students managed to communicate via email with the course faculty who attempted to assist with a new placement, but the ultimate responsibility fell on the students.

While students strengthened their non-verbal communication skills, several students wished they could speak the language of their patients to benefit the site. Even students who had experience in a language often felt local dialects or slang prevented them from fully participating in patient care. The language barrier drove many students to participate in surgical procedures that are not subject to the same language constraints of the history and physical examination in the clinic setting. Despite these obstacles, students enjoyed the course and all agreed they would recommend it to their peers.

There are several limitations to the conclusions drawn in this paper. Because no data were collected from students who traveled abroad prior to the creation of MCUR607, we can only infer the advantage of this model aside from the additional course credit students receive. The course founders, MC and NV, did travel in the year prior to course creation and agree with the benefits of the structured curriculum from an empirical standpoint. In addition, no control data were collected from peers of MCUR607 participants who did not travel, so we cannot know if students are developing similar skills through non-international experiences. The authors recognize the subjective nature of the data and the difficulty in preventing observer bias by the two authors, MC and NV, who coded the essays for themes. For this reason, we included the exact quotations from student papers in ; however, we do not include the full text of 30 essays for logistical reasons. Finally, we faced challenges in monitoring the quality of student experiences. While we attempted to validate the clinic sites in advance through submission of detailed approval forms, all assessment was at the discretion of the course faculty. The Physician Verification Form and patient log can be reviewed if there is question of experience quality, and the reflection essays offer students an opportunity to disclose their own analysis of any limitations in the experience. Because of the subjective nature of the course, there is, ultimately, an implicit trust in students who organize their experience, to research quality and report any irregularities.

While considering the challenges of the course and limitations of this paper, we do feel that other schools interested in developing an international health elective may follow our model. The foundation of the course involves a student organization that focuses on international health to serve as a focal point for information and publicity. The organization provides a means to engage dedicated students who wish to serve as course teaching assistants and the faculty advisor can double as course director. This is particularly useful in ensuring the course's sustainability when there is no dedicated Global Health department at the university. In order to travel for a substantial period, students must also have a block of time during their preclinical years to complete the international elective.

We have successfully established a student-initiated preclinical elective in international health and documented significant learning outcomes for students. In its pilot year, MCUR607 course organizers have obtained information from essays, patient logs, presentations, and post-experience surveys completed by traveling students. Such submissions, student comments, and the medical education literature provide a continuous source of feedback from which organizers can actively improve the course. A recent study Citation14 posed several valid ethical questions regarding the benefit afforded to a host country, as well as the possibility of maleficence when students participate in short-term clinical experiences abroad. Though physician-mentors provide clinical supervision, students themselves should reflect on possible ethical violations and negligence in their essays. While not a requirement, a small percentage of motivated students do bring medical supplies (e.g., gloves) to their sites or organize fundraisers upon their return based on witnessed needs during their clinical experience. In addition to encouraging such activities, we can actively seek subjective information about the benefits for the host country from host physician-mentors.

We have also shown that MCUR607 students wish to incorporate global health into their career, which may impact host countries in the long term. Interestingly, the literature also states that many students are more enthusiastic about primary care after returning from international heath efforts Citation2Citation4Citation15. Early global experiences afforded by MCUR607 may impact student decision making during a formative stage. Future studies should attempt to collect and analyze data regarding student specialty choice and host country benefit with the aim of answering these questions.

5 Conflict of interest and funding

The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry to conduct this study.

References

  • Haq C, Rothenberg D, Gjerde C, Bobula J, Wilson C, Bickley L, et al.. New world views: preparing physicians in training for global health work. Fam Med. 2000; 32: 566–72.
  • Drain PK, Primack A, Hunt DD, Fawzi WW, Holmes KK, Gardner P. Global health in medical education: a call for more training and opportunities. Acad Med. 2007; 82: 226–30.
  • US Census Bureau. Census 2005. WashingtonDC: US Census Bureau, 2006.
  • Thomson MJ, Huntington MK, Hunt DD, Pinsky LE, Brodie JJ. Educational effects of international health electives on U.S. and Canadian medical students and residents: a literature review. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 342–7.
  • Ramsey AH, Haq C, Gjerde CL, Rothenberg D. Career influence of an international health experience during medical school. Fam Med. 2004; 36: 412–6.
  • Edwards RE, Rowson M, Piachaud J. Teaching international health issues to medical students. Med Educ. 2001; 35: 807–8.
  • Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical student graduation questionnaire. WashingtonDC: AAMC, 1979.
  • Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical student graduation questionnaire. WashingtonDC: AAMC, 2007.
  • Godkin M, Savageau J. The effect of medical students’ international experience on attitudes toward serving underserved multicultural populations. Fam Med. 2003; 35: 273–8.
  • Godkin M, Savageau J. The effect of global multiculturalism track on cultural competence of preclinical medical students. Fam Med. 2001; 33: 178–6.
  • Smith JK, Weaver DB. Capturing medical students’ idealism. Ann Fam Med. 2006; 4: S32–7.
  • Shi L, Macinko J, Starfield B, Wulu J, Regan J, Politzer R. The relationship between primary care, income inequality, and mortality in US states, 1980–1995. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003; 16: 412–22.
  • American Academy of Family Physicians. National Resident Matching Program data: family medicine residency positions and number filled by U.S. medical school graduates, 1994–2006. Available from: http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/residents/match.html [cited 20 January 2008].
  • Crump J, Sugarman J. Ethical considerations for short-term experiences by trainees in global health. JAMA. 2008; 300: 1456–8.
  • Bazemore AW, Henein M, Goldenhar LM, Szaflarski M, Lindsell CJ, Diller P. The effect of offering international health training opportunities on family medicine residency recruiting. Fam Med. 2007; 39: 255–60.