Abstract
In the global North, housing tends to be seen as a sub-sector of the construction industry. In the global South, in contrast, it might be considered more as a verb – housing as the activity of meeting basic needs for shelter. As such, this process is frequently undertaken by users themselves, in the informal settlements which surround most cities. While these settlements were once regarded as a threat to the urban order (or urbanization), today there is increasing recognition that self-build and self-managed housing meets the needs of urban development in ways which are usually more sustainable as well as lower-cost than standard housing schemes (whether in the public or the private sector). This paper begins from the question as to how far the lessons of informal settlements in the South can be applied in the North. It looks at the status of informal settlements in the new South Africa, and at two schemes in the UK: the Coin Street development in London, managed by tenants; and Ashley Vale self-build housing in Bristol, in southwest England. These are not seen as exemplary but simply two cases which can be compared and contrasted in the terrain of new approaches to building cities for the future.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Malcolm Miles
MALCOLM MILES
Professor of Cultural Theory in The School of Architecture, Design and Environment at the University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.
E-mail: [email protected]
He is author of Eco-aesthetics: art, literature and architecture in a period of climate change (forthcoming 2014), Herbert Marcuse: an aesthetics of liberation (2011) and Cities and Cultures (2007), and has contributed to journals including Urban Studies, Cultural Geographies and The Journal of Architecture. His current research is in a critical reappraisal of the cultural turn in urbanism since the 1980s, and a reconsideration of modernism in art, literature and architecture.