258
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluation of Stability Using One Versus Three Tubes for Each Quality Control Concentration in Matrix-Based Bioanalysis

, , , &
Pages 1823-1834 | Received 28 Aug 2019, Accepted 23 Sep 2019, Published online: 28 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Aim: Contract research organizations and pharmaceutical firms have performed stability testing using one of two methods: storing in the freezer a single tube of matrix for each quality control concentration (Method 1), followed by aliquoting and analysis; and storing three tubes for each quality control concentration, followed by analysis (Method 2). This research project was conducted to determine if there were detectable differences between Method 1 and Method 2. Methodology: Five model drugs were selected: teriflunomide (stable compound) and acetyl salicylic acid, simvastatin, tenofovir alafenamide and valganciclovir (stability concerns). Samples were stored at -80°C for 1, 3 and 12 months and then analyzed. Samples were also placed at different locations within the freezer. Results: For the drugs tested, the results suggest that there is no significant difference in the outcome of stability testing, regardless whether Method 1 or Method 2 was followed.

Supplementary data

To view the supplementary data that accompany this paper please visit the journal website at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/suppl/10.2144/000112170

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the support received from Dr S Kassim, Director, Office of Study Integrity and Surveillance, CDER, FDA, which made this project possible, and B Folian, Regulatory Counsel, Office of Scientific Investigations, CDER, FDA, for his helpful comments and edits of this manuscript.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the official views or policies of the FDA.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 346.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.