820
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article Addendum

Static magnetic field accelerates aging and development in nematode

, &
Pages 528-529 | Received 17 Jun 2010, Accepted 17 Jun 2010, Published online: 01 Nov 2010

Abstract

Electro-magnetic fields are everywhere in our life. The strength and duration of human exposure is proportional to the degree of industrialization. The possible health hazard has been investigated for decades. C. elegans (nematode) has been a sensitive tool to study aging and development. The current study investigated the possible effects of static magnetic fields (SMFs) on the developmental and aging processes of C. elegans. Nematodes were grown in the presence of SMFs of strengths varying from 0 to 200 mT. Treatment with a 200 mT SMF reduced the development times from L2 to young adult by approximately 20%. After SMF treatment, the average lifespan was reduced from 31 days to 25 days for wild-type nematodes. The up-regulation of genes associated with development and aging was verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Nematodes carrying mutation in these genes also exhibited resistance to the SMFs treatment. Apparently, induction of gene expression is selective and dose-dependent. SMFs accelerate nematode development and shorten nematode lifespan through pathways associated with let-7, clk-1, unc-3, and age-1.

This article refers to:

We live on a big magnet; the terrestrial magnetism is about 30∼60 µT.Citation1 The magnetic force around our life can be more than 1,000 times stronger than the Earth's natural magnetic field. And the magnet is applied to our life, clinical practice, soil contamination detection, and so on. The magnetic strength of the instruments for medical treatment, like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic nanoparticles, is higher than 3 T. And the strength becomes stronger for higher resolution application. The hazardous effects associated with SMF on human health have become conspicuous. The increase of human exposure to magnetic fields (including static magnetic fields, pulsed electromagnetic fields and alternating electromagnetic fields), due to the use of electrical appliances such as microwave oven, cellular phone or increasingly powerful medical instrument, has prompted investigations into the effects of magnetic fields on living organisms.

The safety of static magnetic fields (SMFs) has been discussed for decades.Citation2 Various studies have examined the effects of SMFs, but their results were often inconclusive.Citation3 SMFs alone do not have a lethal effect on the basic properties of cell growth and survival under normal culture conditions.Citation4,Citation5 Early studies did not show any effect of the exposure to SMFs on the organogenesis, fetal development or cortical development of mice.Citation6Citation9 However, SMFs may cause minor effects at the cellular level that then accumulate and eventually cause distinct symptoms.

Until recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) proposed that SMFs might affect embryonic development in amphibians.Citation10 Morphological analyses indicated that SMFs could induce modifications in cell shape, the cell surface and the cytoskeleton.Citation11Citation18 SMFs have been reported to be toxic to rat embryos,Citation19 and have been reported to cause significant time and dose-dependent increases in the frequency of micronuclei in miceCitation20 and in the rates of germination and early growth in Cicer arietinum L.Citation21 The abnormal growth and increased incidence of malformations in embryos exposed to a static field of 1 T have been observed.Citation22,Citation23

Static Magnetic Field Accelerates Aging Process in Nematodes

C. elegans has been a powerful tool to study current interests in aging and development. Decline in lifespan and physiological processesCitation24Citation28 are important index of aging. Under the laboratory condition, SMF at strength of 200 mT is sufficient to accelerate developmental process of nematodes. Time required from larva to adult is shortened by approximately 20 to 30%. SMF also shortens the lifespan of nematode by ∼20%.

The advantage of nematode as genetic model is the large number of mutants available in the library upon request. It is of particular interest that some mutant nematodes are resistant to the SMF treatment, such as clk-1, lim-7, daf-2 and age-1 genes which are associated with development and aging; however, these genes belong to distinct pathways within the development and aging processes. The upregulation of clk-1, lim-7, daf-2, unc-3 and age-1 after SMF treatment was verified by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Lifespan analyses revealed that the let-7, unc-3 and age-1 mutants were not affected by SMF treatment. Apparently, induction of gene expression by SMFs is selective and dose-dependent. The genetic analysis of mutant nematode indicates that the effect of SMF is very likely global.

Is the decline of physiological processes in nematode analogous to aging processes in human? For an averaged lifespan of 80 years, 20% reduction could mean in 16 years shorter than normal lifespan under the influence of 200 mT field strength. Under laboratory condition, nematodes live constantly under the magnetic field. For human, this may not be true. However, the abnormality in gene expression indicated that this hazardous effect might be accumulative. Since long-term survey in public health could not provide conclusive evidence, further study applying nematode may shed a light on the revealing of molecular mechanism involved in the SMF-induced health hazard and possible cure to this situation.

References

  • Phillips T. Mystery of The Giant Ribbon, Solved?. NASA SCIENCE News 2010; (science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/15jan_ibex2/)
  • Drinker CK, Thomson RM. Does the magnetic field constitute an industrial hazard?. J Ind Hyg 1921; 3:117 - 129
  • Valentina H, Giulio G, Nicola V, Massimo L, Luigi L, Silvana S. Biological effects and safety in magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009; 6:1778 - 1798
  • Nakahara T, Yaguchi H, Yoshida M, Miyakoshi J. Effects of exposure of CHO-K1 cells to a 10-T static magnetic field. Radiology 2002; 224:817 - 822
  • Sakurai T, Terashima S, Miyakoshi J. Effects of strong static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging on insulin-secreting cells. Bioelectromagnetics 2009; 30:1 - 8
  • Sikov MR, Mahlum DD, Montgomery LD, Decker JR. Phillips RD, Gillis MF, Kaune WT, Mahlum DD. Development of mice after intrauterine exposure to direct-current magnetic fields. Biological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. 18th Hanford Life Sci. Symp., Richland, Washington, Springfield, Virginia, US Dept. of Energy, Nat Tech Info Service 1979; 462 - 473
  • Konermann G, Monig H. Studies on the influence of static magnetic fields on prenatal development of mice. Radiologie 1986; 26:490 - 497
  • Murakami J, Torii Y, Masuda K. Fetal development of mice following intrauterine exposure to a static magnetic field of 6.3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 10:433 - 437
  • Okazaki R, Ootsuyama A, Uchida S, Norimura T. Effects of a 4.7T static magnetic field on fetal development in ICR Mice. J Radiat Res 2001; 42:273 - 283
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-Ionising Radiation. Part 1, Static and Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Electric and Magnetic Fields 2002; IARC 80
  • Yamaguchi H, Hosokawa K, Soda A, Miyamoto H, Kinouchi Y. Effects of seven months' exposure to a static 0.2 T magnetic field on growth and glycolytic activity of human gingival fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993; 1156:302 - 306
  • Buemi M, Marino D, Di Pasquale G, Floccari F, Senatore M, Aloisi C, et al. Cell proliferation/cell death balance in renal cell cultures after exposure to a static magnetic field. Nephron 2001; 87:269 - 273
  • Teodori L, Grabarek J, Smolewski P, Ghibelli L, Bergamaschi A, De Nicola M, et al. Exposure of cells to static magnetic field accelerates loss of integrity of plasma membrane during apoptosis. Cytometry 2002; 49:113 - 118
  • Pacini S, Gulisano M, Peruzzi B, Sgambati E, Gheri G, Gher BS, et al. Effects of 0.2 T static magnetic field on human skin fibroblasts. Cancer Detect Prev 2003; 27:327 - 332
  • Pagliara P, Lanubile R, Dwikat M, Abbro L, Dini L. Differentiation of monocytic U937 cells under static magnetic field exposure. Eur J Histochem 2005; 49:75 - 86
  • Pate K, Benghuzzi H, Tucci M, Puckett A, Cason Z. Morphological evaluation of MRC-5 fibroblasts after stimulation with static magnetic field and pulsating electromagnetic field. Biomed Sci Instrum 2003; 39:460 - 465
  • Tarantino P, Lanubile R, Lacalandra G, Abbro L, Dini L. Postcontinuous whole body exposure of rabbits to 650 MHz electromagnetic fields: effects on liver, spleen and brain. Radiat Environ Biophys 2005; 44:51 - 59
  • Gamboa OL, Gutierrez PM, Alcalde I, De la Fuente I, Gayoso MJ. Absence of relevant effects of 5 mT static magnetic field on morphology, orientation and growth of a rat Schwann cell line in culture. Histol Histopathol 2007; 22:777 - 780
  • Mevissen M, Butenkotter S, Loscher W. Effects of static and timevarying (50 Hz) magnetic fields on reproduction and fetal development in rats. Teratology 1994; 50:229 - 237
  • Suzuki Y, Ikehata M, Nakamura K, Nishioka M, Asanuma K, Koana T, et al. Induction of micro-nuclei in mice exposed to static magnetic fields. Mutagenesis 2001; 16:499 - 501
  • Ananta V, Shantha N. Exposure of seeds to static magnetic field enhances germination and early growth characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Bioelectromagnetics 2008; 29:571 - 578
  • Neurath PW. High gradient magnetic field inhibits embryonic development of frogs. Nature 1968; 219:1358 - 1359
  • Ueno S, Umar H, Bambauer HJ, Ueck M. Ultracytochemical localization of Ca2+-ATPase activity in the paraphyseal epithelial cells of the frog, Rana esculenta. Cell Tissue Res 1984; 235:3 - 11
  • Bolanowski MA, Russell RL, Jacobson LA. Quantitative measures of aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. I. Population and longitudinal studies of two behavioral parameters. Mech Ageing Dev 1981; 15:279 - 295
  • Hosono R, Sato Y, Aizawa SI, Mitsui Y. Age-dependent changes in mobility and separation of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol 1980; 15:285 - 289
  • Johnson TE, Friedman DB. A mutation in the AGE-1 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans lengthens life and reduces hermaphrodite fertility. Genetics 1988; 118:75 - 86
  • Herndon LA, Schmeissner PJ, Dudaronek JM, Brown PA, Listner KM, Sakano Y, et al. Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans. Nature 2002; 419:808 - 814
  • Huang C, Xiong C, Kornfeld K. Measurements of age-related changes of physiological processes that predict lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:8084 - 8089