5,996
Views
136
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in Europe and its prevention by available vaccines

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1163-1171 | Received 28 Nov 2012, Accepted 28 Jan 2013, Published online: 01 Feb 2013

Abstract

Tick-borne Encephalitis (TBE), which is caused by a Flavivirus, is the most common tick-transmitted disease in Central and Eastern Europe and Russia. Today, TBE is endemic in 27 European countries, and has become an international public health problem. The epidemiology of TBE is changing owing to various factors, such as improvements in diagnosis and case reporting, increased recreational activities in areas populated by ticks, and changes in climatic conditions affecting tick habitats. Vaccination remains the most effective protective measure against TBE for people living in risk zones, occupationally exposed subjects and travelers to endemic areas. The vaccines currently in use are FSME-Immun®, Encepur®, EnceVir® and TBE vaccine Moscow®. The numerous studies performed on the efficacy and safety of these vaccines have shown a high level of immunogenicity and an excellent safety profile. Several studies have also shown a high level of cross-protection among strains belonging to different subtypes.

 

In the present paper we attempted to describe the continuously changing epidemiology of TBE in European States and to overview clinical development of available vaccines paying particular attention on cross-protection elicited by the vaccines.

Introduction

In Europe, tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) has been known since 1931, when an outbreak of an “acute epidemic serous meningitis” was reported in south-eastern Austria.Citation1 The causative agent was first isolated in 1937 in the former Soviet Union;Citation2 subsequently, in 1949, it was isolated outside Russia.Citation3

This zoonotic disease is endemic to a wide area, from Alsace-Lorraine and Scandinavia to North-Eastern China and Northern Japan.Citation4-Citation11 It is caused by the TBE virus (TBEV)Citation2-Citation13 belonging to family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus.Citation14 The TBEV is a member of the mammalian tick-borne Flavivirus group (the TBEV serocomplex), which includes Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus, Langat virus, Alkhurma hemorrhagic fever virus, Kyasanur Forest disease virus, Powassan virus, Royal Farm virus, Karshi virus, Gadgets Gully virus and Louping ill virus.Citation15,Citation16 TBEV has a linear positive-stranded RNA genome that consists of a single open reading frame encoding for one polyprotein, which is the precursor of three structural proteins — E (envelope), C (capsid) and M (membrane) — and seven non-structural proteins.Citation10

TBEV can be divided into three subtypes: European (TBEV-Eu), Siberian (TBEV-Sib) and Far Eastern (TBEV-Fe).Citation7,Citation14 TBEV-Eu circulates in Western, Central, Northern and Eastern Europe; TBEV-Sib occurs mainly in the Asian parts of Russia, and TBEV-Fe is prevalent in China, Japan and eastern Russia.Citation5

Moreover, on the basis of the determination of the primary structure of fragments of genes of E protein and on the basis of experiments with genotype-specific hybridization probes, the existence of a greater number of TBEV genotypes has been demonstrated.Citation17,Citation18 In particular, the strain 886–84 has its own genetic structure, which is different from the above-mentioned 3 subtypes. Likewise, the strain 178–79, which has been recently isolated in the Irkutsk Region (Siberia), presents substantial differences from the 3 subtypes.Citation17

It is estimated that TBE is one of the most serious neurological diseases transmitted by tick bites in Central Europe, Eastern Europe and Russia, and that it has a significant impact on public health in these geographical regions.Citation19 In the present paper, we attempted to describe the continuously changing epidemiology of TBE in European States, classified in accordance with the United Nations groupings,Citation20 and to overview the clinical development of available vaccines, with particular attention to the cross-protection elicited by these vaccines. Another aim was to point out vaccination policies in single countries, not least in the light of increased international travel.

Virus Transmission

TBEV is transmitted by 11 tick species, but only 2 species are important vectors: Ixodes ricinus for TBEV-Eu and Ixodes persulcatus for TBEV-Sib and TBEV-Fe.Citation4,Citation5,Citation11 Ixodes ricinus is found in many parts of Europe, extending as far as Turkey, Northern Iran and the Southeastern Caucasus. Ixodes persulcatus is widespread in Eastern Europe, Siberia and as far east as Japan and China.Citation5,Citation11,Citation21 Ixodes ricinus overlaps with Ixodes persulcatus in an area extending from the Baltic States to the Urals.Citation5,Citation22 Consequently, in the Baltic States and Finland the three TBEV subtypes co-circulate and the genetic diversity of the virus is very complex.Citation23,Citation24

Several animals, principally small rodents, deer, sheep and goats, act as the ticks’ source of infection, whereas in the tick population TBEV is transmitted by feeding/co-feeding on the same host, trans-ovarial (transmission from infected females to their eggs) and trans-stadial (transmission from one metamorphosis phase to another: larva, nymph and adult tick) routes and, perhaps, by sexual transmission.Citation25-Citation27 Horizontal transmission between ticks and their vertebrate reservoir host is necessary for virus survival; an infected tick remains infected for life.Citation11,Citation25 In addition, migratory birds can carry passively infected ticks, even for great distances.Citation28,Citation29

In majority of cases, human infections are caused by an infected tick’s bite.Citation5,Citation7-Citation9 All three tick stages can transmit the infection to humans.Citation30 In about 30% of cases, the tick bite remains unperceived.Citation31 Another important route of virus transmission is through the consumption of unpasteurized dairy products from viremic livestock, mainly goat’s milk.Citation32,Citation33 For instance, about 0.9% of TBE cases in the Czech Republic are linked to the alimentary route of transmission.Citation5 In October 2011 in Hungary, an outbreak of 7 confirmed and 4 suspected TBE cases may have been caused by the consumption of unpasteurized cow’s milk.Citation33 In addition, a few cases of laboratory-acquired infection through needle-prick injury or the inhalation of infected aerosol have been reported.Citation11 Vertical transmission and transmission through blood and blood products have not been described.Citation5

The maximum incidence of infection in humans coincides with seasonal feeding peaks of ticks, and is closely associated with their biology and ecology. In Central Europe, where the dominant species is Ixodes ricinus, the peak incidence of TBE occurs between May and June and between September and October. Ixodes persulcatus, which is widespread in the Urals, Siberia and the Far East, has a peak feeding period only between May and June.Citation34

Epidemiology in Europe

Over the past decades, TBE has become a growing public health concern in Europe and other parts of the world. The incidence of clinical cases is reported to be between 10,000 and 15,000 per year worldwide,Citation35 though it is very probably underestimatedCitation36,Citation37 because notification of the disease is not mandatory in all countries. Indeed, TBE is a notifiable disease in 17 European countries ().Citation5,Citation11,Citation24,Citation29,Citation38-Citation44 It is important to note that TBE has recently joined the diseases under surveillance in the European Union; on 5 September 2012 it was included in the list of notifiable diseases in the European Union.Citation45

Table 1. Annual number of cases of TBE in the decade 2001–2010, TBE notification and vaccination program by country

The incidence of TBE appears to be increasing; this could be due to several reasons: improvements in the diagnosis and reporting of TBE cases, increased recreational activities in areas inhabited by infected ticks, and changes in climatic conditions affecting tick habitats.Citation11 Some regions, such as Scandinavia, have seen an increasing trend in TBE cases.Citation46-Citation48

TBE is currently endemic in 27 European countries.Citation40 Furthermore, several new foci have recently been detected in different countries: 1 focus in Germany, 5 in the Slovak Republic, 3 in Austria and 12 in Switzerland.Citation49

Western Europe

Before the introduction of a massive TBE vaccination campaign in 1981, Austria had the highest recorded TBE morbidity rate in Europe, with up to 700 patients being hospitalized per year.Citation50 In 2010, 58 cases were diagnosed (0.7/100,000).Citation39 However, owing to the persistence of highly endemic areas in the south and east (such as Styria, Carinthia, South of Vienna, Salzburg, Burgenland, etc),Citation41 Austria remains a high-risk country for international tourists.Citation51

The main endemic zones in Germany include some southern parts of the country and, in particular, Bavaria (Schwandorf district) and Baden-Württemberg (Ortenaukreis district), where the incidence reaches 10.0/100,000 and 6.2/100,000, respectively.Citation52 Other risk areas are the federal states of Hesse, Rhineland-Palatinate and Thuringia. However, only four federal states in the north of Germany (Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg, Bremen, Berlin) have had no cases of TBE.Citation53

In Switzerland, natural TBE foci have been found throughout the country.Citation51 Like other countries, Switzerland has seen a marked increase in reported cases, which rose by 81% from 2005 to 2006.Citation54,Citation55

In France, the first case was diagnosed in 1968; since then, 5–10 cases have occurred annually, mainly in Alsace-Lorraine, in the northeastern part of the country. Moreover, some cases have been observed in the French Alpine region – probably caused by the consumption of goat’s milk cheese –and at least one case in Aquitaine, in southwestern France.Citation56,Citation57

Northern Europe

All Baltic states are highly endemic and all three TBEV subtypes co-circulate.Citation23,Citation58 TBE is currently endemic throughout Latvia, the highest incidences (47–55/100,000) occurring mainly in the central regions of the country.Citation59 In Estonia, the incidence fell from 27.8/100,000 in 1997 to 6.7/100,000 in 2008. In this period, the areas at highest risk were the north (Harju region), northeast (Ida-Viru region) and a group of islands off the west coast of the country; however, TBE foci are found nationwide.Citation60 In Lithuania, as in Latvia, TBE occurs throughout the country, especially the central regions. The incidence of TBE has increased since the 1990s, and during the period 2000–2011 a total of 4,814 cases of TBE were reported.Citation61

In Finland, approximately 20–40 new cases of TBE per year are currently being recorded; about two thirds of these occur in the Åland Islands, where the incidence of TBE ranged from 7 to 93 new cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 1990–2010. However, owing to active vaccination in Åland, which has reached about 65% coverage, the geographical distribution of TBE cases has changed, and nowadays most cases occur in mainland Finland (Kokkola, Lappeenranta).Citation41,Citation62

Norwegian endemic foci are concentrated along the southern coast. Since the first case, which occurred in 1998, more than 50 cases have been registered to date.Citation63

The incidence of TBE has seen a rapid increase in Sweden, reaching 1.7/100,000 nationwide. However, TBE is restricted to a few zones (Baltic coastal regions, around lakes in southern Sweden and on the west coast), where a rate of 9.3/100,000 (in Södermanland) has been recorded.Citation42

In Denmark, TBE occurs on the island of Bornholm in the Baltic sea, where the annual incidence reaches 4.0/100,000. However, in 2009, two laboratory-confirmed cases of TBE were registered outside Bornholm, thus confirming the spread of TBEV in Scandinavia.Citation64,Citation65

Southern Europe

Slovenia is endemic for TBE, its incidence is high and vaccination coverage is low. TBE cases occur in all regions, but the most seriously affected are situated in the north and northwest, in particular Gorenjska (57.2/100,000) and Koroska (76.9/100,000).Citation66

TBE is endemic in the Italian Northeast: in the Provinces of Trento, Bolzano, Belluno, Pordenone, Udine, Treviso and Vicenza. The mean annual incidence of TBE in these seven provinces increased from 0.06/100,000 in 1992 to 0.88/100,000 in 2006. Most cases were registered in 2000–2006 (151 cases out of 198, or 76.3%).Citation67,Citation68

In Romania, TBE is endemic in the Transylvania Region (Mures and Sibiu) in the North West; seroepidemiological investigations have revealed the prevalence of historical TBE infection, which was estimated to be 0.6%.Citation41,Citation69,Citation70

From only one focus located in the northern Croatia, TBE has recently spread along the Adriatic coast and to the islands;Citation5 the incidence peaked at 1.0/100,000 in 2009.Citation39

Some cases of TBE have been detected in Serbia (Belgrade area and Adriatic coast) and Bosnia-Herzegovina (in the north) and some of these have been linked to alimentary infection.Citation5 Southern Albanian areas are also endemic (districts of Permet and Gjirocaster).Citation5 It has been shown that, in northern Greece, a flavivirus of the TBEV serocomplex circulates; this has caused isolated clinical cases in the Thessaloniki Region.Citation5,Citation71

Eastern Europe

A high incidence (6.19/100,000) was registered in the Czech Republic in 2000–2009. While natural foci are disseminated in almost all parts of the country, the greatest numbers of cases occur in highland areas. In this country, the alimentary route of transmission is important and accounts for approximately 0.9% of cases, with 64 clinical cases from 1997 to 2008.Citation5,Citation72

In the Slovak Republic, TBE is endemic in western and north-western areas. Moreover, there are several foci in the center and the east of the country.Citation41 From 1998–2007, the mean annual number of TBE cases was 67 (ranging from 46 to 92).Citation55

Hungarian endemic zones are mostly located in the north and west of the country.Citation72 In recent years, several clinical cases have been associated with the consumption of raw goat and cow milk.Citation33

In Poland, infection occurs in all parts of the country, though the areas mostly affected are the North-East (Podlaskie and Warminsko-Mazurskie provinces) and South-West (Opolskie province). In these provinces, the average 5-y incidence in 2004–2008 was 9.3, 5.4 and 0.8 per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively.Citation73

TBEV circulation in Belarus has been detected in almost the entire country, the maximum incidence of 9.1/100,000 being recorded in 2006. The most intensive natural foci have been found in the western areas (Brest and Grodno Oblasts).Citation74

In Ukraine, at least 3 endemic zones have been detected: Crimea and Zaporizhia Oblast in the south and Volyn Oblast in the north west.Citation5,Citation43

Russia used to be a high-risk area, with about 10,000 cases being reported in 1996 and 1999.Citation55 TBE is endemic in at least 44 of the 83 federal subjects; these are located in both European and Asian areas, and some display a particularly high risk of infection. Indeed, the incidence of TBE reaches 72.5/100,000 inhabitants in the Tomsk Region and 53.5/100,000 in the Udmurt Republic.Citation5,Citation75

Finally, in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Spain, Portugal and Malta no autochthonous TBE cases have been registered to date.Citation52

summarizes epidemiological data from 17 European countries and reports information on TBE notification and vaccination policies.

It is important to underline that TBE has become an international public health problem, owing to the rise in travel to risk areas. According to the World Tourism Organization Network (WTON), Europe is the most popular travel destination in the world; indeed, international tourist arrivals in Europe are estimated to have exceeded 500 million in 2011 and are expected to increase by a further 2–4% in 2012.Citation76 It has been estimated that, in Austria alone, 60 overnight visitors may be infected every summer. Furthermore, the risk of TBEV infection among unvaccinated travelers to a highly endemic region is calculated to be 1/10,000.Citation77 The American Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report describes five cases of TBE in international travelers who visited endemic areas between 2000 and 2009; 2 cases were recorded in Russia, 1 case in China, 1 in the Czech Republic and 1 in Sweden.Citation78

Currently Available TBE Vaccines

The vaccines currently in use are FSME-Immun® (Baxter, Austria), Encepur® (Novartis Vaccines, Germany), EnceVir® (Scientific Production Association Microgen, Russia) and TBE vaccine Moscow® (Federal State Enterprise of Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Russia).Citation19 FSME-Immun® and Encepur® are available in the European Union and have been authorized by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).Citation79

The protective properties of these four killed whole vaccines are associated mostly with virions, particularly with the envelope protein E, which is responsible for important biological functions, such as virion assembly, membrane fusion and binding to receptors. The development of inactivated vaccines has focused on improving immunogenicity and reducing allergic reactions; this has been achieved by concentrating and purifying the virions.Citation11,Citation80

FSME-Immun®

FSME-Immun®, which is based on the Neudoerfl strain, has been approved for the vaccination of risk groups since 1976.Citation81 In recent decades, the production process of the vaccine has undergone several modifications: the virus master bank has been changed from mouse brain to primary cells; excipients, especially stabilizers and preservatives, have been improved, and formulations for children have been developed.Citation82 FSME-Immun® contains human albumin as a stabilizer.Citation11 The conventional schedule of the primary vaccination course consists of 3 doses, administered intramuscularly (0.5 ml for adults and 0.25 ml for children aged 1–15 y). The recommended interval between the first and second dose is 1–3 mo, and between the second and the third dose 5–12 mo. Accelerated schedules can be implemented in emergency situations (vaccination on days 0 and 14, followed by a third dose 5–12 mo after the second). The primary 3-dose schedule may be followed by booster doses every 3–5 y.Citation11,Citation19,Citation83,Citation84

Several studies have been conducted on the immunogenicity of FSME-Immun® in both adults and children on a conventional schedule.Citation85-Citation89 In adults (16–65 y), the seroconversion rates were close to 100% after the third vaccination.Citation85,Citation86 Similarly, an excellent immunogenicity profile has been seen in the pediatric population aged up to 15 y, with seroconversion rates reaching 100% after completion of the primary immunization course.Citation87-Citation89 The rapid immunization schedule, which induces an early immune response, has been demonstrated to be suitable, as no difference in the level of antibody titers has been found after the third dose.Citation90 However, the rapid schedule elicits a less marked immune response than the conventional schedule after the second dose,Citation88 and antibodies have been seen to decline more rapidly.Citation91

The persistence of immunity following the complete primary vaccination has been shown to be long-lasting in both adults (antibodies titers of 95% after 3 y)Citation83 and children (antibodies titers of 98% after 3 y).Citation89

The results of numerous clinical trials have shown a good safety and tolerability profile of both FSME-Immun® formulations; systemic reactions have been observed mostly among children and were mild and transient.Citation85-Citation89 Postmarketing pharmacovigilance has reported a rate of severe adverse events of 1.6 per 100,000 doses.Citation92

Encepur®

The Encepur® vaccine is produced by using strain K23, which belongs to TBEV-Eu.Citation11,Citation19

The adult formulation of Encepur® was licensed in Germany in 1991 and contained a polygeline stabilizer;Citation11 the first licensed TBE vaccine for children was licensed in 1994 (Encepur® K).Citation93 Since 2001, the vaccine has not contained preservatives, protein-derived stabilizers or human serum albumin. The current formulations of the German vaccine are: Encepur® Adults (for subjects over 12 y of age) and Encepur® Children (for children aged 1–11 y). The conventional primary vaccination schedule is the same as for FSME-Immun® (on day 0, after 1–3 mo and after 9–12 mo); a rapid vaccination schedule consists of 3 doses on days 0, 7 and 21, and a first booster after 12–18 mo. Subsequent boosters can be administered every 3–5 y.Citation11,Citation19,Citation94

Like the Austrian vaccine, Encepur® was found to be highly immunogenic, with close to 100% seroconversion rates after concluding the primary conventional or rapid schedule in adults and children.Citation91,Citation93,Citation95 Interestingly, an advantage of the rapid schedule in children has been described, in that it provides rapid protection that lasts at least 300 d.Citation96

Rendi-Wagner et al.Citation97 reported the persistence of high antibody titers 3–5 y after the last vaccination dose in 96–100% of subjects.

The German vaccine is safe and well-tolerated, the rate of severe adverse events being 1.9 per 100,000 administered doses on postmarketing surveillance.Citation92

Regarding the two above-mentioned vaccines, a dose of either one may be successfully followed by a dose of the other, as shown by Prymula et al.Citation98 Thus, subjects who received either FSME-Immun® Junior or Encepur® Children vaccine for the first two vaccinations and FSME-Immun® Junior for the third showed a comparably strong immune response, regardless of the previous TBE vaccine administered.Citation98

Although regular booster TBE vaccinations every 3–5 y are recommended, recent data from clinical studies suggest that TBE antibodies persist at high levels for longer than the currently recommended intervals.Citation94

Russian vaccines

EnceVir® and TBE vaccine Moscow® are used only in the Russian Federation and some post-Soviet Republics.Citation19 EnceVir® is based on TBEV-Fe strain 205, and TBE vaccine Moscow® is based on the Sofjin strain (TBEV-Fe). Both vaccines contain human albumin as a stabilizer. A pediatric formulation is available only for TBE vaccine Moscow®. The conventional vaccination schedule is the same for both vaccines: the second dose is administered 5–7 mo after the first one, and a third dose 6–12 mo thereafter completes the primary series. Boosters are given at intervals of three years.Citation99 However, the two Russian vaccines have not undergone randomized, controlled clinical trials of their efficacy and effectiveness.Citation11

Cross-Protection

All three TBEV subtypes are closely related at the genetic level,Citation100 and can co-circulate, as in Baltic countries.Citation23,Citation58 Surface viral protein E induces the production of neutralizing antibodies, which play an important role in establishing a protective immune response in the host.Citation10,Citation101 Furthermore, a role of protective immunity has been associated with the NS protein (NS1), one of the seven non-structural proteins.Citation102 However, neutralizing cross-reactive antibodies mostly recognize protein E epitopes.Citation10,Citation101 No data are available on cellular responses.Citation102 It is important to note that the glycoprotein E can vary by about 2% in the same subtype and by about 5% between different subtypes.Citation100 These data suggest that vaccines based on TBEV-Eu may also be effective against other subtypes, and vice versa. The question of whether a vaccine based on TBEV-Eu may be protective toward TBEV-Sib and TBEV-Fe is of great importance in view of the increase in international travel and the spread of non-European subtypes. Indeed, TBEV-Sib, which is widespread in Asia, has been found in Finland.Citation24

Preclinical studies on the immunization of animals have revealed a high level of cross-protection between strains belonging to different subtypes. Holzmann et al. found no statistically significant difference in the degree of protection when mice were immunized with a European prototype vaccine virus and subsequently challenged with three selected Asian isolates and one isolate from the European part of the former Soviet Union.Citation103

Chiba et al. demonstrated a high level of survival of mice after vaccination with 2 doses of a European TBE vaccine (FSME-Immun®) and subsequent challenge with 100 median lethal doses (LD50) of three different TBEV strains (Oshima 5–10 – TBEV-Fe, Hochosterwitz – TBEV-Eu and Sofjin – TBEV-Fe). The percentage of survival was 80% among mice challenged with Oshima 5–10 and Hochosterwitz strains, and 100% among those challenged with the Sofjin strain.Citation104

A recent study by Fritz et al. on a mouse model revealed that the cross-protective responses elicited by FSME-Immun® and two Russian vaccines against heterologous strains were similar to those induced against the respective homologous vaccine strains.Citation105

Hayasaka et al. demonstrated that the European vaccine (FSME-Immun®) induced efficient NT antibodies in humans and protective immune responses in mice against various isolates of TBEV found in eastern Siberian and Far-Eastern regions of Russia, and that the European vaccine could prevent TBE in humans in those regions.Citation106

A Russian study has shown that Encepur® induces a marked humoral immune response toward heterogeneous strains of TBEV-Fe (P-69, P-202 and P-73). Specifically, the percentages of adult volunteers who had neutralizing antibodies against the three different strains after triple immunization were: 63.9% for P-69, 95.5% for P-73 and 97.6% for P-202.Citation101

In 2009, Leonova et al. compared the immunogenicity of TBE vaccine Moscow®, EnceVir®, FSME-Immun® and Encepur® in adults. Immunogenicity was measured 2–5 mo and 2 y after the administration of 3 doses of the respective vaccines. All vaccines induced neutralizing antibodies against the P-73 strain of TBEV-Fe. In the case of TBE vaccine Moscow®, antibodies were detected in 100% and 94% of vaccinees after 2–5 mo and 2 y, respectively. With EnceVir®, the corresponding figures were 88% and 84%; with FSME-Immun®, 88.2% and 78.1%, and with Encepur® 100% and 100%.Citation107

Orlinger et al. quantified neutralizing antibodies against prototype TBEV strains of all subtypes (Neudoerfl - TBEV-Eu, K23 - TBEV-Eu, Sofjin HO - TBEV-Fe, Oshima 5–10 - TBEV-Fe, and Vasilchenko - TBEV-Sib) and Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus by using hybrid viruses encoding their respective surface proteins. Seropositivity rates were 100% against the hybrids Neudoerfl, K23, Sofjin HO, Oshima 5–10 and Vasilchenko, and 98% against the hybrid Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus. The authors concluded that FSME-Immun® protects fully against all TBEV subtypes, and less potently against the more distantly related Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus.Citation108

Concluding Remarks

Vaccination is the most effective protective measure against TBE.Citation19 The WHO and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) recommend TBE vaccination for people who live in TBE risk areas or who frequently visit forests and grasslands in TBE risk areas.Citation19,Citation109 Where the mean 5-y incidence of disease is moderate/low, i.e., less than 5 cases per 100,000, or limited to certain areas, immunization should be provided for high-risk groups.Citation19

TBE vaccination is currently included (under certain conditions) in official government vaccination programs in several European countries (). In Austria, where the vaccination program has been implemented, a good coverage rate has been achieved, with 88% of the total population having received at least one dose of the vaccine and 58% being within the officially recommended vaccination schedule.Citation110 This has led to a marked reduction in the annual number of clinical cases and proves that vaccination is an effective means of preventing TBE.Citation111 Indeed, in the period 2000–2011, about 4,000 cases were prevented.Citation112 Furthermore, immunization against TBE has also proved cost-effective.Citation113,Citation114 By contrast, other highly endemic countries have insufficient vaccine coverage rates: Latvia 39% (2008), Estonia 20% (2008), Lithuania 19% (2008), Switzerland 17% (2007), the Czech Republic 16% (2009), Slovenia 13% (2009) and Sweden 13% (2008).Citation115

Vaccination policies are in continuous evolution in different European countries. For example, the recent 2012–2014 Italian National Vaccine Plan for the first time recommends TBE vaccination for people living in high risk areas and for professionally exposed persons.Citation38

Travelers to endemic areas should also be vaccinated, especially if their visits include outdoor activities. Since the incidence of TBE varies widely among geographic regions, public health vaccination strategies should be based on careful analysis of the effectiveness of the vaccine and the cost-effectiveness of immunization regimens.Citation116

As we have seen, both conventional and rapid schedules enable optimal protection to be achieved after completion of a course. However, while the rapid schedule elicits an earlier response than the conventional schedule, the duration of this response is shorter. Therefore, the rapid scheme could be implemented, for example, for short-term travelers, while the conventional one is more suitable for people exposed to TBE for the whole tick-season.Citation91

In conclusion, given the availability of safe and effective vaccines, it is advisable to increase vaccination coverage not only among people living in regions considered at risk of TBE, but also among travelers who plan to spend some time in countries where TBE is endemic.

Abbreviations:
C=

capsid

CISID=

the Centralized Information System for Infectious Diseases

E=

envelope

ECDC=

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

EMA=

European Medicines Agency

LD50=

median lethal dose

M=

membrane

NA=

not available

NS=

non-structural

RNA=

ribonucleic acid

TBE=

tick-borne encephalitis

TBEV=

tick-borne encephalitis virus

TBEV-Eu=

European subtype of the tick-borne encephalitis virus

TBEV-Fe=

Far Eastern subtype of the tick-borne encephalitis virus

TBEV-Sib=

Siberian subtype of the tick-borne encephalitis virus

WHO=

World Health Organization

WTON=

World Tourism Organization Network

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

D.A., A.D., D.P., P.L.L., M.L.C. and R.G. declare that they have no competing interests. U.A. is an employee of Baxter Healthcare.

References

  • Schneider H. Über epidemische akute. Klin Wochenschr 1931; 44:350 - 2
  • Silber LA, Soloviev VD. Far Eastern tick-borne spring-summer (spring) encephalitis. Am Rev Sov Med 1946; Suppl 1 - 80; PMID: 21002377
  • Gallia F, Rampas J, Hollender L. Laboratory infection caused by tick-borne encephalitis virus. Cas Lek Cesk 1949; 88:224 - 9
  • Süss J. Tick–borne encephalitis in Europe and beyond - the epidemiological situation as of 2007. Euro Surveill 2008; 13(26):pii=18916.
  • Süss J. Tick-borne encephalitis 2010: epidemiology, risk areas, and virus strains in Europe and Asia-an overview. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2011; 2:2 - 15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2010.10.007; PMID: 21771531
  • Kunz C. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe. Acta Leiden 1992; 60:1 - 14; PMID: 1485492
  • Lindquist L, Vapalahti O. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet 2008; 371:1861 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60800-4; PMID: 18514730
  • Hansmann Y, Gut JP, Remy V, Martinot M, Christmanna D. [TBE virus infection: clinical and epidemiological data]. Med Mal Infect 2004; 34:Suppl 1 S28 - 30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0399-077X(04)90009-1; PMID: 15676240
  • Mansfield KL, Johnson N, Phipps LP, Stephenson JR, Fooks AR, Solomon T. Tick-borne encephalitis virus - a review of an emerging zoonosis. J Gen Virol 2009; 90:1781 - 94; http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.011437-0; PMID: 19420159
  • Lindenbach BD, Rice CA. Flaviviridae: The viruses and their replication. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, eds. Fields virology. 4th edition. London, New York and Tokyo: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:991–1041.
  • Kollaritsch H, Krasilnikov V, Holzmann H, Karganova G, Barrett A, Suss J, et al. Background Document on Vaccines and Vaccination against Tick-borne Encephalitis (TBE). Available at: http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/6_TBE_backgr_18_Mar_net_apr_2011.pdf. January 3, 2013.
  • Dumpis U, Crook D, Oksi J. Tick-borne encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 28:882 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/515195; PMID: 10825054
  • Sips GJ, Wilschut J, Smit JM. Neuroinvasive flavivirus infections. Rev Med Virol 2012; 22:69 - 87; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.712; PMID: 22086854
  • International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Virus Taxonomy: 2011 Release. Available at: http://www.ictvonline.org/virusTaxonomy.asp?version=2011&bhcp=1. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • Theiler M, Downs WG. The Arthropod-Borne Viruses of Vertebrates. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.
  • Calisher CH. Antigenic classification and taxonomy of flaviviruses (family Flaviviridae) emphasizing a universal system for the taxonomy of viruses causing tick-borne encephalitis. Acta Virol 1988; 32:469 - 78; PMID: 2904743
  • Demina TV, Dzhioev YP, Verkhozina MM, Kozlova IV, Tkachev SE, Plyusnin A, et al. Genotyping and characterization of the geographical distribution of tick-borne encephalitis virus variants with a set of molecular probes. J Med Virol 2010; 82:965 - 76; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.21765; PMID: 20419810
  • Demina TV, Dzhioev IuP, Kozlova IV, Verkhozina MM, Tkachev SE, Doroshchenko EK, et al. [Genotypes 4 and 5 of the tick-borne encephalitis virus: features of the genome structure and possible scenario for its formation]. Vopr Virusol 2012; 57:13 - 9; PMID: 23012978
  • World Health Organization (WHO). Vaccines against tick-borne encephalitis: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2011; 86:241 - 56; PMID: 21661276
  • United Nations Statistics Division. Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • Žygutienė M. Tick-borne encephalitis - the most relevant to public health flavivirus infection in the EpiNorth region. EpiNorth 2011; 12:31 - 2
  • Randolph SE. Tick-borne encephalitis incidence in Central and Eastern Europe: consequences of political transition. Microbes Infect 2008; 10:209 - 16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2007.12.005; PMID: 18316221
  • Lundkvist k, Vene S, Golovljova I, Mavtchoutko V, Forsgren M, Kalnina V, et al. Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis virus from Latvia: evidence for co-circulation of three distinct subtypes. J Med Virol 2001; 65:730 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.2097; PMID: 11745938
  • Jääskeläinen AE, Tikkakoski T, Uzcátegui NY, Alekseev AN, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O. Siberian subtype tickborne encephalitis virus, Finland. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12:1568 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1210.060320; PMID: 17176574
  • Donoso-Mantke O, Karan LS, Růžek D. Tick-Borne encephalitis Virus: A General Overview. In: Růžek D, eds. Flavivirus Encephalitis. Rijeka: InTech, 2011:133-56.
  • Nuttall PA, Jones LD, Labuda M, Kaufman WR. Adaptations of arboviruses to ticks. J Med Entomol 1994; 31:1 - 9; PMID: 8158611
  • Danielová V, Holubová J, Pejcoch M, Daniel M. Potential significance of transovarial transmission in the circulation of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 2002; 49:323 - 5; PMID: 12641208
  • Waldenström J, Lundkvist A, Falk KI, Garpmo U, Bergström S, Lindegren G, et al. Migrating birds and tickborne encephalitis virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13:1215 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1308.061416; PMID: 17953095
  • Movila A, Alekseev AN, Dubinina HV, Toderas I. Detection of tick-borne pathogens in ticks from migratory birds in the Baltic region of Russia. Med Vet Entomol 2012; In press http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01037.x; PMID: 22924442
  • Baxter. Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE, FSME). Monograph. Vienna: 2007. Available at: http://www.tbe-info.com/upload/medialibrary/Monograph_TBE.pdf. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • Kaiser R. The clinical and epidemiological profile of tick-borne encephalitis in southern Germany 1994-98: a prospective study of 656 patients. Brain 1999; 122:2067 - 78; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.11.2067; PMID: 10545392
  • Kerbo N, Donchenko I, Kutsar K, Vasilenko V. Tickborne encephalitis outbreak in Estonia linked to raw goat milk, May-June 2005. Euro Surveill 2005; 10:E050623.2.
  • Caini S, Szomor K, Ferenczi E, Szekelyne Gaspar A, Csohan A, Krisztalovics K, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis transmitted by unpasteurised cow milk in western Hungary, September to October 2011. Euro Surveill 2012; 17:pii:20128.
  • Gritsun TS, Lashkevich VA, Gould EA. Tick-borne encephalitis. Antiviral Res 2003; 57:129 - 46; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3542(02)00206-1; PMID: 12615309
  • Dobler G. Zoonotic tick-borne flaviviruses. Vet Microbiol 2010; 140:221 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.024; PMID: 19765917
  • Kunze M, Kunze U. Social marketing and the establishment of the ISW-TBE. Vaccine 2003; 21:Suppl 1 S62 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00818-6; PMID: 12628816
  • Kunze U, ISW TBE. Conference report of the 10th meeting of the international scientific working group on tick-borne encephalitis (ISW-TBE): combating tick-borne encephalitis: vaccination rates on the rise. Vaccine 2008; 26:6738 - 40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.059; PMID: 19007838
  • Italian Ministry of Health. National Vaccine Plan 2012-2014. Available at: http://www.governoitaliano.it/backoffice/allegati/67507-7587.pdf. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • Tick-borne encephalitis incidence, the centralized information system for infectious diseases (CISID) – WHO. Available at: http://data.euro.who.int/cisid/?TabID=290643. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Epidemiological situation of tick-borne encephalitis in the European Union and European Free Trade Association countries. Stockholm: ECDC; 2012.
  • VENICE II. Tick-borne encephalitis surveillance systems and vaccination recommendations in UE/EEA, 2009. Collaboration between VENICE II project and ECDC. Available at: http://venice.cineca.org/final_report_TBE_19-01-2011.pdf. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • Lundkvist A, Wallensten A, Vene S, Hjertqvist M. Tick-borne encephalitis increasing in Sweden, 2011. Euro Surveill 2011; 16:pii=19981.
  • Incidence of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases in Ukraine in 2003. State Sanitary and Epidemiological Service of Ukraine. Available at: http://www.moz.gov.ua/ua/portal/pre_20040405_1.html. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • Donoso Mantke O, Escadafal C, Niedrig M, Pfeffer M, on behalf of the Working group for Tick-borne encephalitis virus. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe, 2007 to 2009. Euro Surveill 2011; 16:pii:19979.
  • Amato-Gauci A, Zeller H. Tick-borne encephalitis joins the diseases under surveillance in the European Union. Euro Surveill 2012; 17(42):pii=20299.
  • Jaenson TG, Hjertqvist M, Bergström T, Lundkvist A. Why is tick-borne encephalitis increasing? A review of the key factors causing the increasing incidence of human TBE in Sweden. Parasit Vectors 2012; 5:184; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-184; PMID: 22937961
  • Jääskeläinen AE, Sironen T, Murueva GB, Subbotina N, Alekseev AN, Castrén J, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus in ticks in Finland, Russian Karelia and Buryatia. J Gen Virol 2010; 91:2706 - 12; http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.023663-0; PMID: 20660147
  • Skarpaas T, Golovljova I, Vene S, Ljøstad U, Sjursen H, Plyusnin A, et al. Tickborne encephalitis virus, Norway and Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12:1136 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1207.051567; PMID: 16836835
  • Süss J. TBE – A Short Overview on Epidemiological Status in Europe. ISW-TBE 2012. Vienna, 2-3 February, 2012.
  • Kunz C. TBE vaccination and the Austrian experience. Vaccine 2003; 21:Suppl 1 S50 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00813-7; PMID: 12628814
  • Kunze U. Is there a need for a travel vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis?. Travel Med Infect Dis 2008; 6:380 - 3; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2008.06.004; PMID: 18984485
  • Dobler G, Gniel D, Petermann R, Pfeffer M. Epidemiology and distribution of tick-borne encephalitis. Wien Med Wochenschr 2012; 162:230 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-012-0100-5; PMID: 22699708
  • Eurosurveillance Editorial team. Updated Risk areas for tick borne encephalitis in Germany. Euro Surveill 2009;14(23):pii=19236.
  • Gäumann R, Růžek D, Mühlemann K, Strasser M, Beuret CM. Phylogenetic and virulence analysis of tick-borne encephalitis virus field isolates from Switzerland. J Med Virol 2011; 83:853 - 63; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.21993; PMID: 21412794
  • Petri E, Gniel D, Zent O. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) trends in epidemiology and current and future management. Travel Med Infect Dis 2010; 8:233 - 45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2010.08.001; PMID: 20970726
  • Collard M, Gut JP, Christmann D, Hirsch E, Nastorg G, Sellal F, et al. [Tick-borne encephalitis in Alsace]. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1993; 149:198 - 201; PMID: 8235212
  • Herpe B, Schuffenecker I, Pillot J, Malvy D, Clouzeau B, Bui N, et al. Tickborne encephalitis, southwestern France. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13:1114 - 6; PMID: 18214196
  • Šumilo D, Bormane A, Asokliene L, Lucenko I, Vasilenko V, Randolph S. Tick-borne encephalitis in the Baltic States: identifying risk factors in space and time. Int J Med Microbiol 2006; 296:Suppl 40 76 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.12.006; PMID: 16530480
  • Karelis G, Bormane A, Logina I, Lucenko I, Suna N, Krumina A, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in Latvia 1973-2009: epidemiology, clinical features and sequelae. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19:62 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03434.x; PMID: 21615626
  • Epstein E, Kutsar K. Epidemiological Trends of Tick-Borne Encephalitis in Estonia. EpiNorth 2009; 10:58 - 62
  • Žygutienė M, Čaplinskas S. Tick-borne diseases in Lithuania. The 2nd International Scientific Conference “Tick-Borne Diseases”, Vilnius, Lithuania, 12 April, 2012.
  • Jääskeläinen A, Korhonen T, Kuusi M, Vapalahti O. Tick-borne encephalitis in Finland. EpiNorth 2011; 12:40 - 3
  • Andreassen A, Jore S, Cuber P, Dudman S, Tengs T, Isaksen K, et al. Prevalence of tick borne encephalitis virus in tick nymphs in relation to climatic factors on the southern coast of Norway. Parasit Vectors 2012; 5:177; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-177; PMID: 22913287
  • Laursen K, Knudsen JD. Tick-borne encephalitis: a retrospective study of clinical cases in Bornholm, Denmark. Scand J Infect Dis 2003; 35:354 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365540310005305; PMID: 12875531
  • Fomsgaard A, Christiansen CB, Bødker R. First identification of tick-borne encephalitis in Denmark outside of Bornholm, August 2009. Euro Surveill 2009; 14:pii=19325.
  • Grgič-Vitek M, Klavs I. High burden of tick-borne encephalitis in Slovenia--challenge for vaccination policy. Vaccine 2011; 29:5178 - 83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.033; PMID: 21620916
  • Carpi G, Bertolotti L, Rosati S, Rizzoli A. Prevalence and genetic variability of tick-borne encephalitis virus in host-seeking Ixodes ricinus in northern Italy. J Gen Virol 2009; 90:2877 - 83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.013367-0; PMID: 19675189
  • Rizzoli A, Hauffe HC, Tagliapietra V, Neteler M, Rosà R. Forest structure and roe deer abundance predict tick-borne encephalitis risk in Italy. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4336; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004336; PMID: 19183811
  • Molnár GB, Persecă T, Feder A, Păcuraru D, Marialaki E, Cojan A. [Epidemiological assessment of morbidity and natural foci of TBE-CEE virus infection in Transylvania]. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2008; 112:471 - 7; PMID: 19295022
  • Paduraru OA, Buffet JP, Cote M, Bonnet S, Moutailler S, Paduraru V, et al. Zoonotic transmission of pathogens by Ixodes ricinus ticks, Romania. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18:2089 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1812.120711; PMID: 23171510
  • Pavlidou V, Geroy S, Diza E, Antoniadis A, Papa A. Epidemiological study of tick-borne encephalitis virus in northern Greece. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2007; 7:611 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2007.0107; PMID: 18171108
  • Kollaritsch H, Chmelík V, Dontsenko I, Grzeszczuk A, Kondrusik M, Usonis V, et al. The current perspective on tick-borne encephalitis awareness and prevention in six Central and Eastern European countries: report from a meeting of experts convened to discuss TBE in their region. Vaccine 2011; 29:4556 - 64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.061; PMID: 21549781
  • Stefanoff P, Rogalska J, Zajkowska J, Czerska M, Seroka W, Czarkowski MP. Surveillance of aseptic central nervous system infections in Poland: is it meeting its objectives? Euro Surveill 2011; 16:pii=19924.
  • Karaban I, Vedenkov A, Yashkova S, Sebut N. Epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme disease in the Republic of Belarus, 1998-2007. EpiNorth 2009; 10:48 - 57
  • Federal service on customers' rights protection and human well-being surveillance. Tick-borne encephalitis. Available at: http://rospotrebnadzor.ru/c/journal/view_article_content?groupId=10156&articleId=300858&version=1.0. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • World Tourism Organization UNWTO. Tourism highlights. 2012 Edition.
  • Kunze U. the ISW-TBE. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE): An underestimated risk…still: Report of the 14th Annual Meeting of the International Scientific Working Group on Tick-Borne Encephalitis (ISW-TBE). Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2012; 3:197-201.
  • Tick-Borne Encephalitis Among US, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Tick-borne encephalitis among U.S. travelers to Europe and Asia - 2000-2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010; 59:335 - 8; PMID: 20339345
  • Kollaritsch H. TBE vaccines: immunogenicity, effectiveness and safety. TBE SAGE meeting. Geneva, 11 April 2011. Available at: http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/SAGE_April_2011_tbe_Kollaritsch.pdf Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • Barrett PN, Schober-Bendixen S, Ehrlich HJ. History of TBE vaccines. Vaccine 2003; 21:Suppl 1 S41 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00814-9; PMID: 12628813
  • Kunz C, Hofmann H, Stary A. [Field studies with a new tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine]. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A 1976; 234:141 - 4; PMID: 1258565
  • Zent O, Bröker M. Tick-borne encephalitis vaccines: past and present. Expert Rev Vaccines 2005; 4:747 - 55; http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14760584.4.5.747; PMID: 16221075
  • Loew-Baselli A, Poellabauer EM, Pavlova BG, Fritsch S, Koska M, Bobrovsky R, et al. Seropersistence of tick-borne encephalitis antibodies, safety and booster response to FSME-IMMUN 0.5 ml in adults aged 18-67 years. Hum Vaccin 2009; 5:551 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/hv.5.8.8571; PMID: 19430202
  • Wittermann C, Schöndorf I, Gniel D. Antibody response following administration of two paediatric tick-borne encephalitis vaccines using two different vaccination schedules. Vaccine 2009; 27:1661 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.003; PMID: 18940221
  • Ehrlich HJ, Pavlova BG, Fritsch S, Poellabauer EM, Loew-Baselli A, Obermann-Slupetzky O, et al. Randomized, phase II dose-finding studies of a modified tick-borne encephalitis vaccine: evaluation of safety and immunogenicity. Vaccine 2003; 22:217 - 23; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00563-2; PMID: 14615149
  • Loew-Baselli A, Konior R, Pavlova BG, Fritsch S, Poellabauer E, Maritsch F, et al, FSME-IMMUN study group. Safety and immunogenicity of the modified adult tick-borne encephalitis vaccine FSME-IMMUN: results of two large phase 3 clinical studies. Vaccine 2006; 24:5256 - 63; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.061; PMID: 16624457
  • Ehrlich HJ, Loew-Baselli A, Poellabauer EM, Fritsch S, Mai I, Pavlova BG, et al. Randomized, phase II, multicenter dose-finding studies of a modified tick-borne encephalitis vaccine in children: evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of two vaccinations with FSME-Immun® “new. Int J Med Microbiol 2004; 293:Suppl 37 126 - 7
  • Pöllabauer EM, Pavlova BG, Löw-Baselli A, Fritsch S, Prymula R, Angermayr R, et al. Comparison of immunogenicity and safety between two paediatric TBE vaccines. Vaccine 2010; 28:4680 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.047; PMID: 20433803
  • Loew-Baselli A, Poellabauer EM, Pavlova BG, Fritsch S, Firth C, Petermann R, et al. Prevention of tick-borne encephalitis by FSME-IMMUN vaccines: review of a clinical development programme. Vaccine 2011; 29:7307 - 19; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.089; PMID: 21843576
  • Loew-Baselli A, Poellabauer EM, Fritsch S, Koska M, Vartian N, Himly C, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of FSME-IMMUN 0.5 ml using a rapid immunization schedule. Int J Med Microbiol 2006; 296:Suppl 1 213 - 4; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.019
  • Schöndorf I, Beran J, Cizkova D, Lesna V, Banzhoff A, Zent O. Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccination: applying the most suitable vaccination schedule. Vaccine 2007; 25:1470 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.028; PMID: 17196713
  • Kollaritsch H, Paulke-Korinek M, Holzmann H, Hombach J, Bjorvatn B, Barrett A. Vaccines and vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. Expert Rev Vaccines 2012; 11:1103 - 19; http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/erv.12.86; PMID: 23151167
  • Zent O, Banzhoff A, Hilbert AK, Meriste S, Słuzewski W, Wittermann Ch. Safety, immunogenicity and tolerability of a new pediatric tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine, free of protein-derived stabilizer. Vaccine 2003; 21:3584 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00421-3; PMID: 12922086
  • Plentz A, Jilg W, Schwarz TF, Kuhr HB, Zent O. Long-term persistence of tick-borne encephalitis antibodies in adults 5 years after booster vaccination with Encepur Adults. Vaccine 2009; 27:853 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.11.082; PMID: 19071180
  • Zent O, Beran J, Jilg W, Mach T, Banzhoff A. Clinical evaluation of a polygeline-free tick-borne encephalitis vaccine for adolescents and adults. Vaccine 2003; 21:738 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00592-3; PMID: 12531352
  • Schoendorf I, Ternak G, Oroszlàn G, Nicolay U, Banzhoff A, Zent O. Tick-born encephalitis (TBE) vaccination in children: advantage of the rapid immunization schedule (i.e., days 0, 7, 21). Hum Vaccin 2007; 3:42 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/hv.3.2.3747; PMID: 17297298
  • Rendi-Wagner P, Kundi M, Zent O, Dvorak G, Jaehnig P, Holzmann H, et al. Persistence of protective immunity following vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis--longer than expected?. Vaccine 2004; 22:2743 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.041; PMID: 15246606
  • Prymula R, Pöllabauer EM, Pavlova BG, Löw-Baselli A, Fritsch S, Angermayr R, et al. Antibody persistence after two vaccinations with either FSME-IMMUN® Junior or ENCEPUR® Children followed by third vaccination with FSME-IMMUN® Junior. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2012; 8:736 - 42; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/hv.20058; PMID: 22699436
  • Lehrer AT, Holbrook MR. Tick-Borne Encephalitis. In: Barrett AT and Stanberry LR, eds. Vaccines for biodefense and emerging and neglected diseases. First edition. London: Academic Press Inc, 2009:726.
  • Ecker M, Allison SL, Meixner T, Heinz FX. Sequence analysis and genetic classification of tick-borne encephalitis viruses from Europe and Asia. J Gen Virol 1999; 80:179 - 85; PMID: 9934700
  • Leonova GN, Ternovoi VA, Pavlenko EV, Maistrovskaya OS, Protopopova EV, Loktev VB. Evaluation of vaccine Encepur Adult for induction of human neutralizing antibodies against recent Far Eastern subtype strains of tick-borne encephalitis virus. Vaccine 2007; 25:895 - 901; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.09.014; PMID: 17011677
  • Barret PN, Plotkin SA, Ehrlich HJ. Tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccines. In: Plotkin S, Orenstein W, Offit P, eds. Vaccines. Fifth edition. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2008:841-856.
  • Holzmann H, Vorobyova MS, Ladyzhenskaya IP, Ferenczi E, Kundi M, Kunz C, et al. Molecular epidemiology of tick-borne encephalitis virus: cross-protection between European and Far Eastern subtypes. Vaccine 1992; 10:345 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0264-410X(92)90376-U; PMID: 1574920
  • Chiba N, Osada M, Komoro K, Mizutani T, Kariwa H, Takashima I. Protection against tick-borne encephalitis virus isolated in Japan by active and passive immunization. Vaccine 1999; 17:1532 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00360-0; PMID: 10195790
  • Fritz R, Orlinger KK, Hofmeister Y, Janecki K, Traweger A, Perez-Burgos L, et al. Quantitative comparison of the cross-protection induced by tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccines based on European and Far Eastern virus subtypes. Vaccine 2012; 30:1165 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.013; PMID: 22178103
  • Hayasaka D, Goto A, Yoshii K, Mizutani T, Kariwa H, Takashima I. Evaluation of European tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccine against recent Siberian and far-eastern subtype strains. Vaccine 2001; 19:4774 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00218-3; PMID: 11535329
  • Leonova GN, Pavlenko EV. Characterization of neutralizing antibodies to Far Eastern of tick-borne encephalitis virus subtype and the antibody avidity for four tick-borne encephalitis vaccines in human. Vaccine 2009; 27:2899 - 904; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.069; PMID: 19366574
  • Orlinger KK, Hofmeister Y, Fritz R, Holzer GW, Falkner FG, Unger B, et al. A tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccine based on the European prototype strain induces broadly reactive cross-neutralizing antibodies in humans. J Infect Dis 2011; 203:1556 - 64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir122; PMID: 21592984
  • Prevention of TBE, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Available at: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/healthtopics/tick_borne_diseases/tick_borne_encephalitis/key_messages/Pages/prevention.aspx. Accessed: January 3, 2013.
  • Heinz FX, Holzmann H, Essl A, Kundi M. Field effectiveness of vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccine 2007; 25:7559 - 67; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.08.024; PMID: 17869389
  • Kunze U. Tick-borne encephalitis: from epidemiology to vaccination recommendations in 2007. New issues--best practices. Wien Med Wochenschr 2007; 157:228 - 32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-007-0424-8; PMID: 17564770
  • Heinz FX, Stiasny K, Holzmann H, Grgic-Vitek M, Kriz B, Essl A, et al. Vaccination and Tick-borne Encephalitis, Central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis 2013; 19:69 - 76; http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1901.120458; PMID: 23259984
  • Šmit R. Cost-effectiveness of tick-borne encephalitis vaccination in Slovenian adults. Vaccine 2012; 30:6301 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.07.083; PMID: 22885012
  • Schwarz B. [Health economics of early summer meningoencephalitis in Austria. Effects of a vaccination campaign 1981 to 1990]. Wien Med Wochenschr 1993; 143:551 - 5; PMID: 8147001
  • Kunze U, ISW TBE. Tick-borne encephalitis: the impact of epidemiology, changing lifestyle, and environmental factors. Conference report of the 12th Annual Meeting of the International Scientific Working Group on Tick-Borne Encephalitis (ISW-TBE). Vaccine 2011; 29:1355 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.048; PMID: 21199705
  • Who Publication. Vaccines against tick-borne encephalitis: WHO position paper--recommendations. Vaccine 2011; 29:8769 - 70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.024; PMID: 21777636