6,525
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Race, ethnicity and income as factors for HPV vaccine acceptance and use

, , &
Pages 1413-1420 | Received 01 Jan 2013, Accepted 23 Mar 2013, Published online: 09 Apr 2013

Abstract

If distributed equitably, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have the potential to reduce racial disparities in HPV-related diseases and cervical cancers. However, current trends in the US indicate low uptake among all adolescents, with persistent disparities among minority and low-income adolescents despite largely positive views of vaccination among their parents. As Black, Hispanic, and Asian populations continue to grow in the US over the next 40 y, it is imperative that we not only improve HPV vaccination rates overall, but focus on high-risk populations to prevent an increase in cervical cancer disparities. This review discusses initiation and completion rates of the three-dose HPV vaccine series among adolescents in high-risk groups and describes cultural similarities and differences in motivation and barriers to vaccination. The goal of this review is to highlight factors leading to vaccination in different adolescent racial groups and to help guide the development of strategies to increase rates of vaccine initiation and completion among groups at the highest risk for developing cervical cancer.

Introduction

Racial disparities in cervical cancer and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination

In the United States, cervical cancer remains the third most common gynecological cancer, with an estimated incidence of approximately 12,000 new cases of invasive disease and 4,000 deaths annually.Citation1 Cervical cancer incidence and mortality are 25% and 95% higher respectively among Blacks and 53% and 41% higher respectively for Latinas compared with Whites.Citation1 Cervical cancer incidence is nearly twice as high in counties with the poverty levels above 20% compared with less than 10%.Citation2 Because minorities in the US are more likely to be poor than Whites, have less access to healthcare, and may receive differential treatment based on insurance status, race, or both, disentangling the effects of race, socioeconomic status, and healthcare access on cervical cancer disparities is challenging.

Chronic HPV infection causes 99.7% of invasive cervical cancers,Citation3 and HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection, with a prevalence of 42.5% in women ages 14–59.Citation4 Low risk HPV, genotypes 6 and 11, account for 90% of benign disease such as genital warts, and genotypes 16 and18 account for approximately 70% of cervical cancers worldwide.Citation5 Since 2006, a quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil® or HPV4) and a bivalent vaccine (Cervarix® or HPV2) have been recommended to protect against HPV infection in women.Citation6,Citation7 Both vaccines can prevent up to 98% of HPV 16- and 18-related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, a precursor to cervical cancer, and the quadrivalent vaccine also prevents vaginal, vulvar and anal dysplasia as well as genital warts.Citation6,Citation7 Routine vaccination is recommended for girls at age 11–12, with catch-up vaccination through age 26. The recommended vaccination age of 11–12 was chosen to minimize the likelihood of HPV exposure prior to vaccination; 6.2% of adolescents nationwide initiate sexual activity prior to age 13.Citation8

Despite these recommendations, however, the overall rate of initiating and completing the HPV vaccine series among US female adolescents are only 53% and 35% respectively,Citation9 even though studies indicate that approximately 70% of parents of all races and income levels intend to vaccinate their daughters.Citation10,Citation11 Unlike the patterns seen for invasive cervical cancer, however, HPV vaccine initiation rates are highest in Black and Hispanic girls and those living below poverty, although disparities remain related to vaccine completion among those who start the series, with the highest rates for White girls living above poverty. This article reviews factors associated with HPV vaccine acceptability, uptake, and completion among adolescents of different racial, ethnic, and income groups in the United States.

HPV vaccination in the Black community

Black women, who represent approximately 14% of US women,Citation12 have the highest rates of HPV infections, making HPV vaccination prior to sexual debut especially important among this group.Citation4,Citation13 The 2011 Youth Risk Behavior report found that more Black teens (60%) reported having sexual intercourse than Hispanic (48.6%) and White (44.3%) teens. Nearly 14% of African-Americans had their first sexual experience prior to age 13, compared with 7.1% for Hispanics and 3.9% for Whites.Citation8 In addition, 24.8% of Black teens reported four or more lifetime partners, compared with 14.8% of Hispanics and 13.1% of Whites.Citation8

Black mothers have been shown to have an overall positive view on vaccination after education about HPV, citing a desire to prevent cancer and protect their children against a sexually transmitted infection.Citation8,Citation14,Citation15 Concerns described by African-American parents include a lack of information on vaccine efficacy and safety, cost, long-term side effects, the belief that vaccination may increase early or unsafe sexual behavior, and concern that the new vaccines are experimental ().Citation16,Citation17 Studies of vaccination rates shortly after the vaccine was released indicated lower rates among Black compared with White girls. Among 9–20 y-old female Medicaid patients surveyed in 2008, Black girls had the lowest rates of vaccination among (5.1%), compared with 7.2% of Whites and 9.5% of Hispanics.Citation18 While the effects of race are often difficult to distinguish from those of income and insurance status, a larger study involving middle class adolescents enrolled in a managed care organization also found a lower rate of HPV vaccine uptake among Black compared with Whites teens in the 18 mo following vaccine approval.Citation19 The most recent national data, however, indicates that disparities in vaccine initiation may be improving. The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) found no difference in vaccine initiation between 11–17 y-old Black and White teens,Citation20 and the National Immunization Survey- Teen (NIS-teen)Citation9 reported that 56% of non-Hispanic Black teens initiated in 2011 compared with 47.5% for non-Hispanic White teens ().

Table 1. Barriers and facilitators of HPV vaccination among minority groups

Table 2. Relationship of race, ethnicity, and poverty to cervical cancer incidence and mortality, and HPV vaccine initiation and completion

While initiation is important, completion of all three doses of the HPV vaccine is recommended given the lack of data showing efficacy of incomplete vaccination.Citation21-Citation23 Many studies have found lower adherence to the recommended vaccination schedule among Black females than other races, with Blacks being half as likely to complete vaccination as their White counterparts in two studies of publically insured patients.Citation18,Citation24 From 2006–2009, complete vaccination rates among Black teens ranged from 11.1–24.6% compared with 19.5–65.3% among Whites.Citation9,Citation19,Citation24,Citation25 NIS-Teen 2011 reported a dramatic increase in completion rates across most races compared with prior years, however Blacks who begin the HPV vaccine series continue to have a lower completion rate than Whites: 60.8% (95% CI 54.1–67.5) vs. 74.8% (95% CI 72.3–77.3).Citation9

HPV vaccination among sub-populations of Black women

Much research on Black women fails to account for the heterogeneity of beliefs and attitudes among subgroups of this population, particularly with respect to immigrants from the Caribbean. One survey showed a slightly higher rate of sexual activity in Caribbean-American than African-Americans teens (56% vs. 46% by age 16), and also more interest in vaccination (54% for Caribbean-American vs. 35% for African-American, p = 0.016).Citation26 Research with parents of Caribbean American teens indicates mixed views about vaccination, however, with reported support for vaccination ranging from 30–70%.Citation27-Citation29 Barriers to HPV vaccination may be especially prevalent in the Haitian community (). Many Haitian women have very little knowledge and hold various misconceptions about HPV including beliefs that transmission may depend on sexual position, that physical sequelae are often manifested with initial infection, and beliefs related to confusion between HPV and HIV, such as HPV causing AIDS, and concerns that the vaccine was intended for Haitians as an experiment, or would be used as a tool for discrimination against the Haitian community.Citation28,Citation29 Another study of Haitian parents indicated that some did not feel that HPV vaccination fell within their parental role as their children should not become sexually active before adulthood.Citation27 Other parents believed that their daughters were too young for vaccination, that their children were not sexually active (and that sex at a young age is an “American” trait), that the vaccine may be misinterpreted as permission to engage in sexual activity, that the vaccine was only necessary for women with multiple partners, and that vaccination was not necessary for people who practiced abstinence.Citation30 Studies looking at the initiation and completion rates among other Black subgroups, especially among immigrants from African countries, are lacking.

HPV vaccination in the Hispanic/Latino community

Hispanic females, who represent approximately 17% of US women,Citation12 have the second highest prevalence of HPV infection (44.2%).Citation4 Similar to Black women, most (58–90%) Hispanic women surveyed stated that they would accept HPV vaccination.Citation16,Citation17,Citation31-Citation33 Women with HPV infections were more likely to accept vaccination, to favor a law recommending vaccination for girls prior to entry in the sixth grade, and to know where to bring their children to be vaccinated.Citation32 Those who believed vaccines in general were safe, who trusted their providers, and who also believed that the HPV vaccine could help prevent cervical cancer were also more likely to vaccinate their daughters.Citation16,Citation33 Most Hispanic parents who expressed reservations or declined vaccination for their daughters stated that they needed more information, were concerned about vaccine safety, or did not know where to obtain vaccination.Citation17,Citation33,Citation34 Few parents believed that the vaccine would be misinterpreted as permission to engaged in intercourse at a young age ().Citation16,Citation33

The NIS-Teen surveys in 2008, 2009, and 2011 and the NHIS 2010 all found higher HPV vaccine initiation rates among Hispanic girls than White teens.Citation20,Citation35-Citation38 In 2011, 65% of Hispanic adolescents received one or more doses of the vaccine compared with 47.5% of White and 56% of Black adolescentsCitation9 (). Among Hispanic adolescents who begin the series, 69.4% (95% CI 63.9–74.9) complete three shots compared with 74.8% (95% CI 72.3–77.3) for Whites.Citation9 High acceptance of HPV vaccination among Hispanics may be due, in part, to favorable views toward vaccines in general, due to personal experience with vaccine-preventable diseases in their home countries.Citation16 In addition, cervical cancer is the leading cause of death for women in many parts of Latin America,Citation39 and up to 30% of Hispanic women know someone who has suffered with this disease.Citation16,Citation40 Differences based on country of origin have been documented for other cancer prevention measures,Citation41 and research comparing HPV knowledge in the Southeastern US found that fewer immigrants from Mexico and Honduras had heard of HPV and HPV vaccination than immigrants from Puerto Rico, though all were equally likely to favor HPV vaccination.Citation42 Similarly, Mexican-Americans in Los Angeles were equally likely to vaccinate their daughters compared with Hispanics from other countries.Citation33

HPV and vaccination in Asian/Pacific Islander communities

The term Asian/Pacific Islander refers to people from East Asia, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands, and represents approximately 5% of the US population.Citation12 Although cervical cancer incidence for Asians overall is lower than other ethnic groups (6.7 per 100,000 for Asians compared with 9 per 100,000 for Blacks, 10 per 100,000 for Hispanics, and 7 per 100,000 for non-Hispanic Whites),Citation1 certain subgroups have extremely high rates, specifically Vietnamese-American women (14 per 100,000 women) and Korean-American women (11 per 100,000).Citation43 Asian/Pacific Islander is a highly diverse group and limited data are available examining HPV vaccination.

Surveys examining parents’ intention to vaccinate have shown lower rates among Asians than other ethnic groups,Citation34,Citation44,Citation45 perhaps due to language barriers, limited knowledge, and concerns related to promoting sexual activity.Citation34,Citation45-Citation48 Different perceptions of the effect of HPV vaccination on sexual activity were noted between Mandarin- and Cantonese-speaking Chinese immigrants,Citation45 and Cambodian American parents suggested that traditional values related to sexuality contribute to hesitation in vaccinating their children ().Citation49 Nationwide data are conflicting regarding education rates for Asians. NIS-teen 2011 data indicate similar rates of vaccine initiation and completion among Asian and White teens (initiation: 55.8, 95% CI 45.0–66.6 for Asians vs. 47.5 95% CI 45.6–49.4 for Whites; completion among those who start: 70.5 95% CI 55.3–85.7 for Asians vs. 74.8 95% CI 72.3–77.3).Citation9 NHIS 2010 data, however, shows that Asians overall are less likely than all other minority groups sampled to initiate vaccination series (OR 0.65 vs. 0.68 for Hispanic and 0.75 for Black).Citation50

Poverty status, education and HPV vaccination

Approximately 15% of the American population lives below poverty, with higher proportion of Blacks (27.6%, 90% CI 25.6–28.6%) and Hispanics (25.3%, 90% CI 24.5–26.1) living below poverty than Asians (12.3%, 90% CI 11.1–13.5) and Whites (9.8%, 90% CI 9.5–10.1).Citation51 In comparison to women at or above poverty level, those below poverty level have a higher prevalence of HPV infections at 56.5% vs. 39.7%,Citation4 are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cervical cancer, and are 30% less likely to survive after a diagnosis of distant-stage disease.Citation52 Some studies suggest that a large percentage of low income mothers have overall positive views if HPV vaccinationsCitation10,Citation16 and are very likely to accept vaccinations for their daughters. In fact, several studies have shown that parents with a high school education or less were more willing to vaccinate their daughters than those with college degrees.Citation44,Citation53,Citation54 Differences may be more pronounced for girls age 13 or younger: one study found that 87% of parents with a high school education or less would vaccinate compared with 66% of college-educated parents (p = 0.005),Citation44 though another showed that parental education level had no effect.Citation46 Reasons for supporting vaccination included concerns for health, safety, and to avoid future feelings of regret in the event of an adverse outcome.Citation16,Citation44 Consistent with high levels of support for HPV vaccination among low-income parents, the NIS-teen 2011Citation9 reported higher levels of vaccine initiation among females below than those above the poverty level (62.1% 95% CI 58.4–65.8% vs. 50.1% 95% CI 48.1–51.9) (). Among those who start the series, however, a trend toward lower completion rates is noted among poor teens compared with those above the poverty level (66.4% 95% CI 61.2–70.8 vs. 72.6 95% CI 70.0–75.2). Reported barriers to vaccination include lack of information and lack of urgency to vaccinate,Citation53 moral concerns for their daughter’s sexuality, and concern for safety.Citation44

Discussion

In the United States approximately 12,000 cases of cervical cancer occur each year. As with many other types of cancer,Citation55 higher incidence and mortality rates are seen in low-income minority populations.Citation1 Some of these observed differences are due to higher rates of HPV exposure, which are culturally and socially mediated and relate to both the age of sexual debut and the number of lifetime partners.Citation8,Citation56 Other factors relate to healthcare access and utilization, and reflect both linguistic and cultural barriers including low health literacy and fatalistic beliefs,Citation57-Citation59 as well as systems-related inequities, with limited access to health care for those who are uninsured or underinsured, leading to differential access to screening, follow-up and treatment for abnormal pap smears, cervical dysplasia, and cancerCitation37,Citation60-Citation62. HPV vaccination has the potential to reduce the impact of a number of these factors by limiting exposure to the virus among sexually active young adults, thus decreasing the risk of cervical dysplasia and cancer among vaccinated women, even if access to screening and treatment remains inequitable. Achieving equivalent or higher rates of HPV vaccination among low-income and minority adolescents compared with affluent and White adolescents is important for two reasons. First, most young adults tend to have sexual partners from within their communities,Citation63 thus the achievement of herd immunity for a sexual network may depend on achieving high vaccination rates along racial, ethnic, and income groups, as well as by geographic area. Second, the proportions of the US population that are Black, Hispanic, and Asian are increasing rapidly. The U.S Census Bureau projects that by 2050, Hispanics will comprise 26.9% of the female population, Black non-Hispanics will comprise 15.6%, and Asians 9.3%, increases which could substantially increase the national burden cervical cancer unless steps are taken to reduce disparities.Citation64

The United States has much lower HPV vaccination rates than other high-income countries. England, Australia, Portugal, Spain, and Scotland, which have national healthcare systems and vaccinate girls in school,Citation65 have all achieved as high as 80% three-dose coverage.Citation66 Canada, which also has a national healthcare system, has vaccinated 58–85% of teen girls, with the highest coverage in provinces using school-based systems, and lowest rates in provinces relying on clinic visits for vaccination.Citation66 The United States healthcare system is insurance-based, with 59% of insurance for children coming from employer-based, private insurance companies, and 36% from public sources.Citation67-Citation69 The remaining 9%Citation1 of children are uninsured, but have access to vaccines, including HPV vaccines, through the federal Vaccines for Children program,Citation12,Citation70 a federal program created in 1993 to cover all vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for uninsured children and adolescents as well as those enrolled in Medicare, Native American, Alaskan Native and those who receive care at rural health centers.Citation12,Citation70 While this program covers vaccines, however, it does not provide coverage for routine medical care that would allow patients to establish a relationship with a primary care provider. The Affordable Care ActCitation71 was designed to help make prevention affordable and accessible for all Americans by requiring both public and private health insurance plans to cover preventive services and by eliminating cost sharing, which includes immunizations, and will also expand Medicaid in most states, effectively increasing the number of low-income children with a regular source of care.

HPV vaccination rates for all girls in the United States are well below the rates needed to achieve herd immunity, and though current trends indicate that low-income and minority adolescents in the US have higher rates of initiating HPV vaccination than White and affluent adolescents,Citation9 minority and low-income girls who start the series are not as likely to complete all three doses as White and affluent girls, and little is known about the effects of incomplete vaccination.Citation21-Citation23 Unlike the United States, other high-income countries with high rates of HPV vaccination indicate lower uptake of HPV vaccination among ethnic minority groups and poor students,Citation72-Citation74 as well as lower rates among some racial and religious groups, specifically Asians (OR = 0.38, CI: 0.15–0.95), Muslims (OR = 0.19, CI: 0.06–0.59) or practicing Sikhs/Hindus (OR = 0.12, CI: 0.03–0.45) in the UK and lower uptake in areas of the Netherlands with higher proportions of voters for Religious Political Parties in the Netherlands.Citation74,Citation75

Because neither school mandates nor school-based vaccination programs are in place on a national scale in the US, vaccination is largely dependent on individual communication between parents of adolescents and their providers, and thus is based on human interactions between parents, adolescents, and providers, which may be influenced by factors related to race, insurance status, and healthcare access. Over 84% of parents of all races and ethnicities use their doctor as their main source of vaccine information,Citation65 most parents (55–90%) say they would accept HPV vaccination if offered by their provider,Citation16,Citation44,Citation76-Citation79 and recommendations of a health care provider are often more important than race or socioeconomic status in determining vaccine receiptCitation78,Citation80-Citation85 Ninety percent of teens that received one or more doses of the HPV vaccine received strong recommendation from a provider,Citation20 a telephone survey of primarily low-income Black and Hispanic families in Los Angeles found that provider recommendation increased the odds of vaccination 48-fold,Citation78 and lack of recommendation from a health care professional was the most frequently reported reasoning for not receiving the HPV vaccination among women found to have precancerous cervical lesions.Citation86

Provider factors associated with offering HPV vaccination include prevention of cervical cancer and HPV-related disease,Citation87 knowledge aboutCitation88 or experience with these diseases,Citation89 and recommendations of professional societies.Citation90,Citation91 Provider-described barriers include reimbursement concerns,Citation87,Citation89,Citation92 parental concerns which result in delayed or missed vaccinations,Citation87,Citation93 concerns that patients would not return for follow-up injections,Citation92 the complex and time-consuming nature of discussing vaccination against sexually transmitted infections,Citation94 and poor public understanding of HPV.Citation95 Physicians as well and other health care providers also have poor understanding of the multiple diseases caused by HPV: while nearly all know that HPV causes cervical cancer, few are aware of the relationship with vulvar, vaginal, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers.Citation96,Citation97 Several surveys demonstrate providers’ reluctance to vaccinate 11–12 y olds compared with older teens.Citation5,Citation98,Citation99 Similarly, studies indicate that providers who defer vaccination for their own children are less likely to recommend it to their patients.Citation100,Citation101 As practitioner recommendation is crucial to vaccine uptake, and each provider interacts with hundreds to thousands of patients, interventions targeting providers such as academic detailingCitation102,Citation103 or performance improvement continuing medical educationCitation104 may be an effective way to improve vaccination rates.

Given that only 35% of teens nationwide have completed HPV vaccination, increasing parents’ awareness of HPV may also help improve vaccination rates since parental permission is required for vaccination of girls under age 18. Minority, immigrant, and non-English-speaking parents consistently demonstrate lower rates of HPV-related knowledge than White and English-speaking parents.Citation105-Citation107 While poor knowledge is not necessarily associated with declining vaccination,Citation108 parents with little knowledge of the benefits of vaccination may be less likely to advocate for themselves. Inadequate knowledge may also contribute to lower rates of completion among minority adolescents. The most common reason given by parents for non-completion was being unaware of the need for subsequent doses; other reasons included side effects, being too busy, and finding the times and locations of the clinics inconvenient.Citation109 These issues may be more common among low-income and minority women who may have limited English proficiency, low health literacy, hold unskilled jobs with inflexible work hours, or have limited childcare options. Factors that would facilitate minority parents’ decisions to vaccinate their children: improved education, affordability, and knowing others who were vaccinated.Citation17 Other predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability include perceived benefits of vaccination, provider recommendation, personal experience with HPV infection or cervical disease, and perceived susceptibility to HPV disease.Citation110,Citation111 Patient-oriented solutions such as patient navigation systems have demonstrated efficacy for improving follow-up after abnormal Pap tests and mammograms among minority and low-income populations,Citation112,Citation113 and could perhaps also be applied to improve completion among those who have started the series.

Strengths and limitations

This review aims to describe HPV vaccine uptake among girls of different racial, ethnic, and income groups in the United States. Because the HPV vaccination rates among different groups change annually, and vary by geographic region, we have used the 2011 National Immunization Survey data to represent the most recent and accurate vaccination data. To explore factors unique to different racial and ethnic groups, we have included both surveys and qualitative studies. All studies will reflect the geographic area and time period when data were collected, which may limit their generalizability. Garinci and colleagues review of studies assessing HPV vaccine uptake found both selection and information biases in available surveys.Citation114 In addition, this review focuses on HPV vaccination in females in the United States; vaccination of males, detailed comparison of vaccination systems (provider-based, school based, compulsory) in high-income countries, and introduction of the HPV vaccine in low-income countries are not addressed.

Conclusions

Overall rates of HPV vaccination in the US are low for all racial, ethnic and socioeconomic groups in the United States. Improvement of HPV vaccination rates will require an integrative effort that may include increased access to care, improved efficacy of provider recommendation, patient education, and system-based changes to facilitate series completion. As access to healthcare is expanded for low-income Americans, health care providers serving these communities should receive support and education regarding successful tools for integrating HPV vaccination into their practices.Citation110 Patient-targeted interventions should focus on the importance of series completion among low-income and minority teens. With an integrated initiative focused on HPV awareness, widespread vaccination should be achievable across all races and demographics. Understanding the current trends as well as the barriers to vaccination will allow for the development of effective strategies to increase rates of vaccination and completion which can alter the future disparities in cervical cancer.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Funding

American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar Grant (MRSG-09–151–01).

References

  • SEER. http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html - incidence-mortality. Accessed 10/7/11 2011.
  • CDC. HPV-Associated Cancers and Poverty Levels. http://wwwcdcgov/cancer/hpv/statistics/povertyhtm 2009;Accessed Feb 27, 2012.
  • Clifford G, Franceschi S, Diaz M, Muñoz N, Villa LL. Chapter 3: HPV type-distribution in women with and without cervical neoplastic diseases. Vaccine 2006; 24:Suppl 3 S3 - , 26-34; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.026; PMID: 16950015
  • Hariri S, Unger ER, Sternberg M, Dunne EF, Swan D, Patel S, et al. Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among females in the United States, the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2006. J Infect Dis 2011; 204:566 - 73; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir341; PMID: 21791659
  • Kahn JA, Cooper HP, Vadaparampil ST, Pence BC, Weinberg AD, LoCoco SJ, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations and agreement with mandated human papillomavirus vaccination for 11-to-12-year-old girls: a statewide survey of Texas physicians. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18:2325 - 32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0184; PMID: 19661092
  • ACIP. Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Comitte on Immunization Practices. MMWR Recomm Rep 2007; 56:1
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). FDA licensure of bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV2, Cervarix) for use in females and updated HPV vaccination recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010; 59:626 - 9; PMID: 20508593
  • Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Flint KH, Hawkins J, et al, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ 2012; 61:1 - 162; PMID: 22673000
  • Opel DJ, Robinson JD, Heritage J, Korfiatis C, Taylor JA, Mangione-Smith R. Characterizing providers’ immunization communication practices during health supervision visits with vaccine-hesitant parents: a pilot study. Vaccine 2012; 30:1269 - 75; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.129; PMID: 22230593
  • Gainforth HL, Cao W, Latimer-Cheung AE. Message framing and parents’ intentions to have their children vaccinated against HPV. Public Health Nurs 2012; 29:542 - 52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2012.01038.x; PMID: 23078425
  • Roche KC, Wiechens N, Owen-Hughes T, Perkins ND. The FHA domain protein SNIP1 is a regulator of the cell cycle and cyclin D1 expression. Oncogene 2004; 23:8185 - 95; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208025; PMID: 15378006
  • CDC. Vaccines for Children Program. 2012.
  • Dunne EF, Unger ER, Sternberg M, McQuillan G, Swan DC, Patel SS, et al. Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States. JAMA 2007; 297:813 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.8.813; PMID: 17327523
  • Olshen E, Woods ER, Austin SB, Luskin M, Bauchner H. Parental acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. J Adolesc Health 2005; 37:248 - 51; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.05.016; PMID: 16109349
  • Brawner BM, Baker JL, Voytek CD, et al. The Development of a Culturally Relevant, Theoretically Driven HPV Prevention Intervention for Urban Adolescent Females and Their Parents/Guardians. Health Promot Pract 2012.
  • Perkins RB, Pierre-Joseph N, Marquez C, Iloka S, Clark JA. Why do low-income minority parents choose human papillomavirus vaccination for their daughters?. J Pediatr 2010; 157:617 - 22; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.04.013; PMID: 20472250
  • Scarinci IC, Garcés-Palacio IC, Partridge EE. An examination of acceptability of HPV vaccination among African American women and Latina immigrants. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2007; 16:1224 - 33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.0175; PMID: 17937576
  • Cook RL, Zhang J, Mullins J, Kauf T, Brumback B, Steingraber H, et al. Factors associated with initiation and completion of human papillomavirus vaccine series among young women enrolled in Medicaid. J Adolesc Health 2010; 47:596 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.015; PMID: 21094437
  • Chao C, Velicer C, Slezak JM, Jacobsen SJ. Correlates for human papillomavirus vaccination of adolescent girls and young women in a managed care organization. Am J Epidemiol 2010; 171:357 - 67; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp365; PMID: 20047978
  • Kester LM, Zimet GD, Fortenberry JD, Kahn JA, Shew ML. A National Study of HPV Vaccination of Adolescent Girls: Rates, Predictors, and Reasons for Non-Vaccination. Matern Child Health J 2012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1066-z; PMID: 22729660
  • Paavonen J, Naud P, Salmerón J, Wheeler CM, Chow SN, Apter D, et al, HPV PATRICIA Study Group. Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet 2009; 374:301 - 14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61248-4; PMID: 19586656
  • Group FIS, FUTURE II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1915 - 27; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061741; PMID: 17494925
  • Goldman A, Schwartz McDonald S. The group depth interview: Principles and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.; 1987.
  • Widdice LE, Bernstein DI, Leonard AC, Marsolo KA, Kahn JA. Adherence to the HPV vaccine dosing intervals and factors associated with completion of 3 doses. Pediatrics 2011; 127:77 - 84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-0812; PMID: 21149425
  • Niccolai LM, Mehta NR, Hadler JL. Racial/Ethnic and poverty disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination completion. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41:428 - 33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.032; PMID: 21961471
  • Read DS, Joseph MA, Polishchuk V, Suss AL. Attitudes and perceptions of the HPV vaccine in Caribbean and African-American adolescent girls and their parents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2010; 23:242 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2010.02.002; PMID: 20452260
  • Poole JC, Thain A, Perkins ND, Roninson IB. Induction of transcription by p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1: role of NFkappaB and effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cell Cycle 2004; 3:931 - 40; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.3.7.971; PMID: 15190207
  • Kobetz E, Menard J, Hazan G, Koru-Sengul T, Joseph T, Nissan J, et al. Perceptions of HPV and cervical cancer among Haitian immigrant women: implications for vaccine acceptability. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2011; 24:479; PMID: 22267344
  • Gust DA, Darling N, Kennedy A, Schwartz B. Parents with doubts about vaccines: which vaccines and reasons why. Pediatrics 2008; 122:718 - 25; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0538; PMID: 18829793
  • Opel DJ, Taylor JA, Mangione-Smith R, Solomon C, Zhao C, Catz S, et al. Validity and reliability of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents. Vaccine 2011; 29:6598 - 605; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.115; PMID: 21763384
  • Podolsky R, Cremer M, Atrio J, Hochman T, Arslan AA. HPV vaccine acceptability by Latino parents: a comparison of U.S. and Salvadoran populations. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2009; 22:205 - 15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2008.05.010; PMID: 19646665
  • Sanderson M, Coker AL, Eggleston KS, Fernandez ME, Arrastia CD, Fadden MK. HPV vaccine acceptance among Latina mothers by HPV status. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009; 18:1793 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.1266; PMID: 19951213
  • Yeganeh N, Curtis D, Kuo A. Factors influencing HPV vaccination status in a Latino population; and parental attitudes towards vaccine mandates. Vaccine 2010; 28:4186 - 91; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.010; PMID: 20417261
  • Bastani R, Glenn BA, Tsui J, Chang LC, Marchand EJ, Taylor VM, et al. Understanding suboptimal human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among ethnic minority girls. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011; 20:1463 - 72; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0267; PMID: 21602307
  • NIS-Teen. Vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13-17 years - United States, 2008 NIS-Teen. Accessed January 12, 2010. http://wwwcdcgov/vaccines/stats-surv/nisteen/tables/08/tab14_HPV1_racexls 2010.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National and state vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13 through 17 years--United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60:1117 - 23; PMID: 21866084
  • Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52:134 - 49; http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.52.3.134; PMID: 12018928
  • Perkins RB, Langrish SM, Stern LJ, Figueroa J, Simon CJ. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?. Trop Med Int Health 2007; 12:1018 - 25; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01888.x; PMID: 17875013
  • Denny L. The prevention of cervical cancer in developing countries. BJOG 2005; 112:1204 - 12; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00713.x; PMID: 16101597
  • Perkins RB, Langrish SM, Cotton DJ, Simon CJ. Maternal support for human papillomavirus vaccination in Honduras. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011; 20:85 - 90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1919; PMID: 21091226
  • Prislin R, Nader PR, De Guire M, Hoy PL, Pung MA, Ross S, et al. Physicians’ immunization knowledge, attitudes, and practices: a valid and internally consistent measurement tool. Am J Prev Med 1999; 17:151 - 2; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(99)00054-9; PMID: 10490060
  • Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Tallia AF, Cohen DJ, DiCicco-Bloom B, McIlvain HE, et al. Delivery of clinical preventive services in family medicine offices. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3:430 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.345; PMID: 16189059
  • McCracken M, Olsen M, Chen MS Jr., Jemal A, Thun M, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer incidence, mortality, and associated risk factors among Asian Americans of Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese ethnicities. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57:190 - 205; http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.57.4.190; PMID: 17626117
  • Constantine NA, Jerman P. Acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccination among Californian parents of daughters: a representative statewide analysis. J Adolesc Health 2007; 40:108 - 15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.007; PMID: 17259050
  • Jaén CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract 1994; 38:166 - 71; PMID: 8308509
  • Miller WRRS. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
  • The Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare. 2012. (Accessed January 17, 2013, at http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/keyissues/issue.aspx?con=2939.)
  • Eppes C, Wu A, Cameron KA, Garcia P, Grobman W. Does obstetrician knowledge regarding influenza increase HINI vaccine acceptance among their pregnant patients?. Vaccine 2012; 30:5782 - 4; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.032; PMID: 22743135
  • Do H, Seng P, Talbot J, Acorda E, Coronado GD, Taylor VM. HPV vaccine knowledge and beliefs among Cambodian American parents and community leaders. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2009; 10:339 - 44; PMID: 19640169
  • Salmon DA, Sotir MJ, Pan WK, Berg JL, Omer SB, Stokley S, et al. Parental vaccine refusal in Wisconsin: a case-control study. WMJ 2009; 108:17 - 23; PMID: 19326630
  • Leddy MA, Anderson BL, Power ML, Gall S, Gonik B, Schulkin J. Changes in and current status of obstetrician-gynecologists’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding immunization. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009; 64:823 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181c4bbb7; PMID: 19939296
  • Perkins RB, Hall JE, Martin KA. Neuroendocrine abnormalities in hypothalamic amenorrhea: spectrum, stability, and response to neurotransmitter modulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84:1905 - 11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.84.6.1905; PMID: 10372685
  • Rosenthal SL, Rupp R, Zimet GD, Meza HM, Loza ML, Short MB, et al. Uptake of HPV vaccine: demographics, sexual history and values, parenting style, and vaccine attitudes. J Adolesc Health 2008; 43:239 - 45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.06.009; PMID: 18710678
  • Zimet GD, Mays RM, Sturm LA, Ravert AA, Perkins SM, Juliar BE. Parental attitudes about sexually transmitted infection vaccination for their adolescent children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159:132 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.2.132; PMID: 15699306
  • Halperin S. How to manage parents unsure about immunization. Can J Contin Med Educ 2000; 12:62 - 74
  • Akers AY, Newmann SJ, Smith JS. Factors underlying disparities in cervical cancer incidence, screening, and treatment in the United States. Curr Probl Cancer 2007; 31:157 - 81; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2007.01.001; PMID: 17543946
  • Lee MC. Knowledge, barriers, and motivators related to cervical cancer screening among Korean-American women. A focus group approach. Cancer Nurs 2000; 23:168 - 75; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200006000-00003; PMID: 10851767
  • Powe BD, Finnie R. Cancer fatalism: the state of the science. Cancer Nurs 2003; 26:454 - 65, quiz 466-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200312000-00005; PMID: 15022977
  • Vanslyke JG, Baum J, Plaza V, Otero M, Wheeler C, Helitzer DL. HPV and cervical cancer testing and prevention: knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes among Hispanic women. Qual Health Res 2008; 18:584 - 96; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732308315734; PMID: 18337618
  • Garbers S, Chiasson MA. Inadequate functional health literacy in Spanish as a barrier to cervical cancer screening among immigrant Latinas in New York City. Prev Chronic Dis 2004; 1:A07; PMID: 15670438
  • Downs LS, Smith JS, Scarinci I, Flowers L, Parham G. The disparity of cervical cancer in diverse populations. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109:Suppl S22 - 30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.003; PMID: 18482555
  • Brooks SE, Chen TT, Ghosh A, Mullins CD, Gardner JF, Baquet CR. Cervical cancer outcomes analysis: impact of age, race, and comorbid illness on hospitalizations for invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 79:107 - 15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.5901; PMID: 11006041
  • Grieb SM, Davey-Rothwell M, Latkin CA. Social and sexual network characteristics and concurrent sexual partnerships among urban African American high-risk women with main sex partners. AIDS Behav 2012; 16:882 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0030-z; PMID: 21861193
  • Population Projections. 2012. (Accessed December 1, 2012, at http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2012/summarytables.html.)
  • Kimmel S. Adolescent Vaccination: Physician Challenges and Solutions. J Adolesc Health 2010; 46:S16 - 23; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.11.219
  • Cohen NJ, Lauderdale DS, Shete PB, Seal JB, Daum RS. Physician knowledge of catch-up regimens and contraindications for childhood immunizations. Pediatrics 2003; 111:925 - 32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.111.5.925; PMID: 12728067
  • Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?. JAMA 1999; 282:867 - 74; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.9.867; PMID: 10478694
  • Performance improvement CME: Core of the new CME. 2007. (Accessed January 19, 2013, at http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/cme/cppd22.pdf.)
  • Mazmanian PE, Davis DA. Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence. JAMA 2002; 288:1057 - 60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.9.1057; PMID: 12204068
  • Dempsey AF, Davis MM. Overcoming barriers to adherence to HPV vaccination recommendations. Am J Manag Care 2006; 12:Suppl S484 - 91; PMID: 17203992
  • Moyer JH, Perkins RB. Experimental studies on the toxicity of amithiozone in dogs. Am Rev Tuberc 1951; 64:659 - 68; PMID: 14885696
  • Flanagan-Klygis EA, Sharp L, Frader JE. Dismissing the family who refuses vaccines: a study of pediatrician attitudes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005; 159:929 - 34; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.10.929; PMID: 16203937
  • Healy CM, Pickering LK. How to communicate with vaccine-hesitant parents. Pediatrics 2011; 127:Suppl 1 S127 - 33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1722S; PMID: 21502238
  • Jones TB, Bailey BA, Sokol RJ. Alcohol Use in Pregnancy: Insights in Screening and Intervention for the Clinician Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013.
  • Klimas J, Field CA, Cullen W, O’Gorman CS, Glynn LG, Keenan E, et al. Psychosocial interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in concurrent problem alcohol and illicit drug users: Cochrane Reviewa. Syst Rev 2013; 2:3; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-3; PMID: 23311684
  • Brewer NT, Fazekas KI. Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: a theory-informed, systematic review. Prev Med 2007; 45:107 - 14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.013; PMID: 17628649
  • Conroy K, Rosenthal SL, Zimet GD, Jin Y, Bernstein DI, Glynn S, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine uptake, predictors of vaccination, and self-reported barriers to vaccination. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009; 18:1679 - 86; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2008.1329; PMID: 19785564
  • Guerry SL, De Rosa CJ, Markowitz LE, Walker S, Liddon N, Kerndt PR, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine initiation among adolescent girls in high-risk communities. Vaccine 2011; 29:2235 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.052; PMID: 21288799
  • Perkins RB, Apte G, Marquez C, Porter C, Belizaire M, Clark JA, et al. Factors affecting human papillomavirus vaccine use among White, Black and Latino parents of sons. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013; 32:e38 - 44; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e31826f53e3; PMID: 22914585
  • Bartlett JA, Peterson JA. The uptake of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine among adolescent females in the United States: a review of the literature. J Sch Nurs 2011; 27:434 - 46; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059840511415861; PMID: 21750234
  • Dorell CG, Yankey D, Santibanez TA, Markowitz LE. Human papillomavirus vaccination series initiation and completion, 2008-2009. Pediatrics 2011; 128:830 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0950; PMID: 22007006
  • Litton AG, Desmond RA, Gilliland J, Huh WK, Franklin FA. Factors associated with intention to vaccinate a daughter against HPV: a statewide survey in Alabama. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2011; 24:166 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2011.01.004; PMID: 21397534
  • Dorell C, Yankey D, Strasser S. Parent-reported reasons for nonreceipt of recommended adolescent vaccinations, national immunization survey: teen, 2009. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2011; 50:1116 - 24; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009922811415104; PMID: 21856964
  • Lau M, Lin H, Flores G. Factors associated with human papillomavirus vaccine-series initiation and healthcare provider recommendation in US adolescent females: 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health. Vaccine 2012; 30:3112 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.034; PMID: 22425179
  • Rosenthal SL, Weiss TW, Zimet GD, Ma L, Good MB, Vichnin MD. Predictors of HPV vaccine uptake among women aged 19-26: importance of a physician’s recommendation. Vaccine 2011; 29:890 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.063; PMID: 20056186
  • Mehta NR, Julian PJ, Meek JI, Sosa LE, Bilinski A, Hariri S, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination history among women with precancerous cervical lesions: disparities and barriers. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119:575 - 81; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182460d9f; PMID: 22353956
  • Kahn JA, Rosenthal SL, Tissot AM, Bernstein DI, Wetzel C, Zimet GD. Factors influencing pediatricians’ intention to recommend human papillomavirus vaccines. Ambul Pediatr 2007; 7:367 - 73; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ambp.2007.05.010; PMID: 17870645
  • Schnatz PF, Humphrey K, O’Sullivan DM. Assessment of the perceptions and administration of the human papillomavirus vaccine. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2010; 14:103 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181b240ca; PMID: 20354417
  • Young JL, Bernheim RG, Korte JE, Stoler MH, Guterbock TM, Rice LW. Human papillomavirus vaccination recommendation may be linked to reimbursement: a survey of Virginia family practitioners and gynecologists. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2011; 24:380 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2011.06.016; PMID: 21906978
  • Askelson NM, Campo S, Lowe JB, Dennis LK, Smith S, Andsager J. Factors related to physicians’ willingness to vaccinate girls against HPV: the importance of subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. Women Health 2010; 50:144 - 58; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03630241003705094; PMID: 20437302
  • Jensen ME, Hartenbach E, McElroy JA, Faerber A, Havighurst T, Kim KM, et al. Brief report: Measuring the attitudes of health care professionals in Dane County toward adolescent immunization with HPV vaccine. WMJ 2009; 108:203 - 5; PMID: 19753828
  • Tariq S, Bhakta S, Grimes A, Stevens A. Attitudes of Arkansas’ primary care physicians toward the HPV vaccine. J Ark Med Soc 2009; 106:113 - 7; PMID: 19899297
  • Smith MJ, Woods CR, Marshall GS. Parental vaccine concerns in Kentucky. J Ky Med Assoc 2009; 107:342 - 9; PMID: 19813430
  • Sussman AL, Helitzer D, Sanders M, Urquieta B, Salvador M, Ndiaye K. HPV and cervical cancer prevention counseling with younger adolescents: implications for primary care. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5:298 - 304; http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.723; PMID: 17664495
  • Tissot AM, Zimet GD, Rosenthal SL, Bernstein DI, Wetzel C, Kahn JA. Effective strategies for HPV vaccine delivery: the views of pediatricians. J Adolesc Health 2007; 41:119 - 25; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.05.007; PMID: 17659214
  • Saraiya M, Rosser JI, Cooper CP. Cancers that U.S. physicians believe the HPV vaccine prevents: findings from a physician survey, 2009. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012; 21:111 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2011.3313; PMID: 22216920
  • Perkins RB, Clark JA. Providers' Attitudes Toward Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Young Men: Challenges for Implementation of 2011 Recommendations. Am J Mens Health 2012.
  • Vadaparampil ST, Kahn JA, Salmon D, Lee JH, Quinn GP, Roetzheim R, et al. Missed clinical opportunities: provider recommendations for HPV vaccination for 11-12 year old girls are limited. Vaccine 2011; 29:8634 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.006; PMID: 21924315
  • McCave EL. Influential factors in HPV vaccination uptake among providers in four states. J Community Health 2010; 35:645 - 52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-010-9255-4; PMID: 20336354
  • Barnack JL, Reddy DM, Swain C. Predictors of parents’ willingness to vaccinate for human papillomavirus and physicians’ intentions to recommend the vaccine. Womens Health Issues 2010; 20:28 - 34; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2009.08.007; PMID: 20123174
  • Ishibashi KL, Koopmans J, Curlin FA, Alexander KA, Ross LF. Paediatricians’ attitudes and practices towards HPV vaccination. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97:1550 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00958.x; PMID: 18671696
  • Gorin SS, Ashford AR, Lantigua R, Desai M, Troxel A, Gemson D. Implementing academic detailing for breast cancer screening in underserved communities. Implement Sci 2007; 2:43; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-43; PMID: 18086311
  • Sheinfeld Gorin S, Gemson D, Ashford A, Bloch S, Lantigua R, Ahsan H, et al. Cancer education among primary care physicians in an underserved community. Am J Prev Med 2000; 19:53 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00153-7; PMID: 10865164
  • Mullikin EA, Ales MW, Cho J, Nelson TM, Rodrigues SB, Speight M. Sharing collaborative designs of tobacco cessation performance improvement CME projects. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2011; 31:Suppl 1 S37 - 49; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chp.20147; PMID: 22190100
  • Bair RM, Mays RM, Sturm LA, Zimet GD. Acceptability of the human papillomavirus vaccine among Latina mothers. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2008; 21:329 - 34; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2008.02.007; PMID: 19064226
  • Cates JR, Brewer NT, Fazekas KI, Mitchell CE, Smith JS. Racial differences in HPV knowledge, HPV vaccine acceptability, and related beliefs among rural, southern women. J Rural Health 2009; 25:93 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00204.x; PMID: 19166567
  • McRee AL, Reiter PL, Brewer NT. Parents' Internet use for information about HPV vaccine. Vaccine 2012; 30:3757 - 62; PMID: 22172505
  • Dempsey AF, Zimet GD, Davis RL, Koutsky L. Factors that are associated with parental acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccines: a randomized intervention study of written information about HPV. Pediatrics 2006; 117:1486 - 93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1381; PMID: 16651301
  • Kouyoumdjian FG, Bailowitz A. Completion of the human papillomavirus vaccine series in females attending an urban immunization clinic. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2011; 30:718 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e3182121426; PMID: 21343841
  • Hamlish T, Clarke L, Alexander KA. Barriers to HPV immunization for African American adolescent females. Vaccine 2012; 30:6472 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.07.085; PMID: 22910288
  • Suh CA, Saville A, Daley MF, Glazner JE, Barrow J, Stokley S, et al. Effectiveness and net cost of reminder/recall for adolescent immunizations. Pediatrics 2012; 129:e1437 - 45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1714; PMID: 22566415
  • Gorin SS, Ashford AR, Lantigua R, Hossain A, Desai M, Troxel A, et al. Effectiveness of academic detailing on breast cancer screening among primary care physicians in an underserved community. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19:110 - 21; http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.2.110; PMID: 16513899
  • Phillips CE, Rothstein JD, Beaver K, Sherman BJ, Freund KM, Battaglia TA. Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26:123 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1527-2; PMID: 20931294
  • Gowda C, Schaffer SE, Dombkowski KJ, Dempsey AF. Understanding attitudes toward adolescent vaccination and the decision-making dynamic among adolescents, parents and providers. BMC Public Health 2012; 12:509; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-509; PMID: 22768870
  • Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control 2009; 20:417 - 35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9256-0; PMID: 19002764
  • Chu KC, Miller BA, Springfield SA. Measures of racial/ethnic health disparities in cancer mortality rates and the influence of socioeconomic status. J Natl Med Assoc 2007; 99:1092 - 100, 1102-4; PMID: 17987912
  • 2011 NIS-Teen. 2012. (Accessed 12/29, 2012, at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/stats-surv/nisteen/data/tables_2011.htm - race.)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.