1,280
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Facilitators and barriers HPV unvaccinated girls after 5 years of program implementation

, , , , , & show all
Pages 240-244 | Received 04 Jun 2014, Accepted 12 Jun 2014, Published online: 01 Nov 2014

Abstract

Understanding perceptions and characteristics of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinated and non-vaccinated girls can inform communication activities and vaccine delivery strategies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate knowledge and factors associated with HPV unvaccinated girls after five years of vaccination program implementation in Sicily, an Italian region with low vaccination coverage (<50.0%).

A cross-sectional study was conducted through a questionnaire designed to assess knowledge and vaccination status of girls of 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000 birth cohorts. The sample consisted of 350 girls who attended three high schools. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine predictors of vaccine refusal.

The survey sample of girls shows that the 43.1% were HPV unvaccinated. A significant increased risk of being unvaccinated originated from the belief that the vaccine was too new (AdjOR = 21.08, CI95% = 2.57–172.97) and that it may cause cervical cancer (AdjOR = 4.36, CI95% = 1.26–15.07), along with having friends as a source of information on the vaccine (AdjOR = 3.67, CI95% = 1.63–8.25). A significant inverse association was observed between being unvaccinated and having Pediatrician/General practitioner as a source of information on HPV vaccine (AdjOR = 0.40, CI95% = 0.24–0.68).

Many girls lack the fundamental knowledge about the HPV vaccine. The key issue is the promotion and implementation of information programs to raise awareness of girls on the importance of the vaccine.

Introduction

Carcinoma of the cervix is the second highest in the world among cancers in women. The etiological factor of this cancer is a pool of high-risk strains of the human papilloma virus (HPV), which are transmitted through sexual contact. Carcinogenesis is a long lasting process, in which cancer represents the final stage of evolution of a series of at risk lesions progressively higher, which, particularly at the initial stage, may spontaneously regress.Citation1 In Italy there are just over 53,000 women with a diagnosis of cervical cancer, and it is estimated that to experience a death due to cancer of the cervix, it is necessary to follow 1087 women for a lifetime.Citation2 Prevention strategies have made it possible to identify the 8% of this burden in less than two years after diagnosis, 14% between 5 and 10 y and 44% over 20 y.

Vaccination is the most effective method of primary prevention of cervical cancer. In Italy HPV vaccination is offered free of charge and actively to the children in the twelfth year of life from 1997 birth cohort.Citation3 Some Italian regions have extended vaccination active offer to other age groups and they provide subsidized payment for age groups not being active call. Five years after the start of the immunization program against HPV and the dissemination of information campaigns, vaccination coverage for three doses of HPV vaccine appears to be stabilized at around 69%, without showing the expected increase in new invited cohorts. A large variability continues to be evident between regional data. Sicily is one of the regions with the lowest immunization coverage against HPV, as being the immunization coverage for three doses of HPV vaccine in the 1997, 1998, and 1999 birth cohort only 55.3%, 54.3%, and 56.0%, respectively.Citation4

Barriers to vaccine adoption are multi-factorials. Understanding the perceptions and characteristics of vaccination acceptance can inform communication activities and vaccine delivery strategies.Citation5 Previous studies indicate poor knowledge about HPV infection and vaccine in the general population but also in target groups.Citation6,Citation7 Several studies have shown that vaccinated and unvaccinated girls have similar levels of knowledge about HPV and HPV vaccine.Citation8,Citation9 Some studies have evaluated HPV knowledge in young females before that HPV vaccine was introduced. However, it is also important to assess the knowledge of girls after vaccination programs have been implemented, particularly considering that also in vaccinated cohorts of girls, the route of transmission of HPV infection and the link between HPV and cervical cancer are scarcely known.Citation10-Citation12

A few Italian studies on girls under 18 y old explored the characteristics of HPV vaccinated only. One study performed on young women who underwent HPV vaccination in Local Health Units (LHU) and on women who attended University in the same city showed that under-18’s were mostly informed by General Practitioners (22.6%), pediatricians (15.4%) and healthcare workers of LHU (13.3%).Citation13 Another study conducted in northern Italy three years after the beginning of HPV vaccination programs showed that, despite a broad information campaign on HPV related diseases and vaccination, routes of transmission knowledge within the vaccine eligible girls was still limited (74.6%).Citation14 Little is known about the barriers encountered by adolescent girls against the HPV vaccine.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with HPV vaccination refusal in Sicily, south Italy, after five years of vaccination program implementation and dissemination of information campaigns, in order to identify knowledge gaps and possible targets of educational interventions.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted through a questionnaire designed to assess knowledge and vaccination status about HPV of the Sicilian girls of 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000 birth cohorts. The sample consisted of girls who attended three high schools in Palermo area, in which directors and teaching boards gave their consent to the study. This area has a population of 1 243 638 inhabitants and includes a total of 19 606 girls attending high schools in the birth cohorts under investigation.Citation15 Participating high school where selected to be as representative as possible of the different Palermo geographical area relatively to knowledge, attitudes and behaviors toward screening and vaccination against HPV and reliable source of information. The survey was administered in April 2013 and questionnaire was managed by the working group in a single day for each school. The questionnaire was given to students as class work and filled in by all girls present on that day. Prior to administration of the questionnaire the working group explained, the purpose and the method by which the survey was conducted. Students had about ten minutes to complete the questionnaire anonymously, without any specific assistance.

The questionnaire was divided into three main sections: the first was related to demographic characteristics of the girls (i.e., age and number of family members), vaccination status (unvaccinated: no injection received; vaccinated: at least one of three-shots of HPV vaccine series received) and HPV infection knowledge; the second regarded the knowledge on HPV vaccine; the third evaluated girl’s sources of information on HPV vaccine.

Descriptive analysis were used to characterize the study sample and detect differences between unvaccinated and vaccinated girls. For categorical variables, absolute and relative frequencies were computed; continuous variables not normally distributed were represented as median (interquartile range, IQR). Differences between groups of continuous variables with normal distributions were examined using an unpaired T-test; for continuous variables non normally distributed Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test on the equality of medians was applied. The normal distribution was assessed with Shapiro-Wilk test. Categorical variables were compared using XCitation2 test. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI95%) was also calculated. The level of significance chosen for all analyses was 0.05 two-tailed test. Also, bivariable associations between being unvaccinated and the characteristics in analysis were conducted; variables founded to be significantly associated were included in a multivariable model. The goodness of the fit was calculated for each model, and the model with the lowest log-likelihood ratio test was considered as having the best predictive ability. All analyses were weighted to adjust for differential participation and differential non response by using the software Stata/MP 11.2.

Results

A total of 378 girls of birth cohort from 1997 to 2001 participated in the survey. Twenty-eight girls (7.4%) were unsure of their cervical cancer vaccination status and thus were not included in the analysis.

Altogether, the study cohort consisted of 350 adolescents (), most of which (96.3%) knew that HPV was a sexually transmitted infection and that it was associated to cervical cancer (83.4%), while only a few (12.3%) knew that it causes genital warts. About 70% of the girls knew that HPV vaccine alone did not guarantee for safe sex. Only a few girls (5.7%) had obtained their information on the HPV vaccine from the school, while almost half had their mother as a source of information.

Table 1. Demographic characteristics and HPV knowledge in the study cohort

A total of 151 girls (43.1%) reported to be unvaccinated against HPV infection. A lower percentage of unvaccinated compared with vaccinated girls was aware that HPV infection was sexually transmitted (93.4% vs. 98.4%, P = 0.002) and knew that HPV infection was associated to cervical cancer (77.5% vs. 87.9%, P = 0.006). While knowledge of the association of HPV with cervical cancer was similarly in the two groups, a higher rate of unvaccinated girls believed that HPV infection was associated to diseases other than those listed in table, compared with vaccinated girls (18.5% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.003). A lower rate of unvaccinated girls thought that the HPV vaccine was effective, compared with vaccinated girls (21.2% vs. 41.2%, P < 0.001); on the other hand, more unvaccinated girls believed that HPV vaccine caused cervical cancer (6.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.028) and that it was too new (8.6% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001). As far as information on the HPV vaccine was regarded, a lower rate of unvaccinated girls had the Pediatrician/General Practitioner as a source of information, compared with vaccinated girls (21.1% vs. 40.2%, P < 0.001); in contrast, more unvaccinated girls had friends and newspapers/magazines as an informative source of HPV vaccination, compared with those vaccinated (17.2% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001 and 5.9% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.008, respectively).

shows results from multivariable logistic regression analysis, performed by taking into account the variables found to be significant in the bivariable analysis. Factors that were confirmed as significant risk for being unvaccinated against HPV were the belief that HPV vaccine was too new (AdjOR = 21.08, CI95%: 2.57–172.97) and that it may cause cervical cancer (AdjOR = 4.36, CI95%: 1.26–15.07), along with having friends as a source of information on HPV vaccine (AdjOR = 3.67, CI95%: 1.63–8.25). A significant reduction of risk to be unvaccinated was observed when Pediatrician/General Practitioner was the source of information on the vaccine (AdjOR = 0.40, CI95%:0.24–0.68).

Table 2. Multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with vaccine refusal

Discussion

This study was designed to integrate public health data on HPV vaccine status and vaccine acceptance, in girls who had been trained on HPV vaccination and in the age range eligible to the first dose of HPV vaccine.

Altogether, adolescents were found to have a good degree of knowledge on HPV infection, sexual transmission and association to cervical cancer, even though only a few girls knew that the infection frequently causes genital warts. This finding is in accordance with what has been showed in previous studies performed in USA on high school and college age women.Citation8,Citation9

The 56.9% vaccination coverage founded in this study is in line with that reported by the Italian National Health Services in 2013, where 62.1% of adolescents from 1997 to 2000 birth cohorts had received one dose of vaccine.Citation2 The 56.9% rate is far from the national target of at least 95% for HPV vaccination coverage 5 y after the implementation of HPV vaccination. In the light of the good level of knowledge on HPV infection evident in the study group, a likely explanation for 43.1% of the girls being unvaccinated are concerns regarding the vaccine, its effectiveness, safety and acceptability. Indeed, the risk of being unvaccinated was associated to the belief that the vaccine was too new (AdjOR = 21.08) and could cause cervical cancer (AdjOR = 4.36). These reasons for vaccine refusal differ from findings in a previous study, performed in California on adolescent girls, which reported a perceived 7% lack of safety of the vaccine.Citation16 On the other hand, a study on college-aged women found that unvaccinated subjects were less informed on HPV infection compared with those vaccinated (median knowledge score 58.3 vs. 66.7, respectively) and also had more concerns about the vaccine’s safety (median perceived barriers: 0.5 vs. −1.0, respectively).Citation17 These results highlight the importance of providing adequate information on the vaccine's safety and efficacy, with attention also that should be paid that such information is clearly understood.

Another finding from this study was that having friends as a source of information on HPV was associated to an about 4 times increased risk for vaccine refusal. Not surprisingly, as being HPV infection related to sexuality, it has been reported that the confidential aspect induced young girls to treat the topic with their peers, rather than with parents or caregivers.Citation18 Not unexpectedly and as also previously showed, such a behavior can cause a distortion of the information, as being the latter provided by persons not adequately prepared and/or appointed to the task.Citation9 Of note, this finding is an issue also in the light of the fact that, in the present analysis, the school was a source of information only in 5.7% of the total cohort of girls examined. It has been showed that the rate of acceptance of the vaccine is considerably lower (19–71%) in the lack of school-based programs than in the presence of the programs (65–86%).Citation19 Thus, to achieve a higher uptake of the vaccine, it could be offered in the context of school-based voluntary vaccination and information campaigns, as already implemented in other countries.Citation20

In agreement with the previous findings from this analysis, a decreased risk of being unvaccinated was associated to having a Pediatrician/General Practitioner as a source of information on the vaccine (AdjOR = 0.40). Evidence has been provided that high school girls, in their decision-making process on the HPV vaccination, have confidence in the information provided by nurses and physicians.Citation20 Also, when provided with adequate and clear information, most of 14–17 y old girls are capable to make decisions about their own health care as competently as adults.Citation21 Altogether, these findings suggest that programs aimed to increasing vaccination coverage should also involve either Pediatricians or General Practitioner, depending on the age of the target.Citation22,Citation23

A limitation of this study is that information of the vaccine status of the study group was obtained from self-reporting, and this may have introduced some error in estimating of HPV immunization rates. Nevertheless, this potential bias was limited by the exclusion from the survey of the girls who had uncertainty about their vaccination status.

The strengths of the study are mainly two. First, an approach was chosen of a not prepared administration about the questionnaire at school, with a limited time for completion; this allowed to avoid biased responses, as influenced by parents and/or information media (websites, newspapers, books), which would misrepresent the true level of students’ knowledge. Second, by administering the questionnaire during school hours, as a kind of class work, the advantage was that the questionnaires were returned as duly completed by all the girls.

Altogether, the results from this analysis show that the key issue in rising knowledge and awareness of girls on HPV vaccine is the promotion and implementation of adequate and complete information campaigns. Strategic, in that sense, will also be the role played by healthcare professionals (e.g., pediatricians, general practitioners, gynecologists, operators from vaccination centers) in the context of educational campaigns, as well as in “one-on-one” discussions specifically geared toward high school girls. These perspectives should be taken into consideration when achieving a high coverage is the desired effect in vaccinating young girls against sexually transmitted HPV infection.

Abbreviations:
y=

years

AdjOR=

Adjusted odds ratio

CI95%=

95% confidence interval

HPV=

Human papillomavirus

IQR=

Interquartile range

LHU=

Local health units

OR=

Odds ratio

USA=

United States of America

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Annarita Filippi for her contribution in the administration of the questionnaire and Prof Vincenza Capursi and Prof Ornella Giambalvo for their contribution in the execution of the statistical analysis.

Reference

  • Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. GLoBoCaN 2008 v2.0, Cancer incidence and mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. Lyon, France: international agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Accessed May 2, 2014 at: http://globocan.iarc.
  • Associazione italiana dei registri tumori (AIRTUM). The numbers of cancer in Italy. [I numeri del cancro in Italia]. 2013 Accessed May 2, 2014 at: http://www.registri-tumori.it/PDF/AIOM2013/I_numeri_del_cancro_2013.pdf.
  • Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri. Strategy for the active offer of the vaccine against HPV infection in Italy. 2007. Accessed May 25, 2014 at http://www.statoregioni.it/Documenti/DOC_016696_264%20csr.pdf.
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Progress of the vaccination campaign for the HPV vaccine coverage data to 30/06/2013 - Interim Report. 2013. Accessed May 25, 2014 at http://www.epicentro.iss.it/problemi/hpv/pdf/HPV_30-06-2013.pdf.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human Papillomavirus. In Atkinson W, Wolfe S, Hamborsky J, eds. Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. 12th ed, second printing. Washington DC: Public Health Foundation, 2012: 139-149.
  • DasA, MadhwapathiV, DaviesP, BrownG, DearnleyE, SpencerA, WilliamsH. Knowledge and acceptability of the HPV vaccine by school children and their parents in Birmingham. Vaccine2010; 28:1440 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.11.041; PMID: 20005317
  • WalshCD, GeraA, ShahM, SharmaA, PowellJE, WilsonS. Public knowledge and attitudes towards Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination. BMC Public Health2008; 8:368; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-368; PMID: 18947430
  • LichtAS, MurphyJM, HylandAJ, FixBV, HawkLW, MahoneyMC. Is use of the human papillomavirus vaccine among female college students related to human papillomavirus knowledge and risk perception?. Sex Transm Infect2010; 86:74 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sti.2009.037705; PMID: 19841004
  • CaskeyR, LindauST, AlexanderGC. Knowledge and early adoption of the HPV vaccine among girls and young women: results of a national survey. J Adolesc Health2009; 45:453 - 62; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.04.021; PMID: 19837351
  • BrewerNT, FazekasKI. Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: a theory-informed, systematic review. Prev Med2007; 45:107 - 14; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.05.013; PMID: 17628649
  • Cooper RobbinsSC, BernardD, McCafferyK, BrothertonJ, GarlandS, SkinnerSR. “Is cancer contagious?”: Australian adolescent girls and their parents: making the most of limited information about HPV and HPV vaccination. Vaccine2010; 28:3398 - 408; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.078; PMID: 20199758
  • HiltonS, SmithE. “I thought cancer was one of those random things. I didn’t know cancer could be caught...”: adolescent girls’ understandings and experiences of the HPV programme in the UK. Vaccine2011; 29:4409 - 15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.03.101; PMID: 21514348
  • La TorreG, De VitoE, FicarraMG, FirenzeA, GregorioP, BocciaA, HPV Collaborative Group. Is there a lack of information on HPV vaccination given by health professionals to young women?. Vaccine2013; 31:4710 - 3; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.015; PMID: 23962532
  • SopracordevoleF, CigolotF, GardonioV, Di GiuseppeJ, BoselliF, CiavattiniA. Teenagers’ knowledge about HPV infection and HPV vaccination in the first year of the public vaccination programme. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis2012; 31:2319 - 25; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1571-4; PMID: 22382817
  • Istituto nazionale di statistica (ISTAT). Fifteenth general census of population and housing. [15° censimento generale delle popolazioni e delle abitazioni]. 2011. Accessed May 2, 2014 at: http://www.istat.it/it/files/2013/01/Sicilia.pdf.
  • GrantD, Kravitz-WirtzN, BreenN, TiroJA, TsuiJ. One in four California adolescent girls have had human papillomavirus vaccination. Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res2009; PB2009-3:PB2009-31 - 6; PMID: 19288623
  • AllenJD, MohllajeeAP, SheltonRC, OthusMK, FontenotHB, HannaR. Stage of adoption of the human papillomavirus vaccine among college women. Prev Med2009; 48:420 - 5; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.12.005; PMID: 19133288
  • GriffioenAM, GlynnS, MullinsTK, ZimetGD, RosenthalSL, FortenberryJD, KahnJA. Perspectives on decision making about human papillomavirus vaccination among 11- to 12-year-old girls and their mothers. Clin Pediatr (Phila)2012; 51:560 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0009922812443732; PMID: 22589477
  • KesselsSJ, MarshallHS, WatsonM, Braunack-MayerAJ, ReuzelR, TooherRL. Factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake in teenage girls: a systematic review. Vaccine2012; 30:3546 - 56; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.063; PMID: 22480928
  • SkinnerSR, Cooper RobbinsSC. Voluntary school-based human papillomavirus vaccination: an efficient and acceptable model for achieving high vaccine coverage in adolescents. J Adolesc Health2010; 47:215 - 8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.002; PMID: 20708557
  • DickeySB, DeatrickJ. Autonomy and decision making for health promotion in adolescence. Pediatr Nurs2000; 26:461 - 7; PMID: 12026335
  • MortensenGL. Drivers and barriers to acceptance of human-papillomavirus vaccination among young women: a qualitative and quantitative study. BMC Public Health2010; 10:68; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-68; PMID: 20152055
  • PelucchiC, EspositoS, GaleoneC, SeminoM, SabatiniC, PicciolliI, ConsoloS, MilaniG, PrincipiN. Knowledge of human papillomavirus infection and its prevention among adolescents and parents in the greater Milan area, Northern Italy. BMC Public Health2010; 10:378; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-378; PMID: 20584324

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.