899
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communication

“What we’ve got here is failure to communicate”

Zou mutants and endosperm cell death in seed development

, , &
Article: e24368 | Received 11 Mar 2013, Accepted 19 Mar 2013, Published online: 26 Mar 2013

Abstract

ZHOUPI, a unique and highly conserved bHLH transcription factor, controls both endosperm breakdown and embryonic surface formation during Arabidopsis seed development. We have demonstrated that these two processes are distinct, and that ZHOUPI regulates embryonic surface formation via a signaling pathway mediated by the subtilisin-like serine protease ABNORMAL LEAF SHAPE1, and the receptor-kinases GASSHO1 and GASSHO2. Gene expression profiling in mutant backgrounds has permitted the identification of genes whose expression depends on both ZHOUPI and ABNORMAL LEAF SHAPE1 and genes whose expression depends uniquely on ZHOUPI. The latter are presumably involved specifically in endosperm breakdown, and we discuss this poorly understood process in the light of our results. Finally, we consider the potential ancestral role of ZHOUPI and discuss how its relationship with ABNORMAL LEAF SHAPE1 may have evolved.

The development of angiosperm seed, upon which human life depends, requires the coordinated growth of the embryo and the surrounding endosperm. In Arabidopsis and many other plants the endosperm progressively degrades as it is invaded by the growing embryo during seed development so that at maturity the seed is filled by the embryo and only a single layer of endosperm remains.Citation1 Surprisingly, little is known about the molecular basis for the breakdown of the endosperm or whether mechanistically it resembles other forms of developmental cell death. Here, mutants in the Arabidopsis ZHOUPI (ZOU) gene may shed light. In zou mutants, the endosperm fails to break down so that at maturity the seed has a small embryo and a pouch of persistent endosperm. The interpretation of this defect is complicated however by a second feature of the mutant phenotype: zou embryos give rise to seedlings with a defective epidermis and cuticle in their cotyledons. This is striking because ZOU is not expressed in the embryo or seedling, but rather in a specialized layer of endosperm (ESR) that surrounds the embryo.Citation2 Therefore, ZOU mediates a signal from the ESR to the embryo promoting cuticle and or epidermal development. Unlike wild type embryos which become separated from the surrounding endosperm around the time the endosperm cellularizes, zou embryos remain tightly stuck to the endosperm, presumably due to defects in their cuticles. This raises the problem of whether the persistent endosperm of zou mutants reflects a direct role for ZOU in promoting cell death in ESR cells, or whether it is an indirect effect of the adhesion of embryo to endosperm preventing the embryo from enlarging and invading the endosperm. We recently resolved this problem using a transgenic approach.Citation3

The transcription of ALE1, which encodes an ESR-specific subtilisin-like serine proteaseCitation4 is strongly down regulated in the zou mutant.Citation2 Because ale1 mutants have an epidermal phenotype similar to that of zou mutants, ALE1 likely mediates ZOU’s role in promoting embryo cuticle formation. Indeed, when we restored ALE1 expression in zou mutants by introducing an ALE1 transgene controlled by an ESR-specific promoter, the zou epidermal phenotype was ameliorated but the persistent endosperm defect was unchanged.Citation3 This indicates that ZOU positively regulates two distinct processes in seed development: embryo epidermal development through ALE1-mediated signaling and endosperm breakdown through a separate pathway.

ZOU Promotes Signaling from the Endosperm to the Embryo

Our genetic analysis elucidated additional key molecular components of the ALE1-mediated signaling pathway. Backgrounds in which the redundant receptor like kinases GSO1 and GSO2 are lost have a severely defective cotyledon epidermis.Citation5 Epistasis between the mutant phenotypes of zou, ale1 and the gso1/gso2 double mutant indicates that they likely function in the same epidermal development pathway.Citation3 ZOU is necessary for transcription of ALE1 in the ESR. Other subtilases have been shown to cleave peptides to give their active forms.Citation6,Citation7 We propose that this may be the function of ALE1 in the endosperm. A putative peptide, processed by ALE1, could act as a ligand for the embryo-expressed GSO1/GSO2 RLKs; the resulting signal transduction positively regulating embryo epidermal development.

Developmental Cell Death in Plants

Plant cell death is morphologically distinct from the relatively well characterized apoptotic Programmed Cell Death (PCD) of animals and has been broadly categorized into two types, vacuolar and necrotic.Citation8 Although many of the key cell death regulators in animals, such as caspases, are not conserved in plants, structurally related proteins, for example metacaspases, may play a role.Citation9,Citation10 The Hypersensitive Response (HR), which results in localized cell death circumscribing points of infection, is the best studied PCD-like process in plants.Citation11 The HR employs dissociation of the mitochondrial respiratory transport chain to release Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), which act to disrupt membrane integrity through peroxidation of lipids. Some effectors of HR cell death may also contribute to developmental cell death, but initiation is likely triggered by different mechanisms. Developmental cell death has been characterized in relation to various processes, including organ abscission, integument development, xylem differentiation, senescence and aerenchyma formation.Citation8 Although several cell death promoting peptides and corresponding signaling pathways have been identified, in most cases the components are specific for particular processes.Citation12-Citation14 Endosperm breakdown is in some ways most similar to aerenchyma formation and abscission, in that the cell walls are completely digested but it remains unclear to what extent the underlying mechanisms are similar to these or other developmental cell death pathways. The ZOU gene provides a valuable tool to address this question; because it encodes a bHLH transcription factor, its target genes are likely to include many of the genes initiating or executing endosperm breakdown.

Identifying the Targets of ZOU

We have used RNA sequencing to compare transcriptional profiles of wild-type, ale1 and zou siliques. At the heart stage of embryo development, just before zou seeds become morphologically distinct from wild-type seeds, 180 genes were downregulated more than 2-fold in zou relative to wild type, whereas 85 were upregulated. At the torpedo stage, when the embryo is invading the degrading endosperm, 326 genes were downregulated and 162 were upregulated in zou mutants. The fact that nearly twice as many genes are down as upregulated in mutants suggests that ZOU is a transcriptional activator. When we compared the genes downregulated in ale1 and zou mutants, we found fewer targets overall in ale1 mutants (93 and 189 genes at heart and torpedo, respectively) consistent with the milder ale1 phenotype. A high proportion of the ALE1 targets were also targets of ZOU (60% of genes at heart stage and 46% at torpedo stage). Such an overlap is highly unlikely by chance and reflects the fact that ZOU and ALE1 act in a common pathway. Since ALE1 functions in epidermal development but not endosperm breakdown, the genes that are targets of ZOU but not of ALE1 should be enriched for mediators of the cell-death promoting role of ZOU. We identified a total of 336 ZOU specific targets at heart and/or torpedo stage. Genes encoding key regulators of developmental cell death, including peptide ligands such as INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSIONCitation12 or KISS OF DEATH,Citation13 are not regulated by ZOU, which suggests that endosperm breakdown may involve other factors. Gene Ontology analysis shows an over-representation of cell death-associated ontologies, such as “ROS Responsive” and “Cell Wall Modification.” The prevalence of cell wall modification genes is consistent with the fact that cell walls are completely degraded during endosperm breakdown, while the ROS responsive category may reflect overlap with downstream components of the HR response. Mutant and gain of function analyses may help to test the role of these candidate genes in cell death.

Ancestral Roles of ZOU

Phylogenetic analysis indicates that ZOU is ancient.Citation2,Citation3 It is conserved not only in angiosperms but also in gymnosperms and the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorfii. Intriguingly the ZOU target ALE1 does not have clear orthologs outside angiosperms. It is possible therefore that the function of ZOU in tissue breakdown may be ancient while its role in controlling ALE1 to promote epidermal development may have been acquired during the angiosperm radiation. Linking female gametophyte proliferation to fertilization (the advent of endosperm) may have presented new challenges in epidermal development for angiosperm embryos. The concomitant development of the endosperm with the embryo, and in particular its cellularization, may have made it difficult for the embryo to maintain a clear boundary in the form of a cuticularized epidermal cell wall. Consistent with this, ZOU is not required for cuticle formation in the absence of endosperm, for example in adult leaves and flowers, while the phenomenon of somatic embryogenesis indicates that endosperm may not be needed for cuticle development. Within the angiosperms, ZOU is conserved in cereals such as rice and maize which are genetically accessible. However, endosperm development in cereals is different from that in Arabidopsis as the bulk of the endosperm persists at seed maturity and is not degraded until after germination. Determining where ZOU is expressed in cereals and whether mutation affects endosperm and/or embryonic development will therefore be interesting. ZOU is also conserved in dicot species whose seed have relatively persistent endosperm, such as castor bean and grape, in which it will be possible to test the relative duration of ZOU expression during seed development.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • Olsen OA. Nuclear endosperm development in cereals and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2004; 16:Suppl S214 - 27; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.017111; PMID: 15010513
  • Yang S, Johnston N, Talideh E, Mitchell S, Jeffree C, Goodrich J, et al. The endosperm-specific ZHOUPI gene of Arabidopsis thaliana regulates endosperm breakdown and embryonic epidermal development. Development 2008; 135:3501 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.026708; PMID: 18849529
  • Xing Q, Creff A, Waters A, Tanaka H, Goodrich J, Ingram GC. ZHOUPI controls embryonic cuticle formation via a signalling pathway involving the subtilisin protease ABNORMAL LEAF-SHAPE1 and the receptor kinases GASSHO1 and GASSHO2. Development 2013; 140:770 - 9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.088898; PMID: 23318634
  • Tanaka H, Onouchi H, Kondo M, Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M, Machida C, et al. A subtilisin-like serine protease is required for epidermal surface formation in Arabidopsis embryos and juvenile plants. Development 2001; 128:4681 - 9; PMID: 11731449
  • Tsuwamoto R, Fukuoka H, Takahata Y. GASSHO1 and GASSHO2 encoding a putative leucine-rich repeat transmembrane-type receptor kinase are essential for the normal development of the epidermal surface in Arabidopsis embryos. Plant J 2008; 54:30 - 42; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03395.x; PMID: 18088309
  • Julius D, Brake A, Blair L, Kunisawa R, Thorner J. Isolation of the putative structural gene for the lysine-arginine-cleaving endopeptidase required for processing of yeast prepro-alpha-factor. Cell 1984; 37:1075 - 89; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(84)90442-2; PMID: 6430565
  • Srivastava R, Liu JX, Howell SH. Proteolytic processing of a precursor protein for a growth-promoting peptide by a subtilisin serine protease in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2008; 56:219 - 27; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03598.x; PMID: 18643977
  • van Doorn WG, Beers EP, Dangl JL, Franklin-Tong VE, Gallois P, Hara-Nishimura I, et al. Morphological classification of plant cell deaths. Cell Death Differ 2011; 18:1241 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2011.36; PMID: 21494263
  • Lam E. Controlled cell death, plant survival and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5:305 - 15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1358; PMID: 15071555
  • Coll NS, Vercammen D, Smidler A, Clover C, Van Breusegem F, Dangl JL, et al. Arabidopsis type I metacaspases control cell death. Science 2010; 330:1393 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1194980; PMID: 21097903
  • Mur LA, Kenton P, Lloyd AJ, Ougham H, Prats E. The hypersensitive response; the centenary is upon us but how much do we know?. J Exp Bot 2008; 59:501 - 20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm239; PMID: 18079135
  • Butenko MA, Patterson SE, Grini PE, Stenvik GE, Amundsen SS, Mandal A, et al. Inflorescence deficient in abscission controls floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis and identifies a novel family of putative ligands in plants. Plant Cell 2003; 15:2296 - 307; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.014365; PMID: 12972671
  • Blanvillain R, Young B, Cai YM, Hecht V, Varoquaux F, Delorme V, et al. The Arabidopsis peptide kiss of death is an inducer of programmed cell death. EMBO J 2011; 30:1173 - 83; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.14; PMID: 21326210
  • Liljegren SJ. Organ abscission: exit strategies require signals and moving traffic. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2012; 15:670 - 6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.09.012; PMID: 23047135

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.