Post-translational modifications mediated by reactive nitrogen species

Abstract

In animal cells, nitric oxide and NO-derived molecules have been shown to mediate post-translational modifications such as S-nitrosylation and protein tyrosine nitration which are associated with cell signalling and pathological processes, respectively. In plant cells, knowledge of the function of these post-translational modifications under physiological and stress conditions is still very rudimentary. In this addendum, we briefly examine how reactive nitrogen species (RNS) can exert important effects on proteins that could mediate signalling processes in plants.

Introduction

The molecule nitric oxide or nitrogen monoxide (NO) has a long chemical history, but in the last 20 years, it has become the centre of research in many different areas of biology and medicine. In 1772 Joseph Priestley characterized NO as a colourless, no flammable, odourless and toxic gas.1 After the industrial revolution, this compound was only studied as a component of air pollution because NO was involved in the acid rain and in the ozone layer destruction. In 1979, Klepper reported that plants can generate nitric oxide,2 but this publication did not attract the attention of plant researchers until 1987, when nitric oxide was identified as the endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) by Palmer et al.3 This finding marked the beginning of a new research era in biological systems, as evidenced by the more than 84,000 papers that have been published in the last 20 years concerning nitric oxide biology. In plants, in mid 90s some reports started to remember that plants, as demonstrated by Klepper (1979), could also produce NO, and that this molecule had an ample spectrum of physiological functions as signalling molecule. Although there are still some shadows in the research of NO in plants such as the identification of the enzymatic source/s of NO in physiological and adverse conditions, NO and NO-related molecules are today one of the main research areas in plant physiology4 because some of the NO effects are due to its direct or indirect interaction with proteins.

Proteins can suffer different post-translational modifications that can affect its activity, conformation, folding, distribution, stability, and therefore its function. These post-translational modifications include formylation, hydroxylation, glycosylation, methylation, oxidation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, etc. To consider that a certain post-translational modification has physiological significance in cell signalling it must meet several criteria: (i) it must be specific and reversible; (ii) its formation must occur on a physiological time-scale; and (iii) depending on the target, the modification should result in either activation or inhibition.5 Thus, protein phosphorylation is an excellent example of cell signalling.

Nitric oxide (NO) and NO-derived molecules have become one of the most interesting molecules in plant physiology due to the broad spectrum of actions they carry out, including signalling processes. Recently, we reported that salinity induces nitrosative stress in olive plants and we proposed that protein tyrosine nitration could be a good biomarker for nitrosative stress in these plants.6 In this addendum, we describe some additional considerations on the significance of post-translational modifications mediated by reactive nitrogen species (RNS) in the homeostasis of plant cells.

Protein S-nitrosylation

This post-translational modification consists in the binding of a NO group to a cysteine residue of a protein and can alter the function of a broad spectrum of proteins.7 In animal organisms, the S-nitrosylation process is involved in a certain number of patho-physiological situations which can contribute to the generation of nitrosative stress,8 but in plant cells there is much less information on this post-translational modification.9 By proteomics approaches, some putative protein targets for S-nitrosylation have been identified, including cytoskeleton, metabolic, redox-related, stress-related, and signalling/regulating proteins.10 However, only for few proteins there is experimental evidence that they are regulated by this post-translational modification. Thus, in Arabidopsis, nonsymbiotic hemoglobin (AHb1) scavenges NO with production of S-nitrosohemoglobin and reduces NO emission under hypoxic stress.11 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase suffers a reversible inhibition by NO,10 and methionine adenosyltransferase is inhibited by S-nitrosylation.12 The Arabidopsis type-II metacaspase AtMC9 blocks the autoprocessing and activation of AtMC9 zymogen through S-nitrosylation of its catalytic cysteine residue.13 Recently, it has been shown that the S-nitrosylation in the conserved Cys53 of the transcription factor AtMYB2 inhibits its bind to DNA.14 This transcription factor is usually expressed in response to hypoxia, salinity, water stress and ABA. Other potential candidates are the peroxiredoxins which possess one or two active cysteines.

Protein Tyrosine Nitration

This reaction consists in the addition of a nitro group (-NO₂) to one of the two equivalent ortho carbons of the aromatic ring of tyrosine residues.15 This post-translational modification seems to be mediated by peroxynitrite (ONOO⁻),16 a powerful oxidant which is the result of the quick reaction between superoxide radicals (O₂^{• -}) and nitric oxide (k = 1.9 × 10¹⁰ M ⁻¹ s⁻¹).17 In animal cells, protein tyrosine nitration is starting to be used as a biomarker of pathological states and nitrosative stress18–21 because this process can alter the conformation and structure of proteins, the catalytic activity of enzymes, and its susceptibility to proteolysis. Recent experimental data obtained seem to indicate that nitro-tyrosine could also be used as a marker of nitrosative stress in plants.6,23,24 Nevertheless, it must be said that there are also data in animal systems indicating that under physiological conditions some proteins are specifically nitrated.25–27 This suggests that, in some cases, protein tyrosine nitration could be reversible and be involved in signaling.5,18 Thus, it has been described the existence of a nitro-tyrosine denitrase activity which has the capacity to remove specific nitro-tyrosine residues in proteins22,28 and this process was dependent on NO biosynthesis de novo.5,29,30

Figure 1 shows a model with the elements described in this addendum considering that the chemical mechanisms are not totally understood. Thus, nitric oxide and GSNO can mediate the S-nitrosylation of proteins, but could S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) catalyze the reverse reaction? Alternatively, protein tyrosine nitration can be induced by peroxinitrite (ONOO⁻), a process that can be mediated by metalloproteins, peroxidases or transition metals.8 On the other hand, the recently described enzyme nitro-tyrosine denitrase could remove specific nitro-tyrosine residues in proteins and therefore could make this process reversible. These two processes, together or separately, could contribute to cell signalling.

Outlook

The identification of the enzymatic sources of NO in plant cells and its subcellular localization will be essential to identify NO protein targets and their functions. Thus, information on the cell compartmentalization of these post-translational modified proteins could be very important to understand the cross-talk between cell organelles mediated by NO or NO-derived molecules. The identification of a possible nitro-tyrosine denitrase activity in plants could also help evaluate whether this process could contribute to cell signalling like S-nitrosylation.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1 Hypothetical model of pathways of protein post-translational modifications (S-nitrosylation and tyrosine nitration) mediated by reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and its involvement in plant cell signalling.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education and Science (BIO2006-14949-C02-01 and BIO2006-14949-C02-02) and Junta de Andalucía (groups CVI 192 and CVI 286).

Addendum to: