Observations on Some Aspects of Current Psychoanalytic Theories

REFERENCES

• Adler, A. (1920). The Theory and Practice of Individual Psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1940.
   Google Scholar
• Beckerton, D. (1990). Language and Species. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, pp. 110–112.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1968). Psychoanalysis and science. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 16: 675–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1973). An Elementary Textbook of Psychoanalysis, Second Edition. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1976). Psychoanalytic Technique and Psychic Conflict. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1982). The Mind in Conflict. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1988). Of men and monuments. In Fantasy, Myth, and Reality, ed. H. P. Blum, Y. Kramer, A. K. Richards, & A. D. Richards. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1994a). The mind as conflict and compromise formation. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 3: 473–488.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1994b). Unpublished contribution to a discussion entitled “What is a clinical fact in psychoanalysis?” Int. J. Psychoanal., 75: 865–1050.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1998). Beyond the ego and the id revisited. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 7: 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1963). Synopsis of an object relations theory of the personality. Int. J. Psychoanal., 44: 224–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, B. (1955). Psychological theory and the belief in God. Int. J. Psychoanal., 36: 187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenichel, O. (1941). Problems of Psychoanalytic Technique. Albany, NY: Psychoanal. Q.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, 1946.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1894). The neuropsychoses of defence. S. E., 3: 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. S. E., 7: 135–243.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. S. E., 20: 87–172.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1976). Metapsychology is not psychology. Psychological Issues, #36, ed. M. M. Gill & P. Holzman. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 71–105.
   Google Scholar
• Guntrip, H. (1967). The concept of psychodynamic science. Int. J. Psychoanal., 48: 32–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntrip, H. (1975). My experience of analysis with Fairbairn and Winnicott. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 2: 145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horney, K. (1937). The Neurotic Personality of Our Time. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Imber, R. (1998). Contribution to panel on Psychoanalytic Classics Revisited: The Ego and the Id and Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety. Annual Meeting of Amer. Psychoanalytic Assn., Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, S. (1939). Criteria for interpretation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 20: 148–160.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1915). The Theory of Psychoanalysis. New York: J. Nervous and Mental Disease.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. R. (1998). A new intellectual framework for psychiatry. Amer. J. Psychiatry, 155: 457–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (1948). Contributions to Psychoanalysis, 1921–1945. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1982). Introspection, empathy, and the semicircle of mental health. Int. J. Psychoanal., 33: 395–408.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, S. (1973). Psychoanalytic interpretation. Psychoanal. Study Child, 28: 305–330.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, S. (1977). The significance of Jacques Lacan. Psychoanal. Q., 46: 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lionells, M. (1999). Contribution to discussion at Conference of Journals of PEP-CD ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1996). Contribution to discussion of “The analyst’s knowledge and authority.” Meeting of New York Psychoanalytic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1998). The analyst’s knowledge and authority. Psychoanal. Q., 67: 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. & Greenberg, J. (1983). Object Relations and Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, A. (1998). Contribution to panel on “Psychoanalytic Classics Revisited: The Ego and the Id and Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety.” Annual Meeting of Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Nachman, P. (1998). Maternal identification: a description of the process in real time. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 46: 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliner, M. M. (1988). Cultivating Freud’s Garden in France. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Peskin, M. M. (1997). Drive theory revisited. Psychoanal. Q., 66: 377–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangell, L. (1997). The unitary theory of Leo Rangell, M.D. J. Clin. Psychoanal., 6: 453–592.
   Google Scholar
• Rascovsky, A. (1956). Beyond the oral stage. Int. J. Psychoanal., 37: 286–289.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, W. (1942). The Function of the Orgasm (The Discovery of the Orgone, Vol. 1). New York: Orgone Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and Philosophy. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1977). The question of proof in Freud’s writings. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 25: 835–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, C. H. (1941). The Scientific Attitude. London: Pelican Books.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1958). The First Year of Life. In The Family and Individual Development. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. Int. J. Psychoanal., 41: 585–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1962). The theory of the parent-infant relationship—further remarks. Int. J. Psychoanal., 43: 238–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, P. H. (1996). The irrelevance of infant observations for psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44: 369–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar