The Holding Environment and Intersubjectivity

REFERENCES

• Aron, L. (1992). From Ferenczi to Searles and contemporary relational approaches: commentary on Mark Blechner’s “Working in the Countertransference.” Psychoanal. Dialogues, 2: 181–190.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, A. (1996). Holding, holding back, and holding on. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 6: 361–378.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1988). The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Beres, D. & Arlow, L. A. (1974). Fantasy and identification in empathy. Psychoanal. Q., 43: 26–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, D. M. (1987). Clinical Empathy. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from Experience. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1963). Elements of Psychoanalysis. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1967). Second Thoughts. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1989). Forces of Destiny. London: Free Assn. Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bolognini, S. (1997). Empathy and “empathism.” Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 279–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1991). On knowing one’s patient inside out: the aesthetics of unconscious communication. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1: 399–422.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1993). Shadow and substance: a relational perspective on clinical process. Psychoanal. Psychol., 10: 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1994). “Speak! that I may see you”: some reflections on dissociation, reality, and psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 4: 517–547.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. M. (1998). Standing in the Spaces: Essays on Clinical Process, Trauma, and Dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, D. B. (1992). The Intimate Edge: Extending the Reach of Psychoanalytic Interaction. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. R. (1952). Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. (1997). Projective identification: the analyst’s involvement. Int. J. Psychoanal., 78: 227–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliess, R. (1942). The metapsychology of the analyst. Psychoanal. Q., 11: 211–227.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. M. (1982). The Analysis of Transference, Vol. 1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginot, E. (1997). The analyst’s use of self, self-disclosure, and enhanced integration. Psychoanal. Psychol., 14: 365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1986). Theoretical models and the analyst’s neutrality. Contemp. Psychoanal., 22: 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, G. N. (1990). The containing function and the analyst’s projective identification. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 71: 445–453.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, P. (1950). On countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 35: 81–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. (1992). Some practical implications of a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 2: 287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. (1996). The intimate and ironic authority of the psychoanalyst’s presence. Psychoanal. Q., 65: 102–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs. T. J. (1991). The Use of the Self. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of Self. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1993). Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1996). When interpretation fails: a new look at the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis. In Understanding Therapeutic Action: Psychodynamic Concepts of Cure, ed. L. E. Lifson. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 165–186.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1997). Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Natterson, J. (1991). Beyond Countertransference: The Analyst’s Subjectivity in the Therapeutic Process. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Natterson, J. & Friedman, R. (1995). A Primer of Clinical Intersubjectivity. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1986). The Matrix of the Mind: Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. (1994). Subjects of Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Pick, I. B. (1985). Working through in the countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 66: 157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racker, H. (1968). Transference and Counter-Transference. New York: New York Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 62, 553–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanal. Q., 65: 495–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. (1959). Generative empathy in the treatment situation. Psychoanal. Q., 28: 347–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharff, J. S. (1992). Projective and Introjective Identification and the Use of the Analyst’s Self. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaber, E. (1983). Listening and psychic reality. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 10: 379–392.
   Google Scholar
• Schwaber, E. (1995). Toward a definition of the term and concept of interaction. Int. J. Psychoanal., 76: 557–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slochower, J. (1996). Holding and Psychoanalysis: A Relational Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, M. (1996). From structural conflict to relational conflict: a contemporary model of therapeutic action. In Understanding Therapeutic Action: Psychodynamic Concepts of Cure, ed. L. E. Lifson. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. & Atwood, G. (1997). Deconstructing the myth of the neutral analyst: an alternative from intersubjective system theory. Psychoanal. Q., 66: 431–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansey, M. J. & Burke, W. (1995). Understanding Countertransference: From Projective Identification to Empathy. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1948) Paediatrics and psychiatry. In Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis. New York: Basic Books, 1975, pp. 157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1951) Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books, 1971, pp. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1954) Withdrawal and regression. In Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis. New York: Basic Books, 1975, pp. 255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1956) Primary maternal preoccupation. In Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis. New York: Basic Books, 1975, pp. 300–305.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1959). Classification: is there a psycho-analytic contribution to psychiatric classification? In The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1965, pp. 124–139.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1960a) Ego distortions in terms of true and false self. In The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1965, pp. 140–152.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1960b) The theory of the parent—infant relationship. In The Maturational Process and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1965, pp. 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Holding and Interpretation: Fragments of an Analysis. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar