Wrestling with Matter: Origins of Intersubjectivity

REFERENCES

• Aron, L. (1991). The patient’s experience of the analyst’s subjectivity. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1: 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (2005). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, L. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87: 349–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwood, G. (2006). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B. & Lachmann, F. (1994). Representation and internalization in infancy: three principles of salience. Psychoanal. Psychol., 11: 127–165.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., Rustin, J., Sorter, D. & Knoblauch, S. (2003). An expanded view of intersubjectivity in infancy and its application to psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 13: 805–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe, B., Sorter, D., Rustin, J., & Knoblauch, S. (2003). A comparison of Meltzoff, Trevarthen, and Stern. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 13: 777–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1995). Like Subjects, Love Objects. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (1998). Shadow of the Other: Intersubjectivity and Gender in Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: an intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanal. Q., 73: 5–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from Experience. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1992). Being a Character: Psychoanalysis and Self-Experience. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, M. (2004). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Bromberg, P. (1998). Standing in the Spaces. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell, M. (1998). Triangulation, one’s own mind and objectivity. Int. J. Psychoanal., 79: 449–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, J. & Tronick, E. (1987). Mother—infant face-to-face interaction: the sequence of dyadic states at 3, 6, and 9 months. Devel. Psychol., 23: 68–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1989). The conditions of mind. In The Mind of Donald Davidson, ed. J. Brandl & W. L. Gomocz. Amsterdam, Holland: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1992). The Second Person. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 17: 255–267.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. & Target, M. (2002). Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. & Target, M. (1998). Mentalization and the changing aims of child psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 8: 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. S. E., 4/5.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. S. E., 19.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1933). New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. S. E., 22.
   Google Scholar
• Frie, R. & Reis, B. (2005). From theory through practice. In Relational and Intersubjective Trends in Psychoanalysis, ed. J. Mills. New York: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Gentile, J. (1998). Listening for deep structure: between the a priori and the intersubjective. Contemp. Psychoanal., 34: 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, J. (2001). Close but no cigar: the perversion of agency and the absence of thirdness. Contemp. Psychoanal., 37: 623–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolization, and absence in the analytic setting. Int. J. Psychoanal., 56: 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurewich, J. F. (1999). Who’s afraid of Jacques Lacan? In Lacan and the New Wave in American Psychoanalysis, ed. J. F. Gurewich & M. Tort. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. (1998). Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, L. (2003). Mitchell’s return to Freud: a review essay on two books by Stephen Mitchell. Contemp. Psychoanal., 39: 509–530.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C. & Jasonow, M. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy. In Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66(2 Serial No. 264).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (1953). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In Ecrits: A Selection, trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Norton, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (19541955). The ego in Freud’s theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis. In The Seminars of Jacques Lacan, Book II, ed. J. A. Miller. New York: Norton, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Meares, R. (1997). Stimulus entrapment: on a common basis of somatization. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 17: 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. (1985). The roots of social and cognitive development: models of man’s original nature. In Social Perception in Infants, ed. T. Field & N. Fox. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzoff, A. & Moore, N. (1998). Infant intersubjectivity: broadening the dialogue to include imitation, identity, and intention. In Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny, ed. S. Braten. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. (1999). The Creation of Reality in Psychoanalysis. New York: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. (1996). Beyond the Psychoanalytic Dyad: Developmental Semiotics in Freud, Peirce, and Lacan. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1986). The Matrix of the Mind. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (1994). Subjects of Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. (2004). The analytic third: implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanal. Q., 73: 167–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, D. (2001). From Cartesian minds to experiential worlds in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Psychol., 18: 87–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange, D., Atwood, G. & Stolorow, R. (1997). Working Intersubjectively. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pizer, S. (1992). The negotiation of paradox in the analytic process. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 2: 215–240.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (2004). Intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 85: 1053–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searles, H. (1960). The Nonhuman Environment in Normal Development and in Schizophrenia. NY: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, H. (1957). Notes on symbol formation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 38: 391–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slavin, J. & Pollock, L. (1997). The poisoning of desire: the destruction of agency and the recovery of psychic integrity in sexual abuse. Contemp. Psychoanal., 33: 573–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, M. & Kriegman, D. (1992). The Adaptive Design of the Human Psyche: Psychoanalysis, Evolutionary Biology, and the Therapeutic Process. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, M. & Kriegman, D. (1998). Why the analyst needs to change. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 8: 247–284.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. (1985). The Interpersonal World of the Infant. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. (1997). Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R., Orange, D. & Atwood, G. (2001). Cartesian and post-cartesian trends in relational psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Psychol., 18: 468–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1989). Signs before Speech: The Semiotic Web, ed. T. Sebeok. New York: Moutonde Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1993). The self born in intersubjectivity: the psychology of an infant communicating. In Ecological and Interpersonal Knowledge of the Self, ed. U. Neisser. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trevarthen, C. (1998). The concept and foundation of infant intersubjectivity. In Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny, ed. S. Braten. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. Amer. Psychol., 44: 112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronick, E. & Cohn, J. (1989). Infant—mother face-to-face interaction: age and gender differences in coordination and the occurrence of miscoordination. Child Devel., 60: 85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1949). Mind and its relation to the psyche-soma. In Through Paediatrics to Psychoanalysis: Collected Papers. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1951). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1956). Primary maternal preoccupation. In Through Paediatrics to Psychoanalysis: Collected Papers. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1960). Ego distortion in terms of true and false self. In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1968). The use of an object and playing through identifications. In Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1971a). Playing: a theoretical statement. In Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. (1971b). Creativity and its origins. In Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, N., Gales, M., Shane, E. & Shane, M. (2001). The developmental trajectory from amodal perception to empathy and communication: the role of mirror neurons in this process. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 21: 94–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, P. (1987). The Development of Behavioral States and the Expression of Emotions in Infancy: New Proposals for Investigation. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar