REFERENCES
- Boesky, D. (2005). Psychoanalytic controversies contextualized. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 53(3): 835–864.
- Boston Change Process Study Group (2005). The “something more” than interpretation revisited: sloppiness and co-creativity in the psychoanalytic encounter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 53(3): 694–729.
- Fenichel, O. (1945). The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis. New York: Norton.
- Foehl, J. C. (2005). “How could this happen to me?”: sexual misconduct and us [panel report]. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 53(2): 957–970.
- Gabbard, G. O. (1999). Boundary violations. In Psychiatric Ethics, ed. S. Block, P. Chodoroff & S. A. Green. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 141–160.
- Gabbard, G. O. (2005). Patient—therapist boundary issues. Psychiatric Times, 25(October): 28–33.
- Gabbard, G. O. & Lester, E. P. (2003). Boundaries and Boundary Violations in Psychoanalysis. Washington, DC: Amer. Psychiatric Publishing.
- Gabbard, G. O. & Peltz, M. L. (2001). Speaking the unspeakable: institutional reactions to boundary violations by training analysts. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49(2): 659–673.
- Goldberg, A. (2004). A risk of confidentiality. Int. J. Psychoanal., 85: 301–310.
- Goldberg, A. (2007). Moral Stealth: How “Correct Behavior” Insinuates Itself into Psychotherapeutic Practice. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
- Greenberg, J. (2001). The analyst’s participation: a new look. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49(2): 359–426.
- Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
- Lear, J. (2003). Confidentiality as a virtue. In Confidentiality: Ethical Perspectives and Clinical Dilemmas, ed. C. Levin, A. Furlong & M. O’Neil. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 3–18.
- Nietzsche, F. (1878). Menschliches, Allzumenschiches (Human, All Too Human), trans. M. Faber & S. Lehmann. Lincoln, NB: Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1996.