The Reluctance to Self-Disclose: Reflexive or Reasoned?

REFERENCES

• Abend, S. (1995). Discussion of Jay Greenberg’s paper on self-disclosure. Contemp. Psychoanal., 31: 207–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar, M. (2011). On the analyst’s capacity to play. Paper presented on panel entitled “Play and Playfulness.” Meeting of Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., June, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Arlow, J. (2010). Unpublished papers of Jacob Arlow: comments on the psychoanalytic curriculum. Bull. Psychoanal. Assn. of NY, 48(2): 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bibring, E. (1954). Psychoanalysis and the dynamic psychotherapies. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2: 745–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blass, R. B. (2010). An introduction to “Distinguishing Psychoanalysis from Psychotherapy.” Int. J. Psychoanal., 91: 15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, H. P. (1992). Psychic change: the analytic relationship(s) and agents of change. Int. J. Psychoanal., 73: 255–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1987). The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, M. (2004). The problem of narcissism in psychoanalytic organizations: the insularity of power. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 24: 71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1982). The Mind in Conflict. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. (1996). The nature of knowledge and the limits of authority in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 65: 21–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, W. F. (1992). Countertransference disclosure and the asymmetry/mutuality dilemma. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 2: 241–271.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, F. (1995). The Ego at the Center of Clinical Technique. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, F. (1998). Self-disclosure ain’t what it’s cracked up to be, at least not yet. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 18: 518–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, F. (1999). Rethinking Clinical Technique. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Chused, J. F. (1996). The therapeutic action of psychoanalysis: abstinence and informative experience. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44: 1047–1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. H. (1998). Analyst subjectivity, analyst disclosure, and the aims of psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Q., 67: 379–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. M. (1994). Love in the afternoon. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 4: 153–170.
   Google Scholar
• Ellman, C. (2011). Anonymity: blank screen or black hole. In A New Freudian Synthesis: Clinical Process in the Next Generation, ed. A. B. Druck, C. Ellman, N. Freedman & A. Thaler. London: Karnac, pp. 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Fosshage, J. F. (1997). Psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapy: is there a meaningful distinction in the process? Psychoanal. Psychol., 14: 409–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1919). Lines of advance in psycho-analytic therapy. S. E., 17.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. O. (2009). What is a “good enough” termination? J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 57: 575–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, M. (1982). Analysis of Transference, Vol. 1. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginot, E. (1997). The analyst’s use of self, self-disclosure, and enhanced integration. Psychoanal. Psychol., 14: 365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, P. (1994). The Ego and Analysis of Defense. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1986). Theoretical models and the analyst’s neutrality. Contemp. Psychoanal., 22: 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1995). Self-disclosure: is it psychoanalytic? Contemp. Psychoanal., 31: 193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, W. (1995). Psychological vicissitudes of theory in clinical work. Int. J. Psychoanal., 76: 885–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanly, C. (1998). Reflections on the analyst’s self-disclosure. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 18: 550–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inderbitzin, L. B. & Levy, S. T. (2000). Regression and psychoanalytic technique: the concretization of a concept. Psychoanal. Q., 69: 195–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. J. (1999). On the question of self-disclosure by the analyst: error or advance in technique? Psychoanal. Q., 68: 159–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (1996). Thirty methods to destroy the creativity of psychoanalytic candidates. Int. J. Psychoanal., 77: 1031–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2004). Discussion: “Problems of Power in Psychoanalytic Institutions.” Psychoanal. Inquiry, 24: 106–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2006). The coming changes in psychoanalytic education, part 1. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87: 1649–1673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F. (2007). The coming changes in psychoanalytic education, part 2. Int. J. Psychoanal., 88: 183–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. F., Burstein, E. D., Coyne, L., Appelbaum, A., Horwitz, L. & Voth, H. (1972). Psychotherapy and psychoanalysis: final report of the Menninger Foundation’s psychotherapy research project. Bull. Menninger Clin., 36: 3–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, J. V. (2008). Ideas of influence: the impact of the analyst’s character on the analysis. Psychoanal. Q., 77: 1075–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt & Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, F. J. (2003) The forbidden quest and the slippery slope: roots of authoritarianism in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 51(suppl.): 203–245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipton, S. D. (1977). The advantages of Freud’s technique as shown in his analysis of the Rat Man. Int. J. Psychoanal., 58: 255–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, D. M. (1998). Self-disclosure: the wrong issue. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 18: 566–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. T. (1996). Power, authority, and influence in the analytic dyad. Psychoanal. Q., 65: 201–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menninger, K. (1958). Theory of Psychoanalytic Technique. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, J. (2000). Psychoanalysis and the moral high ground. Int. J. Psychoanal., 81: 1101–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oremland, J. D. (1991). Interpretation and Interaction: Psychoanalysis or Psychotherapy? Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panel (2011). Play and playfulness. Meeting of Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., June, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 62: 553–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of self-disclosure. Psychoanal. Q., 64: 466–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1998). Getting real in analysis. Psychoanal. Q., 57: 566–593.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (2006). Practical Psychoanalysis for Therapists and Patients. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, S. (1998). Abstinence, anonymity and the avoidance of self-disclosure. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 18: 538–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roustang, F. (1983). Psychoanalysis Never Lets Go, trans. N. Lukacer Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64: 35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnat, J. (2008). Reuniting the psychic couple in analytic training and practice: a candidate’s experience. Psychoanal. Psychol., 25: 110–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shill, M. A. (2004), Analytic neutrality, anonymity, abstinence, and elective self-disclosure. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 52: 151–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk, S. (2004). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Skolnikoff, A. Z. (2004). The quest for a unified theory: a retreat from uncertainty. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 24: 86–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (1997). Creative misreading: why we talk past each other. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 45: 335–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2001). Obstacles to integration: another look at why we talk past each other. Psychoanal. Psychol., 18: 485–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. F. (2007). In search of a theory of therapeutic action. Psychoanal. Q., 76: 1735–1761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolorow, R. D. & Atwood, G. E. (1979). Faces in a Cloud: Subjectivity in Personality Theory. New York: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Sugarman, A. (2006). Mentalization, insightfulness, and therapeutic action: the importance of mental organization. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87: 965–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman, A. (2010). Losing a father all over again: the termination of an analysis of an adolescent boy suffering from father loss. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 58: 667–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman, A. (2011). Psychoanalyzing a Vulcan: the importance of mental organization in treating Asperger’s patients. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 31: 222–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansey, M. J. & Burke, W. F. (1989). Understanding Countertransference: From Projective Identification to Empathy. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. (1986). Forty-Two Lives in Treatment. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar