178
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Desire and Responsibility: the Ethics of Countertransference Experience

Pages 435-476 | Published online: 19 Sep 2017

REFERENCES

  • Aron, L. (2006). Analytic impasse and the third: clinical implications of intersubjectivity theory. Int. J. Psychoanal., 87:349–368.
  • Baranger, M., Baranger, W. & Mom, J. (1983). Process and non-process in analytic work. Int. J. Psychoanal., 64:1–15.
  • Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: an intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanal. Q., 73:5–46.
  • Benjamin, J. (2009). A relational psychoanalysis perspective on the necessity of acknowledging failure in order to restore the facilitating and containing features of the intersubjective relationship (the shared third). Int. J. Psychoanal., 90:441–450.
  • Bion, W. R. (1970). Attention and Interpretation. London: Tavistock.
  • Bloom, H. (1975). Kabbalah and Criticism. New York: Continuum Press.
  • Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 59:550–584.
  • Bollas, C. (1989). Forces of Destiny: Psychoanalysis and Human Idiom. London: Free Association Books.
  • Brenman-Pick, I. (1985). Working-through in the countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 66:157–166.
  • Chused, J. (1996). The therapeutic action of psychoanalysis: abstinence and informative experience. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 44:1047–1071.
  • Cooper, S. H. (2010). A Disturbance in the Field: Essays in Transference-Countertransference Engagement. New York: Routledge.
  • Eagle, M. (2010). From Classical to Contemporary Psychoanalysis: A Critique and Integration. New York: Routledge.
  • Faimberg, H. (1992). The countertransference position and the countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 73:541–547.
  • Feldman, M. (1997). Projective identification: the analyst’s involvement. Int. J. Psychoanal., 78:227–241.
  • Feldman, M. (2007). Racker’s contribution to the understanding of countertransference revisited. Psychoanal. Q., 76:779–793.
  • Ferro, A. (2002). In the Analyst’s Consulting Room, trans. P. Slotkin. New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Gerson, S. (2004). The relational unconscious: a core element of intersubjectivity, thirdness, and clinical process. Psychoanal. Q., 73:63–98.
  • Green, A. (1975). The analyst, symbolization and absence in the analytic setting (on changes in analytic practice and analytic experience)—in memory of D. W. Winnicott. Int. J. Psychoanal., 56:1–22.
  • Greenberg, J. (1995). Psychoanalytic technique and the interactive matrix. Psychoanal. Q., 64:1–22.
  • Heimann, P. (1950). On countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 31:81–84.
  • Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19:389–422.
  • Jacobs, T. J. (1991). The Use of the Self: Countertransference and Communication in the Analytic Setting. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
  • Joseph, B. (1985). Transference: the total situation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 66:447–454.
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  • Kirshner, L. (2011). Neutrality and the ethics of desire. Paper presented at meeting of the Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., January 13, New York.
  • Kirshner, L. (2012). Toward an ethics of psychoanalysis: a critical reading of Lacan’s Ethics. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 60:1223–1242.
  • Lacan, J. (1992). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959–1960, ed. J.-A. Miller, trans. D. Porter. New York: Norton.
  • Lacan, J. (2002a). The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In Ecrits: A Selection, trans. B. Fink. New York: Norton, pp. 3–9.
  • Lacan, J. (2002b). Aggressiveness in psychoanalysis. In Ecrits: A Selection, trans. B. Fink. New York: Norton, pp. 10–30.
  • Leclaire, S. (1998). On the ear with which one ought to listen. In Psychoanalysing: On the Order of the Unconscious and the Practice of the Letter, trans. P. Kamuf. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
  • Lear, J. (2011). A Plea for Irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  • McGuire, W., ed. (1974). Letter from Sigmund Freud to C. G. Jung, June 7, 1909. In The Freud/Jung Letters: The Correspondence Between Sigmund Freud and C. G. Jung. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
  • McLaughlin, J. T. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:595–614.
  • Money-Kyrle, R. E. (1956). Normal countertransference and some of its deviations. Int. J. Psychoanal., 37:360–366.
  • Ogden, T. H. (1994). The analytic third: working intersubjectively with clinical facts. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75:3–19.
  • Ogden, T. H. (1997). Reverie and Interpretation: Sensing Something Human. New York: Jason Aronson.
  • Opatow, B. (1997). The real unconscious: psychoanalysis as a theory of consciousness. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 45:865–890.
  • Pizer, S. (1992). The negotiation of paradox in the analytic process. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 2:215–240.
  • Pontalis, J.-B. (1981). Frontiers in Psychoanalysis: Between Dream and Psychic Pain, trans. C. P. Cullen. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
  • Purcell, S. D. (2004). The analyst’s theory: a third source of countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 85:635–652.
  • Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. J. Econ. Lit., 36:11–46.
  • Racker, H. (1957). The meanings and uses of countertransference. Psychoanal. Q., 26:303–357.
  • Racker, H. (1968). Transference and Countertransference. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
  • Renik, O. (1993a). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 62:553–571.
  • Renik, O. (1993b). Countertransference enactment and the psychoanalytic process. In Psychic Structure and Psychic Change: Essays in Honor of Robert S. Wallerstein, M.D., ed. M. J. Horowitz, O. F. Kernberg & E. M. Weinshel. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 135–158.
  • Ruti, M. (2012). The Singularity of Being: Lacan and the Immortal Within. New York: Fordham Univ. Press.
  • Schafer, R. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.
  • Schafer, R. (2009). The countertransference of feeling frustrated. In Tragic Knots in Psychoanalysis: New Papers on Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
  • Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Smith, H. F. (2000). Countertransference, conflictual listening, and the analytic relationship. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 48:95–128.
  • Spillius, E. (1988). Melanie Klein Today: Developments in Theory and Practice, Vol. 2: Mainly Practice. London: Routledge.
  • Spillius, E. (1992). Clinical experiences of projective identification. In Clinical Lectures on Klein and Bion, ed. R. Anderson. London/New York: Tavistock/Routledge, pp. 59–73.
  • Spillius, E. (2007). Encounters with Melanie Klein: Selected Papers of Elizabeth Spillius. London: Routledge.
  • Spillius, E. & O’Shaughnessy, E. (2012). Projective Identification: The Fate of a Concept. London: Routledge.
  • Steiner, J. (1993). Psychic Retreats: Pathological Organizations in Psychotic, Neurotic, and Borderline Patients. London: Routledge.
  • Steiner, J. (2011). The numbing feeling of reality. Psychoanal. Q., 80:73–90.
  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185:1124–1131.
  • Waelder, R. (1936). The principle of multiple function: observations on over-determination. Psychoanal. Q., 5:45–62.
  • Wilson, M. (2003). The analyst’s desire and the problem of narcissistic resistances. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 51:71–99.
  • Wilson, M. (2006). “Nothing could be further from the truth”: the role of lack in the analytic process. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 54:397–422.
  • Wilson, M. (2010). Putting practice into theory: making the training analyst system coherent. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 58:287–311.
  • Wilson, M. (2012). The flourishing analyst, responsibility, and psychoanalytic ethics: commentary on Kirshner. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 60:1251–1258.
  • Wollheim, R. (1993). Personal communication.
  • Zizek, S. (2007). Lacan: at what point is he Hegelian? Trans. R. Butler & S. Stevens. http://www.lacan.com/zizlacan1.htm.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.