The Context of Correctness: A Comment on RushtonFootnote¹

1 Preparation of this paper was not supported by any grant, foundation, political, or religious organization.

References

• Allen, G. E. (1986). The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, 1910–1940: An essay in institutional history. Osiris, II, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., & Anderson, J. L. (1986). Inside the league. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, E. (1992). The retreat of scientific racism: changing concepts of race in Britain and the United States between the world wars. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellant, R. (1991). Old Nazis, the new right and the Republican Party. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1979). Psychology, racism, and fascism. Binningham: A. F. & R./Searchlight.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, D. P., & Vanderwolf, C. H. (1990). A critique of Rushton on race, brain size, and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 777–784.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1937). The fight for our national intelligence. London: P. S. King.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1987). Beyondism: Religion from science. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Cernovsky, Z. Z., & Litman, L. C. (1993). Re·analysis of Rushton’s crime data. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Degler, C. (1991). In search of human nature. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. (1988). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor, T., & Roberts, J. V. (1990). Rushton on race and crime: The evidence remains unconvincing. Canadian Journal of Criminology,32, 335–343.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. E. (1929). Jews and others: Some group differences in personality, intelligence and college achievement. The Personnel Journal,7, 341–348.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. E. (1961a). The equalitarian dogma. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 4, 480–484.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. E. (1961b). The equalitarian dogma. Mankind Quarterly, 1, 253–257.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. E. (1961c). The scientific racism of Juan Comas. Mankind Quarterly,2, 100–106.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. E. (1962). Racial differences and witch hunting. Science,135, 982–983.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. (1994). Egalitarian fiction and collective fraud. Society,31, 53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, I. L. (1995). The Rushton file: Racial comparisons and media passions. Society, 32, 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kevles, D. J. (1985). In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, R. (1976). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s struggle for equality. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, M. (1995). The race gallery: The return of raciaL·science. London: Johathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Kühl, S. (1994). Eugenics, American racism, and German national socialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, C. (Dec. 1, 1994). The tainted sources of the bell curve. New York Review of Books, 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Linklater, M. (Nov. 23, 1994). Racism and the barmy Laird of Nigg. The Times of London.
   Google Scholar
• Lipstadt, D. (1993). Denying the Holocaust: The growing assault on truth and memory. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, M. (1989). Race differences in sexual behavior: A critique of Rushton and Bogaert’s evolutionary hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality,23, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, R. (1991). Race differences in intelligence: A global perspective. Mankind Quarterly,32, 99–121.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, J. (1995). Race, prejudice, and a Guggenheim Fellow. Mankind Quarterly, 35, 267–285.
   Google Scholar
• Mehler, B. (1983). The new eugenics: Academic racism in the U.S. today. Science for the People, 15, 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mehler, B. (1989). Foundations for fascism: The New Eugenics Movement in the United States. Patterns of Prejudice, 23, 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (Oct. 20, 1994). Professors of hate. Rolling Stone. In R. Jacoby & N. Glauberman (Eds.), The bell curve debate: History, documents, opinions (pp. 162–178). New York: Times Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, F. P. (1985). The Liberty Lobby and the American right: Race, conspiracy, and culture. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. (1965). Editorials: Our new look. Western Destiny, 10(9), 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. (1966a). Eugenics and race. London: Clair Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. (1966b). Blood groups and race (rev. ed.). London: Clair Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. (1991). Race, intelligence, and bias in academe. Washington, D.C.: Scott-Townsend.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. (1995a). The concept of heredity in Western thought: Part two, the myth of biological egalitarianism. Mankind Quarterly, 35, 343–371.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. (1995b). The concept of heredity in Western thought: Part three, the revival of interesting genetics. Mankind Quarterly, 36, 73–103.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1991). Sex differences in human brain size and the general meaning of differences in brain size. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 507–522.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1993). Still no convincing evidence of a relation between brain size and intelligence in humans. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 751–756.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1995a). Does brain size matter? A reply to Rushton and Ankney. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 570–576.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. (1995b). Race differences in brain size: things are not as clear as they seem to be. American Psychologist, 49, 570–576.
   Google Scholar
• Popplestone, J. A., & MacPherson, M. W. (1994). An illustrated history of American psychology.Madison, WI: Wm. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. (1988). Racial hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provine, w. (1973). Geneticists and the biology of race crossing, Science, 182, 790–796.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, C. (1961). Race and reason. Washington, D.C.: Public Mfairs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., Capaldi, E. D., Paris, S. G., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1996). Psychology (4th ed.). MinneapolislSt. Paul: West Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1984). Sociobiology: Toward a theory of individual and group differences in personality and social behavior (with commentaries and authors response). In J. Royce & L. P. Mas (Eds.), Annals of theoretical psychology (VoL 2, pp. 1–81). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. p. (1987). Evolution, altruism and genetic similarity theory. Mankind Quarterly, 27, 379–395.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1988). Race differences in behaviour: A review and evolutionary analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 1009–1024.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1989a). Genetic similarity, human altruism, and group selection (with commentaries and author's response. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 503–559.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1989b). Invited review: The evolution of racial differences: a response to M. Lynn. Journal of Research in PersonaLity, 23, 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1991). Do r-K strategies underlie human race differences? A reply to Weizmann et aJ. Canadian Psychology, 32, 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1992). Contributions to the history of psychology: XC. Evolutionary biology and heritable traits (with reference to Oriental-White-Blackdifferences): The 1989 AAAS paper. Psychological Reporls, 71, 811–821.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1994a). Editorial: The equalitarian dogma revisited. Intelligence, 19, 263–280.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1994b). Sex and race differences in cranial capacity from international labour office data Intelligence, 19, 281–294.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1994c). Victim of a scientific hoax. Society, 31, 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1995a). Race, evolution, and behavior: A life history perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1995b). Race and crime: An international dilemma. Society, 32, 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1996). Political correctness and the study of racial differences. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P., & Osborne, R. T. (1995). Genetic and environmental contributions to cranial capacity in Black and White adolescents. Intelligence, 20, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P., Littlefield, C. H., & Lumsden, C. J. (1986). Gene-culture coevolution of complex social behavior: Human altruism and mate choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 83, 7340–7343.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P., Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, p. A. (1984). Genetic similarity theory: Beyond kin selection. Behavior Genetics, 14, 179–193.
   Google Scholar
• Samelson, F. (1974). On the science and politics of the IQ. Social Research, 41, 467–488.
   Google Scholar
• Samelson, F. (1992). Rescuing the reputation of Sir Cyril Burt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28, 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Samelson, F. (June 1995). Updating the Burt affair. Paper presented at the XXVII Annual Meeting of CHEIRON, the International Society for History of the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Bowdoin, Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Sautman, B. (1995). Theories of East Asian superiority. In R. Jacoby & N. GIauberman (Eds.), The bell curve debate: History, documents, opinions (pp. 201–220). New York: Times Books
   Google Scholar
• Simonds, C. S. (Sept 10, 1971). The strange story of Willis Carto. National Review, 978–989.
   Google Scholar
• Snyderman, M., & Rothman, S. (1988). The IQ controversy, the media, and public policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal, M. (1987). PsychoLogical testing and American society, l890–1930. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, W. H. (1994). The science and politics of racial research. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, P. W. (May 28, 1978). The fascist specter behind the world anti-red league. Washington Post, pp. C1, C2.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. (1988). German eugenics between science and politics. Osiris, 5, 260–282.
   Google Scholar
• Weizmann, F., Weiner, N. I., Wiesenthal, D. L., & Ziegler, M. (1990). Differential K theory and racial hierarchies. Canadian Psychology, 31, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Weizmann, F., Weiner, N. 1., Wiesenthai, D. L., & Ziegler, M. (1991). Eggs, eggplants, and eggheads: A rejoinder to Rushton. Canadian Psychology, 32, 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, A. S. (1996). “As his name indicates...”: R. S. Woodworth’s letters of reference and employment for Jewish psychologists in the 1930s. Journal for the History ofthe Behavioral Sciences, 32, 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M. (1990). Some dubious premises in research and theory on racial differences. American Psychologist, 45, 1297–1303.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., & Brody, N. (1988). Oysters, rabbits, and people. A critique of “Race Differences in Behavior” by J. P. Rushton. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 1025–1033.
   Google Scholar