58
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cultural Issues in the Intellectual Assessment of Children from Diverse Cultural Backgrounds

, &
Pages 113-127 | Published online: 07 Jul 2016

References

  • American Psychological Association (1993). Guidelines for providers of psychological services to ethnic, linguistic, and culturally different backgrounds. American Psychologist, 28(1), 45–48.
  • Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Intellectual assessment of children from culturally different backgrounds. School Psychology Review, 12(4), 552–565.
  • Baca, L., & Cervantes, H. T. (1984). Parent and community involvement in bilingual special education. In L. M. Baca and H. Y. Cervantes (Eds.), The bilingual special education interface (pp. 213–233). St. Louis, MO: Times Mirror/Mosby.
  • Banks, J. (1986). Multicultural education: development, paradigms, and goals. In J. A. Banks and J. Lynch (Eds.), Multicultural education in Western societies (pp. 2–28). New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Brandt, E. A. (1984). The cognitive functioning of American Indian children: A critique of McShane and Plas. School Psychology Review, 13(1), 74–82.
  • Ceci, S. J. (1990). On intelligence . . .more or less: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Chamberlain, P., & Medeiros-Landurand, P. (1991). Practical considerations for the assessment of LEP students with special needs. In E. Hamayan and J. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students. Austin, TX: Pro.Ed.
  • Cohen, R. J., Montague, P., Nathanson, L. S., & Swerdik, M. E. (1988). Psychological testing: An introduction to test and measurement. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
  • Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 18–36.
  • Damico, J. (1991). Descriptive assessment of communicative ability in limited English proficient students. In E. Hamayan and J. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students (pp. 157–217). Austin, TX: Pro.Ed.
  • Dana, R. (1995). Culturally competent MMPI assessment of Hispanic populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 17, 305–319.
  • Dana, R. H. (1995). Impact of the use of standard psychological assessment on diagnosis and treatment of ethnic minorities. In J. F. Aponte, R. Y. Rivers, and J. Wohl (Eds.), Psychological interventions and cultural diversity (pp. 57–73). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Dana, R. H. (1987). Training for professional psychology: Science practice, and identity. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 9–16.
  • Dana, R. H. (1984). Intelligence testing of American Indian children: Sidesteps in quest of ethical practice. White Cloud Journal, 3(3), 35–43.
  • Feir, R. (1992). Reforming Pennsylvania’s Funding Mechanism and Program ~.ules for Special Education. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Education Finance Association, New Orleans.
  • Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & Miranda, A. H. (1995). Best practices in working with culturally different families. In A. Thomas and J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 1049–1060). Washington, D.C.: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Flaugher, R. L. (1978). The many definitions of test bias. American Psychologist, 33,671–679.
  • Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1994). The language-minority student and special education: Issues, trends, and paradoxes. Exceptional Children, 60, 310–322.
  • Gopaul-McNicol, S. (1993). Working with West Indian families. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Gopaul-McNicol, S. (in press). A multicultural, multimodal, multisystems approach in working with culturally different families. Connecticut: Praeger, Greenwood Publishers.
  • Hale-Benson, J. (1986). Black children: Their roots, culture, and learning styles (rev. ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hillard, A. (1987). The learning potential assessment device and instrumental enrichment as a paradigm shift. Negro Educational Review, 38, 200–208.
  • Holtzman, W. H., Jr., & Wilkinson, C. Y. (1991). Assessment of cognitive ability. In E. Hamayan and J. Damico (Eds.), Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual students (pp. 247–280). Austin, TX: Pro.Ed.
  • Horn, J. L. (1991). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: A review of theory. In K. S. McGrew, J. K. Werder, and R. W. Woodcock (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson technical manual (pp. 197–232). Chicago: Riverside.
  • Huang, L. N., & Ying, Y. (1989). Chinese American children and adolescents. In J. T. Gibbs, L. N. Huang, and Associates, Children of color. Psychological inteIVentions with minority youth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Jacob-Tim, S., & Hartshorne, T. (1991). Ethics and law for school psychologists. Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing Company.
  • Joe, J. R., & Malach, R. S. (1995). Families with Native American roots. In E. W. Lynch and M. J. Hanson (Eds.), Developing cross-cultural competence-A guide for working with young children and their families (pp. 89–119). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
  • Kozulin, A., & Falik, L. (1995). Dynamic cognitive assessment of the child. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 192–196.
  • Leighton, A. (1982). Relevant generic issues. In A. Gaw (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychiatry. Little, MA: Wright-PSG.
  • Lopez, E., Lamar, D., & Scully-Demartini, D. (in press). The cognitive assessment of limited English proficient children: Current problems and practical recommendations. Journal of Cultural Diversity and Mental Health.
  • Merrel, K. W. (1990). Differentiating low achievement students and students with learning disabilities: An examination of performances on the Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational battery. Journal of Special Education, 24, 296–305.
  • McGoldrick, P., Pearce, J. K., & Giordano, J. (1982). Ethnicity and family therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Miller-Jones, D. (1989). Culture and testing. American Psychologist, 44(2), 360–366.
  • Miller, N. (1984b). Some observations concerning formal tests in cross-cultural settings. In N. Miller (Ed.), Bilingual and language disability: Assessment and remediation (pp. 104–114). San Diego: College Hill Press.
  • Morrow, R. D. (1987). Cultural differences-beware. Academic Therapy, 23(2), 143–149.
  • National Association of School Psychologists (1984). Professional conduct manual. Stratford, CT: NASP.
  • Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51(2), 77–101.
  • Nuttall, E., DeLeon, B., & Valle, M. (1990). Best practices in considering cultural factors. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in" school psychology (pp. 219–233). Washington, DC: The National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Oakland, T. D. (1982). Nonbiased assessment in counseling: issues and guidelines. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 15(1), 107–116.
  • Obiakor, F. (1992). Embracing new special education strategies for African-American students. Exceptional Children, 59(2), 104–106.
  • Ogbu, J. (1987). Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18, 312–336.
  • Okagaki, L., & Sternberg, J. R. (1993). Parental belief and children’s school performance. Child Development, 64, 36–56.
  • Parrish, T., & Montgomery, D. (1995). The politics of special education finance reform in three stages. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute for Research, Center for Special Education Finance.
  • Persell, C. H. (1977). Education and inequality: The root and results ofstratification in America’s schools. New York: The Free Press.
  • Prediger, D. J. (1993). Multicultural assessment standards: A compilation for counselors. Alexandria, VA: Association for Assessment in Counseling.
  • Reschly, D. (1988). Minority representation and special education reform. Exceptional Children, 54, 316–323.
  • Rosenbaum, J. E. (1980). Social implications of educational grouping. Review of Research in Education, 8, 361–401.
  • Serpell, R. (1979). How specific are perceptual skills: A cross-cultural study of pattern reproduction. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 365–380.
  • Shinn, M., Tindal, G., & Stein, S. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement and the identification of mildly handicapped students: A research review. Professional School Psychology, 3(1), 69–85.
  • Schubert, J., & Cropley, A. J. (1972). Verbal regulation of behavior and 1.0 in Canadian Indian and white children. Developmental Psychology, 7, 295–301.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1987). A review of research on elementary ability grouping. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Snowden, L., & Todman, P. (1982). The psychological assessment of Blacks: New and needed developments. In E. E. Jones, & S. J. Korchin (Eds.), Minority Mental Health (pp. 193–226). New York: Praeger.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sue, D. W. (1981). Counseling the cultural different: Theory and practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Thomas, T. N. (1992). Psychoeducational adjustment of English-speaking Caribbean and central American immigrant children in the United States. School Psychology Review, 21(4), 566–576.
  • Thomas, T. N. (1995). Cultural in the Assessment of Hispanic Children. Paper presented at the 66th Eastern Psychological Annual Conference, Boston.
  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1990 (110th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1995). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1995. Washington DC.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1994). To assure a free appropriate public education to all children with disabilities: Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC.
  • Westby, C. E., & Ford, V. (1993). The role of team culture in assessment and intervention. Journal of Education and Psychological Consultation, 4(4), 319–320.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.