73
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Recruiting Future Science and Mathematics Teachers Into Alternative Certification Programs: Strategies Tried and Lessons Learned

, , , , , & show all
Pages 165-183 | Published online: 01 Mar 2017

References

  • Abell, S. K., Volkmann, M. J., Arbaugh, F., Lannin, J., & Boone, W. (2003, January). Serving many masters: Designing a postbaccalaureate program for the recruitment and retention of science and mathematics teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, St. Louis, MO.
  • Darling-HammondL.Teaching and knowledge: Policy issues posed by alternate certification of teachersPeabody Journal of Education19926712315410.1080/01619569009538694
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hudson, L., & Kirby, S. N. (1989). Redesigning teacher education: Opening the door for new recruits to science and mathematics teaching. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  • Darling-HammondL.YoungsP.Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us?Educational Researcher20023191325
  • DentonJ. J.MorrisJ. E.Recruitment and selection of mathematics and science teaching candidates for an alternative teacher certification programAction in Teacher Education19911321019
  • Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (1999). Missouri standards for teacher education programs (MoSTEP). Retrieved September 1, 2005, from http://www.dese.state.mo.us/divteachqual/teached/standards.htm
  • Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2001). Innovative and alternative professional education programs (5 CSR 80-805.030). Retrieved September 1, 2005, from http://www.dese.state.mo.us/schoollaw/rulesregs/80805030.html
  • Feistritzer, C. E. (1990). Profile of teachers in the U.S.—1990. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Information.
  • Feistritzer, C. E. (1992). Who wants to teach? Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Information.
  • Feistritzer, C. E. (1999). Teacher quality and alternative certification programs. Testimony before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, May 13, 1999. Retrieved September 1, 2005, from http://www.ncei.com/Testimony051399.htm.
  • Gallup Organization (The). (1994). Gallup/SRI teacher perceiver up-dated research. Lincoln, NE: Author.
  • Hough, D. (2000). Teacher supply and demand in Missouri, 1999–2000. Springfield: Southwest Missouri State University.
  • Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (2003). The art of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacher-researchers (Rev. ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • IngersollR. M.The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schoolsEducational Researcher1999282263710.2307/1177187
  • Natriello, G., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Challenges to an alternative route for teacher education. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The 91st yearbook of the Society for the Study of Education (Part I, pp. 59–78). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Olson, L. (2000, January 12). Finding and keeping competent teachers. Quality Counts 2000: Who should teach? (Special Report). Education Week. Retrieved September 1, 2005, from http://www.edweek.org
  • PenickJ.Alternative certification: The curse, the challenge, and the opportunityAssociation for the Education of Teachers of Science Newsletter200136212
  • Piburn, M. D., & Baker, D. R. (2000). Teacher education for Arizona mathematics and science. TEAMS 1996–2000: A summative evaluation. Tempe: Arizona State University.
  • ReysB. J.ReysR. E.Recruiting mathematics teachers: Strategies to considerMathematics Teacher2004979295
  • ShenJ.Has the alternative certification policy materialized its promise? A comparison between traditionally and alternatively certified teachers inPUBLIC schoolsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis19971927628310.2307/1164466
  • ShenJ.The impact of alternative certification on the elementary and secondaryPUBLIC teaching forceJournal of Research and Development in Education199832916
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.
  • WallweyD.Tool time: Education's most wanted listGallup Educator2000584

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.