The Teacher Research Update Experience: Perceptions of Practicing Science, Mathematics, and Technology Teachers

References

• BarnesM. B.CrewsP.CurryR.SimmsJ.Exploring the unknown–togetherENC Focus2002914445
   Google Scholar
• BasistaB.MathewsS.Integrated science and mathematics professional development programsSchool Science and Mathematics200210235937110.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18219.x
   Google Scholar
• Basista, B., Tomlin, J., Pennington, K., & Pugh, D. (2001). Inquiry-based integrated science and mathematics professional development program. Education, 121, 615–715.
   Google Scholar
• BellB.GilbertJ.Teacher development: A model from science education1996LondonFalmer Press
   Google Scholar
• BranscombL. M. Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and GovernmentThe federal government in the reform of K-12 math and science educationScience, technology, and government for a changing world1993New YorkCarnegie Corporation4951
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• BybeeR. W.Loucks-HorsleyS.Advancing technology education: The role of professional developmentThe Technology Teacher20006023135
   Google Scholar
• Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2002). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill /Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• ColburnA.Constructivism: Science education's grand unifying theory.”The Clearing House2000a74912
   Google Scholar
• Colburn, A. (2000b). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, March, 42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Biology Teacher Inservice Programs. (1996). The role of scientists in the professional development of science teachers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Education and Human Resources. (1994). Investing in our future (Report of the Federal Coordinating Committee for Science, Education, and Technology on education and human resources). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• CrossJ. L.Teacher research update experience: 1998–1999 summative evaluation1999GainesvilleUniversity of Florida
   Google Scholar
• CrossJ. L.Teacher research update experience: 1999–2000 formative evaluation2000GainesvilleUniversity of Florida
   Google Scholar
• Dass, P. J. (1999, March). Evaluation of a district-wide inservice professional development program for science teachers: Challenges faced and lessons learned. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444839).
   Google Scholar
• DriverR.OldhamV.A constructivist approach to curriculum development in scienceStudies in Science Education198613105122
   Google Scholar
• FriedmanD. L.Science, YES! Constructing a love for teaching scienceThe Clearing House199972269274
   Google Scholar
• GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S.What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachersAmerican Educational Research Journal200138915946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoldY.RothR.The transformational helping professional: A new vision1999BostonAllyn and Bacon
   Google Scholar
• GordonL. S.Listening to teachersENC Focus2002915758
   Google Scholar
• GreenwaldA. W.BanajiM. R.Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology1995102427
   Google Scholar
• HoganK.BerkowitzA. R.Teachers as inquiry learnersJournal of Science Teacher Education20001112510.1023/A:1009468730080
   Google Scholar
• IrvingM. M.DicksonL. A.Jr.KeyserJ.RetrainingPUBLIC secondary science teachers by upgrading their content knowledge and pedagogical skillsThe Journal of Negro Education19996840941810.2307/2668111
   Google Scholar
• KahleJ. B.BooneW.Strategies to improve student science learning: Implications for science teacher educationJournal of Science Teacher Education2000119310710.1023/A:1009432007059
   Google Scholar
• Kays, J. (1999). TRUE teachers. Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Precollegiate Education and Testing (CPET).
   Google Scholar
• Keyser, J. O. (1996). Teaching portfolios for middle school science teachers: A staff development tool for effecting and documenting transfer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
   Google Scholar
• KeyserJ. O.Enhancing chemistry instruction for middle schoolersJournal of Staff Development1997841619
   Google Scholar
• Kielborn, T. L., & Gilmer, P. J. (Eds.). (1999). Meaningful science: Teachers doing inquiry + teaching science. Tallahassee, FL: SERVE.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., III, & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Layman, J. W. (1996). Inquiry and learning: Realizing science standards in the classroom. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
   Google Scholar
• LiebermanA.MillerL.Teachers transforming their world and their work1999New YorkTeachers College Press
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, E. C. (1926). The meaning of adult education. New York: New Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., & Hewson, P. (1996). Principles of effective professional development for mathematics and science education: A synthesis of standards. Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• MagoldaP.Border crossings: Collaboration struggles in educationThe Journal of Educational Research20019434635810.1080/00220670109598772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MilesM. B.HubermanM. A.Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook19942Thousand Oaks, CASage
   Google Scholar
• Mundry, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1999). Designing professional development for science and mathematics teachers: Decision points and dilemmas. NISE Brief, 3(1). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430810)
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Improving Science Education. (1993). Profiling teacher development programs: An approach to formative evaluation. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National science education standards1996Washington, DCNational Academy Press
   Google Scholar
• Newell, S. T. (1993). Practical inquiry as a tool for creating change in teachers' conceptions of effective teaching (conceptual change). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. (1998). The pursuit of a dream: Education can be improved. In J. J. Mintzes, J. Wandersee, & J. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 3–29). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'LoughlinM.Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learningJournal of Research in Science Teaching19922979182010.1002/tea.3660290805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pankratius, W. J., & Snow, M. B. (1991). Science teachers in Nevada: State of the professional, Spring 1990. Carson City: Nevada State Department of Education, Planning, Research, and Evaluation Branch. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED301472).
   Google Scholar
• RobertsJ. K.HensonR. K.TharpB. Z.MorenoN. P.An examination of the change in teacher self-efficacy beliefs in science education based on the duration of inservice activitiesJournal of Science Teacher Education20011219921310.1023/A:1016708016311
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. (1958). Eros and education. San Juan: University of Puerto Rico, Faculty of General Studies.
   Google Scholar
• SpradleyJ.The ethnographic interview1979New YorkHolt, Rinehart, and Winston
   Google Scholar
• Stohr-HuntP. M.An analysis of frequency of hands-on experience and science achievementJournal of Research in Science Teaching19963310110910.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<101::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van ZeeE. H.Preparing teachers as research in courses on methods of teaching scienceJournal of Research in Science Teaching19983579180910.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199809)35:7<791::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van ZeeE. H.RobertsD.Using pedagogical inquiries as a basis for learning to teach: Prospective teachers' reflection upon positive science learning experiencesScience Education20018573375710.1002/sce.1036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZechLGause-VegaC.BrayM.SeculesTGoldmanS.Content-based collaborative inquiry: A professional development model for sustaining educational reformEducational Psychologist200035207217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar