References
- Bangert-DrownsRLKulikCLCKulikJAMorganMTThe instructional effect of feedback in test-like eventsReview of Educational Research19916121323810.3102/00346543061002213
- BellPHoadleyCLinnMLinnMDavisEBellPDesign-based research in educationInternet environments for science education2004Mahwah, NJErlbaum7388
- BellPLinnMCScientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIEInternational Journal of Science Education20002279781710.1080/095006900412284
- BerlandLKReiserBJMaking sense of argumentation and explanationScience Education2009931265510.1002/sce.20286
- BlackPWiliamDAssessment and classroom learningAssessment in Education19985177410.1080/0969595980050102
- BlackPWiliamDThe formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learningYearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education2004103205010.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00047.x
- BloxhamSWestAUnderstanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students’ conceptions of assessmentAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education200429672173310.1080/0260293042000227254
- Brakel OlsonVLThe revising process of sixth-grade writers with and without feedbackJournal of Educational Research199084222910.1080/00220671.1990.10885987
- BrookhartSHow to give effective feedback to your students2008Alexandria, VAAssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development
- BrownALDesign experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settingsThe Journal of the Learning Sciences1992214117810.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
- BrownALCampioneJCCommunities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other nameHuman Development199021108125
- ButlerDLWinnePHFeedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesisReview of Educational Research19956524528110.3102/00346543065003245
- CalkinsLMLiving between the lines1991Portsmouth, NHHeinemann
- CalkinsLMThe art of teaching writing19942Portsmouth, NHHeinemann
- CazdenCClassroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning2001Portsmouth, NHHeinemann
- ChoKChungTRKingWRSchunnCDPeer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: An empirical investigationCommunications of the ACM200851838810.1145/1325555.1325571
- ChoKMacArthurCStudent revision with peer and expert reviewingLearning and Instruction20102032833810.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
- ChoKSchunnCDScaffolded writing and reviewing in the disciplineComputers & Education20074840942610.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
- CoburnCERethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting changeEducational researcher200332631210.3102/0013189X032006003
- CollinsAScanlonEO’SheaTToward a Design Science of EducationNew directions in educational technology1992New YorkSpringer1522
- CrooksTJThe impact of classroom evaluation on studentsReview of Educational Research19885843810.3102/00346543058004438
- CrowhurstMWriting workshop: An experience in peer response to writingLanguage Arts197956757762
- Darling-HammondLStrengthening the teaching profession: Teacher learning that supports student learningEducational Leadership1998555611
- DeciERyanRThe “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviorPsychological Inquiry20001122726810.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
- EdwardsDMercerNCommon knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom1987LondonMethuen
- FrederiksenJRWhiteBYCognitive facilitation: A method for promoting reflective collaborationProceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning1997TorontoUniversity of Toronto5362
- GeeJSocial linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses1990LondonFalmer Press
- GravesDWriting: Teachers and children at work1983Portsmouth, NHHeinemann
- GravesDA fresh look at writing1994Portsmouth, NHHeinemann
- HattieJTimperleyHThe power of feedbackReview of Educational Research2007778111210.3102/003465430298487
- HerrenkohlLRGuerraMRParticipant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth gradeCognition and Instruction199816443147310.1207/s1532690xci1604_3
- HerrenkohlLRTaskerTWhiteBPedagogical practices to support classroom cultures of scientific inquiryCognition and Instruction201029114510.1080/07370008.2011.534309
- HoadleyCStahlGCreating context: Design-based research in creating and understanding CSCLComputer support for collaborative learning 20022002Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates453462
- HoadleyCLinnMCLearning through online peer discussions in the science classroomInternational Journal of Science Education20002283985710.1080/095006900412301
- HovardasTTsivitanidouOEZachariaZCPeer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school studentsComputers & Education20147113315210.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019
- KimMHannafinMScaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: A qualitative case studyInstructional Science20113925528210.1007/s11251-010-9127-4
- KimMHannafinMBryanLTechnology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practiceScience Education2007961010103010.1002/sce.20219
- KlugerANDeNisiAThe effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theoryPsychological Bulletin1996119225428410.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
- KrajcikJMunKLedermanNorman GAbellSandra KPromises and challenges of using learning technologies to promote student learning of scienceHandbook of research on science education2014Mahwah, NJErlbaum
- KulhavyRWStockWAFeedback in written instruction: The place of response certitudeEducational Psychology Review1989127930810.1007/BF01320096
- LeinhardtGSteeleMDSeeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialoguesCognition and Instruction2005238716310.1207/s1532690xci2301_4
- LemkeJLTalking science: Language, learning, and values1990Norwood, NJAblex
- LermanSCultural discursive psychology: A socio-cultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematicsEducational Studies in Mathematics2002468711310.1023/A:1014031004832
- LiLLiuXSteckelbergALAssessor or assesse: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedbackBritish Journal of Educational Technology201041352553610.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x
- LinnMDesigning the knowledge integration environmentInternational Journal of Science Education20002278179610.1080/095006900412275
- LinnMCClarkDSlottaJDWISE design for knowledge integrationScience Education20038751753810.1002/sce.10086
- LinnMCHsiSComputers, teachers and peers: Science learning partners2000Mahwah, NJErlbaum
- LinnMCSlottaJDWISE scienceEducational Leadership20005822932
- LiuNCarlessDPeer feedback: The learning element of peer assessmentTeaching in Higher Education200611327929010.1080/13562510600680582
- LiuEZLinSSChiuCHYuanSMWeb-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewerIEEE Transactions on Education200144324625110.1109/13.940995
- LuJLawNOnline peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedbackInstructional Science20114025727510.1007/s11251-011-9177-2
- Lui, M., Cober, R., & Slotta, J. (2012). EvoRoom & HelioRoom: Designing learning experiences for collective inquiry. Paper presented in workshop onEducational Interfaces, Software, and Technology at CHI 2012, Austin, TX.
- LuiMSlottaJImmersive simulations for smart classrooms: Exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary scienceTechnology, Pedagogy and Education201423578010.1080/1475939X.2013.838452
- Lui, M., & Slotta, J. (2014b). Collective immersive simulations: A new approach to learning and instruction of complex biology topics. In ICLS 2014 proceedings.
- McNeillKLElementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation and evidence and abilities to construct arguments over the school yearJournal of Research in Science Teaching20114879382310.1002/tea.20430
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education, 2nd ed. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Nasir, N. (2006). But when is an identity: Challenges and tensions in operationalizing identity in studies of learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the international society for cultural and activity research, Seville, Spain.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). Science teachers learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. Committee on Strengthening Science Education through a Teacher Learning Continuum. Board on Science Education and Teacher Advisory Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Next generation science standards: For states, by states2013Washington, DCThe National Academies Press
- O’ConnorKWorthamSRymesBCommunicative practice, cultural production, and situated learning: Constructing and contesting identities of expertise in a heterogeneous learning contextThe linguistic anthropology of education2003Westport, CTPraeger
- PaulusTMThe effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writingJournal of Second Language Writing1993826528910.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
- PenuelWRFishmanBJHaugan ChengBSabelliNOrganizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and designEducational Researcher201140733133710.3102/0013189X11421826
- Peters, V. L., & Slotta, J. D. (2010). Scaffolding knowledge communities in the classroom: New opportunities in the Web 2.0 era. In M. J. Jacobson, P. Reimann (Eds.), Designs for learning environments of the future: International perspectives from the learning sciences (pp. 205–232). New York: Springer.
- RamaprasadAOn the definition of feedbackBehavioral Science19832841310.1002/bs.3830280103
- RogoffBWertschJVRioPDAlvarezAObserving sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeshipSociocultural studies of mind1995CambridgeCambridge University Press139164
- RogoffBParadiseRArauzRCorrea-ChavezMAngelilloCFirsthand learning through intent participationAnnual Review of Psychology20035417520310.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145118
- RowntreeDAssessing students: How shall we know them?1987LondonKogan Page
- SadlerDRFormative assessment and the design of instructional systemsInstructional Science198918211914410.1007/BF00117714
- SadlerDRFormative assessment and the design of instructional strategiesInstructional Science19981811914410.1007/BF00117714
- SearbyMEwersTAn evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the School of Music, Kingston UniversityAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education19972237138310.1080/0260293970220402
- Seidman, I. (Ed.). (1998). Technique isn’t everything, but it is a lot. In Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (pp. 63–78). New York: Teachers College Press.
- ShavelsonRJTowneLScientific research in education2002Washington, DCNational Academy Press
- Slotta, J. D. (2007). Supporting collaborative inquiry: New architectures, new opportunities. In J. Gobert (Ed.), Fostering peer collaboration with technology. Symposium conducted at the biennial Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference, New Brunswick, NJ.
- Slotta, J. (2010). Evolving the classrooms of the future: The interplay of pedagogy, technology and community. In K. Makitalo-Siegl, J. Zottmann, F. Kaplan, & F. Fischer (Eds.), Classroom of the future: Orchestrating collaborative spaces (pp. 215–242). Rotterdam: Sense.
- Slotta, J. D., & Najafi, H. (2012). Supporting collaborative knowledge construction with web 2.0 Technologies. In C. Mouza, & N. Lavigne (Eds.), Emerging technologies for the classroom: A learning sciences perspective. New York: Springer.
- ToppingKPeer assessment between students in colleges and universitiesReview of Educational Research19986824827610.3102/00346543068003249
- ToppingKPeer assisted learning: A practical guide for teachers and parents2000LondonNew York, Cassell
- ToppingKJEhlySWPeer assisted learning: A framework for consultationJournal of Educational and Psychological Consultation20011211313210.1207/S1532768XJEPC1202_03
- TorranceHPryorJInvestigating formative assessment1998BuckinghamOpen University Press
- TorranceHPryorJDeveloping formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theoryBritish Educational Research Journal20012761563110.1080/01411920120095780
- TsivitanidouOEZachariaZCHovardasAHigh school students’ unmediated potential to assess peers: unstructured and reciprocal peer assessment of web portfolios in a science courseLearning and Instruction20112150651910.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.08.002
- TsivitanidouOEZachariaZCHovardasANicolaouAPeer assessment among secondary school students: introducing a peer feedback tool in the context of a computer supported inquiry learning environment in scienceJournal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching201231433465
- LehnKAChiMTHBaggettWMurrayRCProgress report: Towards a theory of learning during tutoring1995Pittsburgh, PALearning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh
- WhiteBYFrederiksenJRInquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all studentsCognition and Instruction199816311810.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
- XiaoYLuckingRThe impact of two types of peer assessment on students’ performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environmentInternet and Higher Education20081118619310.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005