References
- AlaviHDillenbourgPKaplanFCressUDimitrovaVSpechtMDistributed awareness for classroom orchestrationLearning in the synergy of multiple disciplines2009BerlinSpringer211225
- AndersonJRCorbettATKoedingerKRPelletierRCognitive tutors: Lessons learnedJournal of the Learning Sciences1995416720710.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
- BerlandLKReiserBJClassroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentationScience Education201195219121610.1002/sce.20420
- DavisEPetishDSmitheyJChallenges new science teachers faceReview of Educational Research20067660765110.3102/00346543076004607
- diSessaAASawyerKA history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault linesCambridge handbook of the learning sciences2006CambridgeCambridge University Press265281
- FurtakEMSeidelTIversonHBriggsDCExperimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysisReview of Educational Research20128230032910.3102/0034654312457206
- Gerard, L. F., & Linn, M. C. (2015). How do you design automated guidance for students’ writing in inquiry science? In K. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto & K. Hahl (Eds.), Science education research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future. Proceedings of the 11th biannual conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA). Helsinki, Finland.
- Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Examining the impacts of annotation and automated guidance on essay revision and science learning. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS). National Institute of Education, Singapore.
- GerardLMatukCMcElhaneyKLinnMCAutomated, adaptive guidance for K-12 educationEducational Research Review201515415810.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.001
- GerardLRyooKMcElhaneyKLiuLRafertyALinnMCAutomated guidance for student inquiryJournal of Educational Psychology20161081608110.1037/edu0000052
- HagemansMGMeijHJongTThe effects of a concept map-based support tool on simulation-based inquiry learningJournal of Educational Psychology2013105112410.1037/a0029433
- HerrenkohlLRTaskerTWhiteBYDeveloping classroom cultures of inquiry and reflection using Web of InquiryCognition and Instruction201129114410.1080/07370008.2011.534309
- HoweCTolmieAGroup work in primary school science: Discussion, consensus and guidance from expertsInternational Journal of Educational Research200339517210.1016/S0883-0355(03)00073-9
- HoweCTolmieADuchak-TannerVRattrayCHypothesis testing in science: Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledgeLearning & Instruction20001036139110.1016/S0959-4752(00)00004-9
- KoedingerKMcLaughlinEAHeffernanNA quasi-experimental evaluation of an on-line formative assessment and tutoring systemJournal of Educational Computing Research20104348951010.2190/EC.43.4.d
- LeinhardtGSteeleMSeeing the complexity of standing to the side: Instructional dialoguesCognition & Instruction2005238716310.1207/s1532690xci2301_4
- LinnMCEylonB-SScience learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration2011New YorkRoutledge
- LinnMCPalmerEBarangerAGerardLStoneEImproving undergraduate research experiences: What works?Science20153476227627633
- LiuOLBrewCBlackmoreJGerardLFMadhokJLinnMCAutomated scoring of constructed response science Items: Prospects and obstaclesEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice201433192810.1111/emip.12028
- LiuOLLeeH-SHofstetterCLinnMCAssessing knowledge integration in science: Construct, measures and evidenceEducational Assessment200813335510.1080/10627190801968224
- LiuOLLeeHSLinnMCMeasuring knowledge integration: Validation of four-year assessmentsJournal of Research in Science Teaching2011481079110710.1002/tea.20441
- LiuOLRiosJHeilmanMGerardLFLinnMCValidation of automated scores of science assessmentsJournal of Research in Science Teaching20165321523310.1002/tea.21299
- MilitelloMSchweidJSireciSFormative assessment systems: Evaluating the fit between school districts ‘needs and assessment systems’ characteristicsEducational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability201022295210.1007/s11092-010-9090-2
- A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas2012Washington, DCNational Academy Press
- RoschelleJDimitriadisYHoppeUClassroom orchestration: SynthesisComputers & Education20136952352610.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.010
- RoscoeRDMcNamaraDSWriting Pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroomJournal of Educational Psychology201310541010102510.1037/a0032340
- RothKGarnierHChenCLemmensMSchwilleKWicklerNVideo-based lesson analysis: Effective science professional development for teacher and student learningJournal of Research in Science Teaching20114811714810.1002/tea.20408
- Ruiz-PrimoMAFurtakEMExploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiryJournal of Research in Science Teaching200744578410.1002/tea.20163
- SchroederCMScottTPTolsonHHuangT-YLeeY-HA meta-analysis of national research: Effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United StatesJournal of Research in Science Teaching2007441436146010.1002/tea.20212
- SharplesMShared orchestration within and beyond the classroomComputers & Education20136950450610.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.014
- ShepardLThe role of assessment in a learning cultureEducational Researcher200029741410.3102/0013189X029007004
- SherinMvan EsEEffects of video club participation on teachers’ professional visionJournal of Teacher Education2009601203710.1177/0022487108328155
- Sisk-HiltonSTeaching and learning inPUBLIC: Professional development through shared inquiry2009Columbia, NYTeachers College Press
- TalenquerVTomanekDNovodvorskyIAssessing students’ understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice?Journal of Research in Science Teaching20135018920810.1002/tea.21074
- TissenbaumMLuiMSlottaJDCo-designing collaborative smart classroom curriculum for secondary school scienceJournal of Universal Computer Science2011183327352
- EsEASherinMGLearning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactionsJournal of Technology and Teacher Education2002104571596
- WichmannALeutnerDInquiry learning: Multilevel support with respect to inquiry, explanations, and regulation during an inquiry cycleZeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie200923211712710.1024/1010-0652.23.2.117