References
- Atkin, J. M. (2001, April). How science teachers improve their formative assessment practices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
- BarabSALuehmannALBuilding sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptationScience Education20038745446710.1002/sce.10083
- Ben-PeretzMThe teacher-curriculum encounter1990AlbanyState University of New York Press
- Benton, L., & Johnson, H. (2014). Structured approaches to participatory design for children: Can targeting the needs of children with autism provide benefits for a broader child population? Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9297-y
- BeyerHHoltzblattKContextual design: Defining customer-centered systems1998San FranciscoMorgan Kaufmann
- BeyerHHoltzblattKContextual designInteractions199961324210.1145/291224.291229
- BiestaGJEducation, accountability, and the ethical demand: Can the democratic potential of accountability be regained?Educational Theory20045423325010.1111/j.0013-2004.2004.00017.x
- Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. In Learning lives: Learning, identity, and agency in the life course. Working paper 5. Exeter: The Learning Lives project.
- BingimlasKABarriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literatureEurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education20095235245
- Björndal, P., Rissanen, M. J., & Murphy, S. (2011). Lessons learned from using personas and scenarios for requirements specification of next-generation industrial robots. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design, user experience, and usability (DUXU) (LNCS 2011; 6769), Orlando, FL, pp. 378–387. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21675-6_44
- BlackPWiliamDKappan classic: Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment formative assessment is an essential component of classroom work and can raise student achievementPhi Delta Kappan2010921819010.1177/003172171009200119
- BlumenfeldPFishmanBJKrajcikJMarxRWSolowayECreating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schoolsEducational Psychologist20003514916410.1207/S15326985EP3503_2
- BødkerSThe AT-Project: practical research in cooperative designDAIMI Report Series19932245412810.7146/dpb.v22i454.6772
- BødkerSScenarios in user-centred design—Setting the stage for reflection and actionInteracting with computers2000131617510.1016/S0953-5438(00)00024-2
- BolingEThe need for design cases: Disseminating design knowledgeInternational Journal of Designs for Learning20101118
- BoschmanFMcKenneySVoogtJUnderstanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approachesEducational Technology Research and Development20146239341610.1007/s11423-014-9341-x
- Bowers, J., & Pycock, J. (1994). Talking through design: Requirements and resistance in cooperative prototyping. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 299–305). New York: ACM.
- Brandt, E. (2006). Designing exploratory design games: A framework for participation in participatory design? In Proceedings of the ninth conference on participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design, (Vol. 1, pp. 57–66). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1147261.1147271
- CarrAAUser-design in the creation of human learning systemsEducational Technology Research and Development199745352210.1007/BF02299726
- CarrollJMScenario-based design1995New YorkWiley
- CarrollJMFive reasons for scenario-based designInteracting with Computers2000131436010.1016/S0953-5438(00)00023-0
- CharterisJSmardonDTeacher agency and dialogic feedback: Using classroom data for practitioner inquiryTeaching and Teacher Education20155011412310.1016/j.tate.2015.05.006
- ClaeysCLowyckJPerreGInnovating education through the use of new technologies: Reflections from the field (Part 1)Education Media International199734314415210.1080/0952398970340308
- CoberRTanESlottaJSoHJKöningsKDTeachers as participatory designers: Two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environmentsInstructional Science201543220322810.1007/s11251-014-9339-0
- Cohn, M. (2004). User stories applied: For agile software development. Writing (Vol. 1, p. 268). Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.
- Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: What can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9292-3
- Crabtree, A. (2004). Design in the absence of practice: Breaching experiments. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 59–68). New York: ACM.
- Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., & Mariani, J. (2003). Informing the development of calendar systems for domestic use. In ECSCW 2003 (pp. 119–138). Amsterdam: Springer.
- da Silva, T. S., Martin, A., Maurer, F., & Silveira, M. (2011). User-centered design and agile methods: A systematic review. In 2011 AGILE conference. IEEE. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6005488
- EdelsonDCDesign research: What we learn when we engage in designThe Journal of the Learning Sciences200211110512110.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4
- EhnPAdlerPSWinogradTAScandinavian design: On participation and skillUsability: Turning technologies into tools1992New YorkOxford University Press96132
- EhnPKyngMGreenbaumJKyngMCardboard computers: Mocking-it-up or hands-on the futureDesign at work: Cooperative design of computer systems1991Hillsdale, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates169195
- FriedmanBHuman values and the design of computer technology1996New YorkCambridge University Press
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P., & Borning, A. (2003). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. Unpublished manuscript, Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
- GaverWWBoucherAPenningtonSWalkerBCultural probes and the value of uncertaintyInteractions2004115535610.1145/1015530.1015555
- Gaver, W., & Dunne, A. (1999). Projected realities: Conceptual design for cultural effect. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 600–607). New York: ACM.
- GaverBDunneTPacentiEDesign: Cultural probesInteractions199961212910.1145/291224.291235
- GerardLFSpitulnikMLinnMCTeacher use of evidence to customize inquiry science instructionJournal of Research in Science Teaching2010471037106310.1002/tea.20367
- GiorgiAAn application of phenomenological method in psychologyDuquesne Studies in Phenomenological Psychology197528210310.5840/dspp197529
- GordenVSBiemanJMRapid prototyping: Lessons learnedSoftware, IEEE1995121859510.1109/52.363162
- GrønbækKKyngMMogensenPKyngMMathiassenLToward a cooperative experimental system development approachComputers and design in context1997Cambridge, MAThe MIT Press201238
- HoogveldAWMPaasFJochemsWMGvan MerriënboerJJGExploring teachers’ instructional design practices: Implications for improving teacher trainingInstructional Science20023029130510.1023/A:1016081812908
- KaliYMcKenneySSagyOTeachers as designers of technology enhanced learningInstructional Science20154317317910.1007/s11251-014-9343-4
- KensingFBlombergJParticipatory design: Issues and concernsComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)1998716718510.1023/A:1008689307411
- KirschnerPAMerriënboerJJGDo learners really know best? Urban legends in educationEducational Psychologist20134816918310.1080/00461520.2013.804395
- KöningsKDSeidelTMerriënboerJJParticipatory design of learning environments: Integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designersInstructional Science2013421910.1007/s11251-013-9305-2
- LawsonBSchemata, gambits and precedent: Some factors in design expertiseDesign Studies20042544345710.1016/j.destud.2004.05.001
- LearyHSeveranceSPenuelWRQuigleyDSumnerTDevaulHDesigning a deeply digital science curriculum: Supporting teacher learning and implementation with organizing technologiesJournal of Science Teacher Education2016
- LidzCSEDynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential1987New YorkGuilford Press
- LimY-KStoltermanETenenbergJThe anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideasACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction TOCHI20081527
- LinnMEylonB-SScience learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration2011New YorkRoutledge
- LippertSKFormanHUtilization of information technology: Examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behaviorIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management200552336338110.1109/TEM.2005.851273
- Luff, P., Jirotka, M., Heath, C., & Greatbatch, D. (1993). Tasks and social interaction: The relevance of naturalistic analyses of conduct for requirements engineering. In Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, pp. 187–190. IEEE.
- Macaulay, L. (1993). Requirements capture as a cooperative activity. In Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, pp. 174–181. San Diego, CA.
- Matuk, C. F., & King Chen, J. (2011). The WISE Idea Manager: A tool to scaffold the collaborative construction of evidence-based explanations from dynamic scientific visualizations. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning CSCL2011: Connecting computer supported collaborative learning to policy and practice, July 4–8, 2011. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
- Matuk, C. F., McElhaney, K., King Chen, J., Miller, D., Lim-Breitbart, J., & Linn, M. C. (2012). The idea manager: A tool to scaffold students in documenting, sorting, and distinguishing ideas during science inquiry. In ICLS’12: Proceedings of the 10th international conference for the learning sciences. Sydney, Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Matuk, C. F., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Technology integration to scaffold and assess students use of visual evidence in science inquiry. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meeting (AERA2013): Education and poverty: Theory, research, policy and praxis, San Francisco, CA.
- Matuk, C., & Linn, M. C. (2014). Exploring a digital tool for exchanging ideas during science inquiry. In ICLS’14: Proceedings of the 11th international conference for the learning sciences. Boulder: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- MatukCLinnMCEylonB-STechnology to support teachers using evidence from student work to customize technology-enhanced inquiry unitsInstructional Science20154322925710.1007/s11251-014-9338-1
- McElhaney, K., Miller, D., Matuk, C., & Linn, M. C. (2012). Using the Idea Manager to promote coherent understanding of inquiry investigations. In ICLS’12: Proceedings of the 10th international conference for the learning sciences, Sydney. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- MeansBPenuelWRCrawfordVMKorbakCLewisAMurphyRFet al.GLOBE Year 6 evaluation: Explaining variation in implementation2001Menlo Park, CASRI International
- MeansBPenuelWRPadillaCThe connected school: Technology and learning in high school2001San Francisco, CAJossey-Bass
- MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJQualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook20143Thousand Oaks, CASAGEPUBLICations
- MogensenPHTowards a prototyping approach in systems developmentScandinavian Journal of Information Systems199243153
- MullerMJWildmanDMWhiteETaxonomy of participatory design practices: A brief practitioner’s guideCommunications of the ACM19933642628
- Nielsen, L. (2004). Engaging personas and narrative scenarios. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen.
- OwstonRContextual factors that sustain innovative pedagogical practice using technology: An international studyJournal of Educational Change20078617710.1007/s10833-006-9006-6
- OxmanREPrecedents in design: A computational model for the organization of precedent knowledgeDesign Studies199412214115710.1016/0142-694X(94)90021-3
- PenuelWRFishmanBJChengBHSabelliNOrganizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and designEducational Researcher20114033133710.3102/0013189X11421826
- PenuelWRRoschelleJShechtmanNDesigning formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design processResearch and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning20072517410.1142/S1793206807000300
- Peters, V. L., & Slotta, J. D. (2009). Co-designing curricula to promote collaborative knowledge construction in secondary school science. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (Vol. 1, pp. 204–213). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- PreeceJRogersYSharpHInteraction design: Beyond human–computer interaction20154New YorkWiley
- Rafferty, A., Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2014). Promoting student learning through automated formative guidance for chemistry drawings. Paper presented at the international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS), Boulder, CO.
- ReiserBJSpillaneJPSteinmullerFSorsaDCarneyKKyzaEFishmanBO’Connor-DivelbissSInvestigating the mutual adaptation process in teachers’ design of technology-infused curriculaFourth international conference of the learning sciences2000Mahwah, NJErlbaum342349
- RheinfrankJJHartmanWRWassermanADesign for usability: Crafting a strategy for the design of a new generation of Xerox copiers1992UsabilityTurning technologies into tools1540
- RoschelleJDimitriadisYHoppeUClassroom orchestration: synthesisComputers & Education20136952352610.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.010
- Roschelle, J., & Penuel, W. R. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences (pp. 606–612). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- SafferDDesigning for interaction: Creating innovative applications and devices20102Thousand Oaks, CANew Riders Press
- SchönDAThe reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action1983New YorkBasic Books
- SchulerDNamiokaAParticipatory design: Principles and practices1993Hillsdale, NJLawrence Erlbaum
- Shrader, G., Williams, K., Lachance-Whitcomb, J., Finn, L. E., & Gomez, L. (2001). Participatory design of science curricula: The case for research for practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Seattle, WA.
- SlottaJDLinnMCWISE science: Web-based inquiry in the classroom2009New YorkTeachers College Press
- SmithKMProducing the rigorous design caseInternational Journal of Designs for Learning201011920
- SnyderCPaper prototyping: The fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces2003San Francisco, CAMorgan Kauffman
- SolowayEGuzdialMHayKELearner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st centuryInteractions199412364810.1145/174809.174813
- SuwaMGeroJPurcellTUnexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design processDesign Studies20002153956710.1016/S0142-694X(99)00034-4
- SuwaMTverskyBWhat do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysisDesign Studies19971838540310.1016/S0142-694X(97)00008-2
- Suwa, M., Tversky, B., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2001). Regrouping parts of an external representation as a source of insight. In Proceedings of the third international conference on cognitive science (pp. 692–696). Beijing: Press of USTC.
- Szekely, P. (1994). User interface prototyping: Tools and techniques. In Software engineering and human–computer interaction (pp. 76–92). Berlin: Springer.
- TriggRHBødkerSGrønbækKOpen-ended interaction in cooperative prototyping: A video-based analysisScandinavian Journal of Information Systems199136386
- TrippSDBichelmeyerBRapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategyEducational Technology Research and Development1990381314410.1007/BF02298246
- ZertucheAGerardLLinnMCHow do openers contribute to student learningInternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education2012517992