Acceptability of the female condom in Zimbabwe: Positive but male-centred responses

References

• HIV & AIDS Surveillance Report. Annual Report Ministry of Health and Child Welfare: Zimbabwe, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• HIV & AIDS Surveillance Quarterly Report. (Oct–Dec. 1993). Ministry of Health and Child Welfare, Zimbabwe. A sentinel survey is a study among random samples of well-defined and accessible groups, e.g. antenatal clinic attenders or all hospital patients, to get an idea of the rate of infection in the wider population.
   Google Scholar
• Mahomed K., Kasule J., Makuyana D, et al. 1991. Seroprevalence of HIV infection amongst antenatal women in greater Harare, Zimbabwe. Central African Journal of Medicine. 37: 322–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mbizvo M.T., Ray S., Bassett M, et al. 1994. Condom use and the risk of HIV infection: who is being protected?. Central African Journal of Medicine. 40(11): 294–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A situation analysis of the family planning programme. Zimbabwe National Family Planning Council & The Population Council’s Africa OR/TA Project, March. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Perez I.M. 1989. HIV/AIDS prevention in Africa: Support Programme, Zimbabwe. Consultant Report. John Hopkins University. Institute for International Programmes 20 November.
   Google Scholar
• Williams G. and Ray S. 1993. Work against AIDS: workplace based AIDS initiatives in Zimbabwe. Strategies for Hope Series 8: AIDS Action UK and AMREF Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• Drew L.W, Blair M., Miner R.C, et al. 1990. Evaluation of the virus permeability of a new condom for women. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 17(April-June.): 110–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M.J. Davidson A.J., Chen J.-H, et al. 1992. Barrier contraceptives and sexually transmitted diseases in women: a comparison of female dependent methods and condoms. American Journal of Public Health. 2(5): 669–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper M.A. and Conrardy M. 1989. Preliminary evaluation of Reality, a condom for women to wear. Advances in Contraception. 5: 229–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soper D.E., Brockwell N.J., Dalton H.P. 1991. Evaluation of the effects of a female condom on the female lower genital tract. Contraception. 44(1): 21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trussell J., Sturgen K., Strickler J, et al. 1994. Comparative contraceptive efficacy of the female condom and other barrier methods. Family Planning Perspectives. 26(2).
   Google Scholar
• Bounds W. 1988. A female condom (Femidom): A study of its user acceptability. British Journal of Family Planning. 14: 83–87.
   Google Scholar
• Bounds W. 1992. Female condom (Femidom). A clinical study of its use-effectiveness and patient acceptability. British Journal of Family Planning. 18: 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jivasak-Apimas S. Acceptability of the vaginal sheath (Fernshield) in Thai couples. Contraception. 44: 183–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakondhavat C. 1990. The female condom (letter). American Journal of Public Health. 80: 498.
   Google Scholar
• Monny-Lobe, Tchupo P.J., Turk T, et al, 1991. Acceptability of the female condom among a highrisk population in Cameroon. Family Health International. November.
   Google Scholar
• Shervington D.O. 1993. The acceptability of the female condom among low-income African-American women. Journal of the National Medical Association. 85(5): 341–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HIV/AIDS Surveillance Quarterly Report. Oct–Dec 1994. Ministry of Health & Child Welfare, Zimbabwe.
   Google Scholar
• Berkley S., Naamara W, et al, 1990. AIDS & HIV infection in Uganda: are more women infected than men?. AIDS. 4(12): 1237–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgdorff M. Epidemiology of HIV-1 infection in Mwanza region, Tanzania. Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• HIV/AIDS Information Needs. : Assessment 1993–1994. Women and AIDS Support Network. (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Both the sex workers and the urban women who came to the second follow up had similar, but overall more favourable responses (data not shown). It is difficult to say whether this is because they had more practice with the condoms or because of a selection bias among those who had made the effort to come for the second follow up.
   Google Scholar
• Ray S and Gumbo N. Attitudes towards vaginal drying agents among male factory workers in Harare, Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe AIDS Prevention Project. (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Gollub E. and Stein A.Z. 1993. The new female condom — item 1 on a women’s AIDS prevention agenda. American Journal of Public Health. 83(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runganga A., Pitts M., and McMaster J. 1992. The use of herbal and other agents to enhance sexual experience. Social Science & Medicine. 35(8): 1037–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J.E., Ayowa O.B., and Brown R.C. 1993. Dry and tight: sexual practices and potential AIDS risk in Zaire. Social Science & Medicine. 37(8): 989–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richters J. 1994. Researching condoms: the laboratory and the bedroom. Reproductive Health Matters. 3(May.): 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson A.M. 1994. Condoms and HIV transmission. New England Journal of Medicine. 331(6): 391–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padian N. 1988. Prostitute women and AIDS: epidemiology. AIDS. 2(62): 413–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar