Risks and rights: The uses of reproductive health data

References

• S Abdul A'la Maududi. Purdah and the Status of Women in Islam. Lahore (first published in 1939 in Urdu and translated into English in 1972). 9th edition, Islamic Publications. 1987; 121. Maududi, an internationally recognised scholar of Islam, was the head of the right-wing, fundamentalist political party in Pakistan, the Jamaat-e-Islami.
   Google Scholar
• M. Luther. The Estate of Marriage. revised edition, The Christian in Society II. Vol 45: 1552; Muhlenberg Press: Philadelphia, 1962; 46.
   Google Scholar
• L. Gordon. Woman's Body, Woman's Right. revised edition, 1990; Penguin Books: New York, 1990 A. McLaren. Reproductive Rituals. 1984; Penguin Books: New York.
   Google Scholar
• S.M. Gifford. The meaning of lumps: a case study of the ambiguities of risk. C.R. James, R. Stall, S.M. Gifford. Anthropology and Epidemiology: Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Health and Disease. 1986; D Reidel: Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Cook. Human Rights in Relation to Women's Health. 1993; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• For example. An-Na'im Abdullahi Ahmed. Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law. 1990; Syracuse University Press: New York R. Thandabantu Nhalapo. International protection of human rights and the family: African variations on a common theme. International Journal of Law and the Family. 3: 1989; 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• C. AbouZahr, E. Royston. Maternal Mortality: A Global Factbook. 1991; World Health Organization: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• R.W. Rochat, A. Starrs. Preventing the Tragedy of Maternal Deaths: A Report on the International Safe Motherhood Conference. Nairobi, February 1987, 1987 1987; World Bank: Washington DC, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Vital Statistics of the United States 9988. 1991; US Department of Health and Human Services: Hyattsville.
   Google Scholar
• R.C. Carriere. Why the other half dies-maternal mortality in Bangladesh. Statement at the First International Conference on Obstetrics and Gynecology. 11 December. 1992; UNICEF: Dhaka.
   Google Scholar
• D. Nortman. Parental Age as a Factor in Pregnancy Outcomes. Reports on Population/Family Planning No 16. 1974; Population Council: New York.
   Google Scholar
• M. Koenig. Maternal mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh: 1976–1985. Studies in Family Planning. 19(2): 1988; 69–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hobcraft, J. McDonald, S. Rutstein. Child spacing effects on infant and early childhood mortality. Population Index. 49(4): 1983; 585–618.
   Google Scholar
• E. Royston, S. Armstrong. Preventing Maternal Deaths. 1985; World Health Organization: Geneva, 187.
   Google Scholar
• A. Rosenfield, D. Maine. Maternal mortality: a neglected tragedy-Where is the ‘M’ in ‘MCH’?. Lancet. 2: 1985; 83–85. (July 15).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.A. Harrison. Predicting trends in operative delivery for cephalopelvic disproportion in Africa. Lancet. 335: 1990; 861–862. (April 7).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Harlap, K. Kost, J.D. Forrest. Preventing Pregnancy, Protecting Health: A New Look at Birth Control Choices in the United States. 1991; Alan Guttmacher Institute: New York, 95.
   Google Scholar
• D. Maine. Safe Motherhood: Options and Issues. 1991; Center for Population and Family Health: New York.
   Google Scholar
• F.M. Coeytaux. Induced abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa: what we do and do not know. Studies in Family Planning. 19(3): 1988; 186–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasongo Project Team M. Koenig. Maternal mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh: 1976–1985. Studies in Family Planning. 19(2): 1988; 77. The reason is that increased use of contraceptives ‘led to a shift in the pattern of childbearing away from one high-risk group (older, high parity women) but toward another subgroup with equivalent or even higher mortality risks (younger, nulliparous women).’.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antenatal screening for fetopelvic dystocias: a cost-effectiveness approach to the choice of simple indicators for use by auxiliary personnel. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 87(4): 1984; 173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Greenwood. A prospective study of the outcome of pregnancy in a rural area of the Gambia. Bulletin of WHO. 65(5): 1987; 635–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Loudon. On maternal and infant mortality 1900–1960. Social History of Medicine. 4(1): 1991; 29–73. This fact was further demonstrated by a study of maternal mortality in a religious community in the United States whose members do not make use of modern medical care, even in emergencies. This community is prosperous, and its members are well educated and well fed. Yet, in 1982 alone, there were 872 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in this community. This is about 100 times higher than the level of maternal mortality in the US population as a whole, and even higher than the current level cited for Bangladesh. See [7].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Beral. Reproductive mortality. British Medical Journal. 2: 1979; 632–634. Interestingly, no more recent data have been published on this issue, to our knowledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Fortney. Reproductive mortality in two developing countries. American Journal of Public Health. 76: 1986; 134–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.P. Sachs, P.M. Layde, G.L. Rubin. Reproductive mortality in the United States. JAMA. 247: 1982; 2789–2792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Stein, D. Maine. The health of women. International Journal of Epidemiology. 15(3): 1986; 303–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Allman. Fertility and family planning in Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning. 22(5): 1991; 308–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Germain, R. Dixon-Mueller. Whose life is it, anyway? Assessing the relative risks of contraception and pregnancy. Four Essays on Birth Control Needs and Risks. 1993; International Women's Health Coalition: New York.
   Google Scholar
• J.A. Eg. Gupta. ‘People like you never agree to get it’: visit to an Indian family planning clinic. Reproductive Health Matters. 1: 1993; 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• D. Gwatkin. Political will and family planning: the implications of India's emergency experience. Population and Development Review. 5(29): 1979
   Google Scholar
• See. B. Mintzes, A. Hardon, J. Hanhart. Norplant: Under Her Skin. 1993; Women's Health Action Foundation and WEMOS: Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• R. Sabatier. Blaming Others: Prejudice, Race, and Worldwide AIDS. 1988; Panos Institute: Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• The combination of blame and neglect is not confined to HIV/AIDS, or even STD regulation more generally. Wendy Chavkin has pointed out that there are relatively few drug treatment programmes in the US that will accept pregnant women. Yet rather than ensure that such women can get treatment, women are often demeaned and penalised for the potential harm to which they may be exposing the fetus, and in some instances are even imprisoned to prevent further drug use. See. W Chavkin. Drug addiction and pregnancy: policy crossroads. American Journal of Public Health. 80(4): 1990; 483–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Fee, N. Krieger. Understanding AIDS: historical interpretations and the limits of biomedical individualism. American Journal of Public Health. 83(10): 1993; 1477–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Ferenic. Effectiveness and coverage of sex-work interventions in developing countries. AIDS Health Promotion Exchange. 1: 1992; 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• C.J. Elias, L. Heise. The Development of Microbicides: A New Method of HIV Prevention for Women. Working Paper No 6. 1993; Population Council: New York, 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• R. Bayer, A. Fairchild-Carrino. AIDS and the limits of control: public health orders, quarantine, and recalcitrant behavior. American Journal of Public Health. 83(10): 1993; 1471–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.L. Dalton. AIDS and the Law: A Guide for the Public. 1987; Yale University Press: New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• M. de Bruyn. Women and AIDS in developing countries. Social Science and Medicine. 34(3): 1992; 249–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Study Group on Heterosexual Transmission of HIV Comparison of female to male and male to female transmission of HIV in 563 stable couples. British Medical Journal. 304: 1992; 809–813.
   Google Scholar
• Article 16, Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women. UN Doc. A/RES/34/180. 18 December 1979
   Google Scholar
• S. Coliver. The Right to Know: Human Rights and Access to Reproductive Health information. 1995; Article 19 and University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Cook. International protection of women's reproductive rights. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 24: 1992; 647–727.
   Google Scholar
• R. Dixon-Mueller. Population Policy and Women's Rights. 1993; Praeger: Westport.
   Google Scholar
• S.W. Sinding, J. Ross, A. Rosenfield. Seeking common ground: unmet need and demographic goals. International Family Planning Perspectives. 20(1): 1993; 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• R. Dixon-Mueller, A. Germain. Stalking the elusive unmet need. Studies in Family Planning. 23(5): 1993; 330–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Greenhalgh, J. Li. Engendering reproductive policy and practice in peasant China: for a feminist demography. Signs. 20(3): 1995; 601–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ross, M. Rich, J. Molzan. Management Strategies for Family Planning Programs. 1989; Center for Population and Family Health, Columbia University New York. and the sources cited therein.
   Google Scholar
• R.J. Lapham, W.P. Mauldin. Contraceptive prevalence: the influence of organized family planning. Studies in Family Planning. 16(3): 1985; 117–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.P. Freedman. Reflections on emerging frameworks of health and human rights. Health and Human Rights. 1(4): 1995; 315–348.
   Google Scholar