Democratization, decentralization, and local environmental policy capacity: Hungary and Mexico

References

• Bartus, G. (1997). Personal interview.
   Google Scholar
• N.Ben-Elia Introduction Policy Studies Journal 21 1993 74 81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, A. (1994). Systemic change and local government in Hungary. Budapest: Institute for Political Science of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Border Environment Cooperation Commission (BECC). (1998). Home-page for the BECC. On-line at http://www.cocef.interjuarez.com.
   Google Scholar
• Commission for Environmental Cooperation. (1999). North American agenda for action, 1999–2001. Montreal: CEC.
   Google Scholar
• CDLR, S. C. o. L. a. R. A. (1994). Structure and operation of local and regional democracy: Situation in 1993. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, A. (1995). From democratic centralism to local democracy. In A. Coulson (Ed.), Local government in Eastern Europe (pp. 1–22). Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, K. (1995). Local government in Hungary. In A. Coulson (Ed.), Local government in Eastern Europe (pp. 57–75). Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Devas, N. (1995). Local government finance in Hungary: Issues and dilemmas. In A. Coulson (Ed.), Local government in Eastern Europe (pp. 214–237). Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Foltanyi, Z. (1997). Personal interview.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation, T. N. F. (1996a). NGO news: A regional newsletter for non-governmental organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 4–6).
   Google Scholar
• Foundation, T. N. F. (1996b). NGO news: A regional newsletter for non-governmental organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1–5).
   Google Scholar
• Hajdu, Z. (1993). Local government reform in Hungary. In R. J. Bennett (Ed.), Local government in the new Europe (pp. 209–224). London: Belhaven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, G. (1990). Political participation in Hungary. In Strathclyde papers on government & politics (Vol. 76). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Janicke, M., & Weidner, H. (1997). National environmental policies: A comparative study of capacity building. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ley general del equilibrio ecologico y la proteccion al ambiente. (1997). Mexico, DF: Editorial Porrua, Decimoquarto Edicion.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, S. (2000). Problematica ambiental de los municipios Sonorenses. Hermosillo, Son.: Red Fronteriza de Salud y Medio Ambiente, A.C., May.
   Google Scholar
• Mumme, S. P. (2000). Sustainable development and environmental decentralization on the border: Some insights from Sonora. In L. Herzog (Ed.), Shared space: Rethinking the U.S.–Mexico border environment (pp. 101–128). La Jolla: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1998a). Environmental performance reviews: Mexico. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1998b). Decentralization and local infrastructure in Mexico: A new policy for development. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2000). Environmental performance reviews: Hungary. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• J.O’TooleJ.Laurence Local public administrative challenges in post-socialist Hungary International Review of Administrative Sciences 60 1994 291 304
   Google Scholar
• Pàl, T. (1997). Personal interview.
   Google Scholar
• Pineda, N. (2001). Water supply performance, policy and politics in the Mexican border. Unpublished manuscript. Hermosillo, Son.: El Colegio de Sonora.
   Google Scholar
• K.Raustiala The participatory revolution in international environmental law Harvard Environmental Law Review 21 1997 537 575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Review of the Economic Situation in Mexico (RESM). (2001). Reforming the state (Vol. 77, pp. 307–310).
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, V. E. (1997). Decentralization in Mexico. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales, y Pesca. (2000). Programa de Trabajo 2000. Mexico, DF: SEMARNAP [now SEMARNAT]. On-line at http://www.semarnap.gob.mx/programa2000/documento/capitulo3b.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding, M. (2000). Addressing border environmental problems now and in the future: Border XXI and related efforts. In P. Ganster (Ed.), The U.S.–Mexican border environment (pp. 105–138). San Diego: SCERP Monograph No. 1, Southwest Center for Environmental Policy and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Szirmai, V. (1998). Personal interview.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1996). U.S.–Mexico Border XXI framework document. Washington, DC: USEPA 160-R-96-003, October.
   Google Scholar
• Vari, A. (1996). State-of-the-art in public participation in Hungary: The case of siting a spent fuel storage facility. Environmental pollution-ICEP.3, conference proceedings (Vol. 2). European Centre for Pollution Research.
   Google Scholar
• Vari, A. (1998). Personal interview.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2000). World development report 1999–2000. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar

Further reading