Unethical ethics? Reflections on intercultural research practices

References

• Albertina Castro Cáceres, then director of the institution JATH’A.
   Google Scholar
• Andean strategy to reduce the impact of unsafe abortion on women’s health and wellbeing. 1998–2000; Population Council: Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• The project ‘Action-research on sexual and reproductive health with women in rural areas’ (1999–2000) is a component of the ‘Andean strateg’.
   Google Scholar
• Mestizo, a term used in Iberian and Latin American contexts to indicate mixed race, ethnicity or culture (in this setting, Aymara/Hispanic).
   Google Scholar
• CIOMS/OMS. Pautas Éticas Internacionales para la Investigación y Experimentación Biomédica en Seres Humanos. 1993; CIOMS/OMS: Geneva, 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• R. Layton. The work of national bioethics committees in Australia: a history. Reproductive Health Matters. 1(2): 1993; 94–97.
   Google Scholar
• X. Albó. Iguales aunque Diferentes. (our translation). 1999; Ministry of Education/UNICEF/CIPCA: La Paz, 84. ‘Intercultural’ is defined as ‘taking place or forming a communication between cultures, belonging to or derived from different cultures’ (OED). This concept ‘refers above all to the attitudes and relations of individuals or human groups of one culture with reference to another cultural group, its members or features and cultural products’.
   Google Scholar
• J. Lal. Situating locations: the politics of self, identity and ’other’ in living and writing the text. D.L. Wolf. Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. 1996; Westview Press: Boulder CO, 185–186.
   Google Scholar
• Gringa (f) or gringo (m) is a term of uncertain origin which in some Latin American countries, including Bolivia, is used to refer to white Northerners, often assumed to be from the USA. It can bear connotations varying from ironic humour through distancing otherness to anti-imperialist contempt.
   Google Scholar
• The National Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Health, founded in 1999, is a Ministry of Health-led umbrella organisation coordinating all State, non-governmental and international initiatives in the field of sexual and reproductive health.
   Google Scholar
• X. Albó. Iguales aunque Diferentes. 1999; Ministry of Education/UNICEF/CIPCA: La Paz, 149.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The Informed Consent Form must include information regarding the following: (…) - Risks to the subject, including physical, social and emotional. (…) Discomforts and risks: describe any attendant discomforts and risks to be expected.’ Population Council Ethical Review procedures pp 4, 11.
   Google Scholar
• C.M. Renzetti, R.M. Lee. Researching Sensitive Topics. 1993; Sage Publications: Newbury Park CA, 18.
   Google Scholar
• Fieldnotes, Mónica Serrate, 15 July 1999.
   Google Scholar
• C. Fluehr-Lobban. Informed consent in anthropological research: we are not exempt. Human Organization. 53(1): 1994; 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Brewster-Smith. 16.]. Intellectual, legal, and philosophical issues regarding use of social resources and human participants in social science research. Symposium: Ethical Issues in Social Science Research. 1976; University of Minnesota. Presented at.
   Google Scholar
• D. Patai. US academics and Third World Women: is ethical research ossible?. S.B. Gluck, D. Patai. Women’s Words. The Feminist Practice of Oral History. 1991; Routledge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• R. Castro, M.N. Bronfman. Algunos problemas no resueltos en la integración de métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos en la investigación social en salud. Cocoyóc, Mexico: IV Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales y Medicina. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Fieldnotes, Mónica Serrate, 15 May 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Fieldnotes, Monica Serrate, 12 December 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Fieldnotes, Mery Castro, 14 January 2000.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Doctorita’, diminutive form (affectionate, infantilising or demeaning) of ‘doctora’, a female doctor.
   Google Scholar
• T.T. Minh-ha. Difference: ‘A special Third World women issue’. Feminist Review. 25: 1987; 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• X. Albó. Iguales aunque Diferentes. 1999; Ministry of Education/UNICEF/CIPCA: La Paz, 139–140.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia Salinas proposed this concept in a personal communication with Susanna Rance, July 1999: ‘An act that is itself based on ethical principles can end up being almost “unethical”.
   Google Scholar
• B. Ehrenreich, D. English. For Her Own Good. 150 Years of the Experts’ Advice to Women. 1978; Doubleday: New York.
   Google Scholar
• D. Patai. US academics and Third World Women: is ethical research ossible?. S.B. Gluck, D. Patai. Women’s Words. The Feminist Practice of Oral History. 1991; Routledge: New York, 150.
   Google Scholar
• R. Horwitz. Just stories of ethnographic authority. C. Brettell. When TheyRead What We Write: The Politics of Ethnography. 1993; Bergin and Garvey: Westport, 137–138.
   Google Scholar
• C. Mohanty. Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review. 30: 1988; 61–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Parpart. Who is the ‘other’? A postmodern feminist critique of the theory and practice of women and development. Development and Change. 4(3): 1994; 439–464.
   Google Scholar