Publication Cover
Reproductive Health Matters
An international journal on sexual and reproductive health and rights
Volume 10, 2002 - Issue 20: Health sector reforms
2,335
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Role of Oversight in the Health Sector: The Example of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in India

Pages 82-94 | Published online: 09 Nov 2002

References

  • G. Bloom. Equity in health in unequal societies: meeting health needs in contexts of social change. Health Policy. 57(3): 2001; 205–224.
  • D.R. Watkins. The need for equity-oriented health sector reforms. International Journal of Epidemiology. 30: 2001; 720–723.
  • M. Whitehead, G. Dahlgren, T. Evans. Equity and health sector reforms: can low-income countries escape the medical poverty trap. Lancet. 358(9284): 2001; 833–836.
  • H. Standing. Gender and equity in health sector reform programmes: a review. Health Policy and Planning. 12: 1997; 1–18.
  • A. Langer, G. Nigenda, J. Catino. Health sector reform and reproductive health in Latin America and the Caribbean: strengthening the links. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 78(5): 2000; 667–676.
  • World Health Organization. World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: WHO, 2000. p. 4
  • R.B. Saltman, O. Ferrousier-Davis. The concept of stewardship in health policy. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 78(6): 2000; 732–739.
  • Code of Hammurabi. King LW, translator (1910). In: The Avalon Project at Yale Law School, 1996. Available from: http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/hamframe.htm. Accessed 8 July 2002
  • M.I. Roemer. National Health Systems of the World. 1991; Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Indian Law Institute. Legal Framework for Health Care in India: Experience & Future Directions. New Delhi: Butterworth Publishing, 2001
  • Bhore J, Amesur RA, Banerjee AC. Report of the Health Survey and Development Committee. Vol. I. New Delhi: Government of India, 1946
  • R. Bhat. Regulating the private health care sector: the case of the Indian Consumer Protection Act. Health Policy and Planning. 11(3): 1996; 265–279.
  • Misra B, Kalra P. A Study on the Regulatory Framework for Consumer Redress in the Healthcare System in India. New Delhi: Voluntary Organisation in Interest of Consumer Education. 2000. Available from: http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/SAR/India/HealthESW/AR/DocLib. nsf/Table%20Of%20Contents%20Web?OpenView & ExpandView. Accessed 8 July 2002
  • P. Varkey, P.P. Balakrishna, J.H. Prasad. The reality of unsafe abortion in a rural community in South India. Reproductive Health Matters. 8(16): 2000; 83–91.
  • Gopalan S, Shiva M, editors. National Profile on Women, Health and Development: Country Profile – India. New Delhi: Voluntary Health Association of India and World Health Organization, 2000
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The National Population Policy 2000. New Delhi: Government of India, 2000
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Health Policy 2002. Available from: http://mohfw.nic.in/np2002.htm. Accessed 30 May 2002
  • D.H. Peters, A. Yazbeck, R. Sharma. Better Health Systems for India’s Poor: Analysis, Findings, and Options. 2002; World Bank: Washington, DC.
  • International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey Summary, India 1998-99. Bombay: IIPS 2000
  • Wagstaff A. Measuring equity in health care financing: reflections on and alternatives to the WHO’s fairness financing index. 2001. Available from: http://www.healthsystemsrc.org. Accessed 21 March 2002
  • C. AbouZahr. Measuring maternal mortality: what do we need to know?. M. Berer, T.K.S. Ravindran. Safe Motherhood Initiatives: Critical Issues. 2000; Reproductive Health Matters: London.
  • K. Hill, C. AbouZhar, T. Wardlaw. Estimates of maternal mortality for 1995. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 79(3): 2001; 182–193.
  • A. Jain. Implications for evaluating the impact of family planning programs with a reproductive health orientation. Studies in Family Planning. 32(3): 2001; 220–229.
  • R. Sadana. Measuring reproductive health: review of community-based approaches to assessing morbidity. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 78(5): 2000; 640–654.
  • H. Zurayk, H. Khattab, N. Younis. Concepts and measures of reproductive morbidity. Health Transition Review. 3(1): 1993; 17–40.
  • O. Campbell. Measuring progress in safe motherhood programmes: uses and limitations of health outcome indicators. M. Berer, T.K.S. Ravindran. Safe Motherhood Initiatives: Critical Issues. 2000; Reproductive Health Matters: London.
  • United Nations Development Program. Human Development Report 2001: Making Technology Work for Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001
  • UNICEF/WHO/UNFPA. Guidelines for the monitoring and availability and use of obstetric services. New York: UNICEF, 1997
  • T. Wardlaw, D. Maine. Process indicators for maternal mortality programs. M. Berer, T.K.S. Ravindran. Safe Motherhood Initiatives: Critical Issues. 2000; Reproductive Health Matters: London.
  • World Bank. Safe Motherhood and The World Bank: Lessons from 10 Years of Experience. Washington DC: Human Development Network, 1999
  • K. Hanson, P. Berman. Private health care provision in developing countries: a preliminary analysis of levels and composition. Health Policy and Planning. 13(3): 1998; 195–211.
  • D.H. Peters, A.E. Elmendorf, K. Kandola, G. Chellaraj. Benchmarks for health expenditures, services and outcomes in Africa during the 1990s. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 6(78): 2000; 761–769.
  • Misra R, Chatterjee R, Rao S. Changing the Indian Health System: Current Issues, Future Directions. New Delhi: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, 2002
  • A. Mills, R. Brugha, K. Hanson. What can be done about the private health sector in low-income countries?. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 80(4): 2002; 325–330.
  • Nandraj S, Muraleedharan VR, Baru RV et al. Private Health Sector in India: Review and Annotated Bibliography. Mumbai: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes; Foundation for Sustainable Development, Indian Institute of Technology (Madras); Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health, Jawaharal Nehru University (New Delhi), 2001
  • J.C. Robinson. Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Quarterly. 79(2): 2001; 149–177.
  • U.S. Mishra, M. Ramanathan. Delivery-related complications and determinants of caesarean section rates in India. Health Policy and Planning. 17(1): 2002; 90–98.
  • Pai MP, Sundaram P, Radhakrishnan KK et al. A high rate of caesarean sections in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern? National Medical Journal of India 12(4): 156–58.
  • K. Ranson, K.R. John. Quality of hysterectomy care in rural Gujarat: the role of community-based health insurance. Health Policy and Planning. 16(4): 2001; 395–403.
  • C.A.K. Yesudian. The behaviour of the private sector in the health service market of Bombay. Health Policy and Planning. 9(1): 1994; 72–80.
  • Mahal A, Singh J, Afridi F et al. Who “Benefits” From Public Sector Health Spending In India? Results Of A Benefit Incidence Analysis For India. Health, Nutrition, Population Working Paper Series. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2001
  • G. Walt, L. Gilson. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy and Planning. 9(4): 1994; 353–370.
  • P. Musgrove. Public spending on health care: how are different criteria related. Health Policy. 47(3): 1999; 207–223.
  • A. Preker, A. Harding, P. Travis. “Make or buy” decisions in the production of health care goods and services: new insights from institutional economics and organizational theory. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 78(6): 2000; 779–790.
  • Mukhopadhyay M editor. Report of the Independent Commission on Health in India. New Delhi: Voluntary Health Association of India Press, 1997
  • J.M. Belizan, F. Althabe, F.C. Barros. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. BMJ. 319: 1999; 1397–1400.
  • Self-Employed Women’s Association. Annual Report. Ahmedabad, 2000. Available from: http://www.sewa.org. Accessed 9 July 2002
  • Roberts MJ, Hsiao W, Berman P et al. Getting Health Reform Right. Washington DC: World Bank. In press
  • Saltman RB, Figueras J. European Heath Care Reform: Analysis of Current Strategies. WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No. 72, 1997
  • M.R. Reich. Political Mapping of Health Policy: A Guide for Managing the Political Dimensions of Health Policy. 1994; Harvard School of Public Health: Boston.
  • M.R. Reich. The politics of health sector reform in developing countries: three cases of pharmaceutical policy. Health Policy. 32(1-3): 1995; 47–77.
  • R. Brugha, Z. Varvasovzsky. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning. 15(3): 2000; 239–246.
  • S. Nandraj, A. Khot, S. Menon. A stakeholder approach towards hospital accreditation in India. Health Policy and Planning. 16(S2): 2001; 70–79.
  • M.E. Khan, J.W. Townsend. Has the Indian Family Welfare Programme Lost Momentum Under the Target Free Approach? Emerging Evidence. 1998; Population Council: New Delhi.
  • Loewenson R. Public Participation in Health: Making People Matter. IDS Working Paper No. 4. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 1999
  • T.A. Brennan, D.M. Berwick. New Rules: Regulation, Markets and the Quality of American Health Care. 1996; Jossey-Bass Publications: San Francisco.
  • R. Baldwin, M. Cave. Understanding Regulation. 1992; Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  • Busse R, Hafez-Afifi N, Harding A. Regulation of health services. In: Harding A, Preker A, editors. Private Participation in Health Services Handbook. Washington DC: World Bank. In press
  • McKinsey & Company. Developing Successful Global Alliances. Seattle: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, 2002
  • D.H. Peters, S. Chao. The sector-wide approach in health: What is it? Where is it going?. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 13(2): 1998; 177–190.
  • B. Gray. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. 1991; Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco.
  • S.M. Shortell, A.P. Zukosky, J.A. Alexander. Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 27(1): 2002; 49–91.
  • K. Johnson, W. Grossman, A. Cassidy. Collaborating to Improve Community Health: Workbook and Guide to Best Practices in Creating Healthier Communities and Populations. 1997; Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco.
  • T. Ensor, S. Witter. Health economics in low income countries: adapting to the reality of the unofficial economy. Health Policy. 57(1): 2001; 1–13.
  • D.L. Sackett, S.E. Straus, W.S. Richardson. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practise and Teach EBM. 2nd ed., 2000; Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh.
  • A. Mills, R. Brugha, K. Hanson. What can be done about the private health sector in low-income countries?. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 80(4): 2002; 325–330.
  • Waters H, Hatt L, Axelson H. Working with the private sector for child health. Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper. Washington DC: World Bank, 2002

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.