Using Accountability to Improve Reproductive Health Care

References

• AM Goetz, J Gaventa. Bringing Citizen Voice and Client Focus into Service Delivery. IDS Working Paper 138. 2001; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• M Mackintosh. Informal regulation: a conceptual framework and application to decentralized mixed health care systems. M Mackintosh, R Roy. Economic Decentralization and Public Management Reform. 1999; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• M Mackintosh, L Gilson. Non-market relationships in health care. Open Discussion Papers in Economics. No. 19. 2000; Open University: Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• R Brugha, A Zwi. Improving the quality of private sector delivery of public health services: challenges and strategies. Health Policy and Planning. 13(2): 1998; 107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Schedler. Conceptualising accountability. A Schedler. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. 1999; Lynne Reinner: London.
   Google Scholar
• G O'Donnel. Horizontal accountability in new democracies. A Schedler. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. 1999; Lynne Reinner: London.
   Google Scholar
• P Newell, S Bellour. Mapping Accountability: Origins, Contexts and Implications for Development. IDS Working Paper 168. 2002; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• AM Goetz, R Jenkins. Hybrid forms of accountability: citizen engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in India. Public Management Review. 3(3): 2001; 363–383.
   Google Scholar
• A Cornwall, H Lucas, K Pasteur. Accountability through participation: developing workable partnership models in the health sector. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin. 31(1): 2000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Cornwall, A Welbourn. Realising Rights: Transforming Approaches to Sexual and Reproductive Well-Being. 2002; Zed Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• N Haberland, D Measham. Responding to Cairo: Case Studies of Changing Practice in Reproductive Health and Family Planning. 2002; Population Council: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Waters H, Hatt L, Axelson H. Working with the Private Sector for Child Health. Health, Nutrition and Population Discussion Paper. Washington DC: World Bank, 2002. Cited in: Peters, D.H. The role of oversight in the health sector: the example of sexual and reproductive health services in India. Reproductive Health Matters (2002); 10(20):82–94.
   Google Scholar
• A Schneider, H Ingram. Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review. 87(2): 1993; 334–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Barnes. Users as citizens: collective action and the local governance of welfare. Social Policy and Administration. 33(1): 1999; 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Scott. Weapons of the Weak: Everday Forms of Peasant Resistance. 1985; Yale University Press: New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• RP Petchesky, K Judd. Negotiating Reproductive Rights: Women's Perspectives Across Countries and Cultures. 1998; Zed Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• A Oakley. Who cares for health? Social relations, gender, and the public health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 48: 1994; 427–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall A. Beneficiary, Consumer, Citizen: Perspectives on Participation for Poverty Reduction. SIDA Studies No. 2, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• J Wajcman Sen. Delivered into men's hands? The social construction of reproductive technology. G, R Snow. Power and Decision: The Social Control of Reproduction. 1994; Harvard School of Public Health: Boston.
   Google Scholar
• J Walsh, TKS Ravindran, M Berer, J Cottingham. Contraceptive choices: supporting effective use of methods. Beyond Acceptability: Users' Perspectives on Contraception. 1997; Reproductive Health Matters: London.
   Google Scholar
• LL Heise, TKS Ravindran, M Berer, J Cottingham. Beyond acceptability: reorienting research on contraceptive choice. Beyond Acceptability: Users' Perspectives on Contraception. 1997; Reproductive Health Matters: London.
   Google Scholar
• MA Koblinsky, O Campbell, J Heichelheim. Organising delivery care: what works for safe motherhood?. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 77(5): 1999; 399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Dı́az Haberland, R Simmons, J Dı́az. Action research to enhance reproductive choice in a Brazilian municipality: the Santa Barbara Project. N, D Measham. Responding to Cairo: Case Studies of Changing Practice in Reproductive Health and Family Planning. 2002; Population Council: New York.
   Google Scholar
• J Cottingham Sen, C Myntti. Conceptual mapping and evidence. G, A George, P Östlin. Engendering International Health: The Challenge of Equity. 2002; MIT Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran V. Mainstreaming gender in the health sector: reflections on South Asian experience. New Delhi, 2001. (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• S Mahmud. Making rights real in Bangladesh through collective citizen action. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin. 33(2): 2002; 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gender and Health Equity Karnataka Case Study Planning Meeting, Bangalore, 9 November 2002.
   Google Scholar
• R McGee, A Norton. Participation in Poverty Reduction Strategies: A Synthesis of Experience with Participatory Approaches to Policy Design, Implementation and Monitoring. IDS Working Paper 109. 2000; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna R, de Koning K. Women's health, human rights and the public health system: a case study of the women-centred health project. (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Comparative Table of RTI Laws and Bills in India. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative/ Consumer Rights Education and Awareness Trust. Distributed on 10 November 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Workshop on Operationalisation of Karnataka Right to Information Act 2000. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative/ Consumer Rights Education and Awareness Trust. Bangalore, 10 November 2002.
   Google Scholar
• A Gopalkrishnan. Information by Right. Frontline 2003; (17 January); 100–102.
   Google Scholar
• CJ Geefhuysen Berer. Safe motherhood in Indonesia: a task for the next century. M, TKS Ravindran. Safe Motherhood Initiatives: Critical Issues. 1999; Reproductive Health Matters: London.
   Google Scholar
• M Westerby Cornwall, J Harris. At your service: participatory evaluation in practice. A, A Welbourn. Realising Rights: Transforming Approaches to Sexual and Reproductive Well-Being. 2002; Zed Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• R Khanna Cornwall, K de Koning, S Khandekar. “As our friends or sisters”: the role of participatory research in sensitising Auxiliary Nurse Midwives to a woman-centred approach to health care in Mumbai, India. A, A Welbourn. Realising Rights: Transforming Approaches to Sexual and Reproductive Well-Being. 2002; Zed Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• L Howard-Grabman Cornwall, CP Willis, E Arteaga. A dialogue of knowledge approach to better reproductive, sexual and child health in rural Andean communities. A, A Welbourn. Realising Rights: Transforming Approaches to Sexual and Reproductive Well-Being. 2002; Zed Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• N Murthy Haberland, L Ramachandar, PJ Pelto. Dismantling India's contraceptive target system: an overview and three case studies. N, D Measham. Responding to Cairo: Case Studies of Changing Practice in Reproductive Health and Family Planning. 2002; Population Council: New York.
   Google Scholar
• M Nichter. The primary health centre as a social system: primary health care, social status, and the issue of team-work in south Asia. Social Science and Medicine. 23(4): 1986; 347–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Atkinson. Going down to the local: incorporating social organisation and political culture into assessments of decentralised health care. Social Science and Medicine. 51: 2000; 619–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Tendler. Good Government in the Tropics. 1997; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• A Cornwall. Locating citizen participation. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin. 33(2): 2002; 49–58. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin.
   Google Scholar
• I Guijt, M Kaul Shah. The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development. 1998; Intermediate Technology Publications: London.
   Google Scholar
• DH Peters. The role of oversight in the health sector: the example of sexual and reproductive health services in India. Reproductive Health Matters. 10(20): 2002; 82–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar