Policy Implications of a National Public Opinion Survey on Abortion in Mexico

References

• World Health Organization. Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2000. 4th ed, 2004; WHO: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• OA Ladipo. Preventing and managing complications of induced abortion in Third World countries International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 3(Suppl.): 1989; 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• J Paxman, A Rizo, L Brown. The clandestine epidemic: the practice of unsafe abortion in Latin America Studies in Family Planning. 24(4): 1993; 205–226.
   Google Scholar
• E Áhman, I Shah. Unsafe abortion: worldwide estimates for 2000 Reproductive Health Matters. 10(19): 2002; 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• B Ganatra, HB Johnston. Reducing abortion-related mortality in South Asia: a review of constraints and a road map for change Journal of American Medical Women’s Association. 57(3): 2002; 159–164.
   Google Scholar
• M Berer. Making abortions safe: a matter of good public health policy and practice Reproductive Health Matters. 10(19): 2002; 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• CONAPO. Cuadernos de salud reproductiva — República Mexicana. 2000; CONAPO: México DF.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Abortion: A Tabulation of Available Data on the Frequency and Mortality of Maternal Health and Unsafe Abortion. 1994; WHO: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida (GIRE). Miradas sobre el Aborto. 2000; METIS, Productos Culturales, S.A. de CV: México DF.
   Google Scholar
• A Rahman, L Katzive, SK Henshaw. A global review of laws on induced abortion, 1985—1997 International Family Planning Perspectives. 24(2): 1999; 56–64.
   Google Scholar
• D Lara, S Garcia, J Strickler. El acceso al aborto legal de las mujeres embarazadas por violación en la ciudad de México Gaceta Médica de México. 139(S1): 2003; S77–S90.
   Google Scholar
• E Barraza. Aborto y Pena en México. 2003; Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Penales: México DF.
   Google Scholar
• E Poniatowska. Las mil y una… (la herida de Paulina). 2000; Plaza Janés Editores, SA: Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• GIRE. Paulina: In the name of the law. 2001; GIRE: México DF.
   Google Scholar
• R Taracena. Social actors and discourse on abortion in the Mexican press: the Paulina case Reproductive Health Matters. 10(19): 2002; 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Magally S. En vigor, las reformas al Código Penal en el DF sobre aborto. Comunicación e información de la mujer (CIMAC). 2000 Sep 25. At: http://www.cimac.org.mx/noticias/00sep/00092501.html. Accessed 14 April 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal. Decreto por el que se reforman y adicionan diversas disposiciones del código de procedimientos penales para el Distrito Federal Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal, México 148: 2000; 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• M Lamas, BS Bissell. Abortion and politics in Mexico: “Context is all” Reproductive Health Matters. 8(16): 2000; 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• J Klesner. Democratic transition? The 1997 Mexican elections Political Science and Politics. 30(4): 1997; 703–711.
   Google Scholar
• S Pick de Weiss. Resultado de tres encuestas nacionales de opinión sobre el aborto, México 1991—1993 Encuentro de Investigadores sobre Aborto Inducido en América Latina y el Caribe, parte 2. 1994; Universidad Externado de Colombia: Bogotá, 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• GIRE. Análysis de Resultados de Comunicación y de Opinión Pública. Estudio de opinión pública sobre aborto en el Distrito Federal. Apr. 1999
   Google Scholar
• Estadástica Aplicada. Estudio de Opinión sobre el Aborto en el Estado de Guanajuato. Aug. 2000
   Google Scholar
• LL Bumpass. The measurement of public opinion on abortion: the effects of survey design Family Planning Perspectives. 29(4): 1997; 177–180.
   Google Scholar
• Cook EA, Jelen TG, Wilcox C. Measuring public attitudes on abortion: methodological and substantive considerations. Family Planning Perspectives. 1993; 25 (3): 118.—21, 145.
   Google Scholar
• JM Converse, S Presser. Survey questions: handcrafting the standardized questionnaire Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. 1986; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Estudios de Opinión, Universidad de Guadalajara. Estudio para conocer la percepción de la población del Estado de Guanajuato sobre la penalización de la práctica del aborto. Aug 2000
   Google Scholar
• M Diego. Preguntas inducidas, en el sondeo sobre el aborto en Guanajuato La Jornada. 2000 Aug 22 Sect. Polática:15
   Google Scholar
• Conteo de Población y Vivienda, INEGI, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• DW Hosmer, S Lemeshow. Applied Logistic Regression. 1989; John Wiley and Sons: New York.
   Google Scholar
• A Amuchástegui Herrera, M Rivas Zivy. Clandestine abortion in Mexico: a question of mental as well as physical health Reproductive Health Matters. 10(19): 2002; 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• S Cohen. Encuestas de opinión pública sobre el aborto en México. A Ortiz Ortega. Razones y Pasiones en Torno al Aborto. 1994; Population Council: Mexico City, 112–115.
   Google Scholar
• Culler TA. Paper justice. Conscience 2000; 21(2): 16.—18, 27.
   Google Scholar
• Mexican authorities warn Roman Catholic priests to avoid political involvement following complaint by abortion-rights supporting party Kaiser Reports. 2003 Aug 20 At: http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?hint=2&DR_ID=19446. Accessed 10 September 2003
   Google Scholar
• RA Camp. The cross in the polling booth: religion, politics, and the laity in Mexico Latin American Research Review. 29(3): 1994; 69–100.
   Google Scholar
• R Blancarte. El Papel de la Religión en México. Un informe de Religion Counts. 2003; Park Ridge Center: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar