Study Supports the Introduction of Early Medical Abortion in Turkey

References

• Population Planning Law, No.2827, published in the official gazette of 27 May 1983 No.18059. Ankara, Turkey.(Nüfus Planlaması Yasası # 2827, Resmi Gazete, 27 Mayıs 1983, sayı: 18059, Ankara, Turkiye).
   Google Scholar
• A Koseli. Women's health and reproductive health care within the framework of the 2003 Demographic and Health Survey of Turkey. Population Challenges, International Migration and Reproductive Health in Turkey and the European Union: Issues and Policy Implications. 2004; Turkish Family Health and Planning Foundation: Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• A Akin, T Enunlu. Induced abortion in Turkey. A Akin. Contraception and Maternal Health Services in Turkey: Results of Further Analysis of 1998 Turkish DHS. 2002; Hacettepe University, TFHP Foundation and UNFPA: Ankara, 147–175.
   Google Scholar
• Hacettepe University, Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health, Mother and Child Health and Family Planning General Directorate, State Planning Organisation and European Union. Turkish Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Ankara, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• G Ergör, A Akin. Abortion in Turkey. A Akin, M Bertan. Contraception, Abortion and Maternal Health Services in Turkey. 1996; Ministry of Health (Turkey) and Macro International: Calverton MD, 91–113.
   Google Scholar
• BS Ozvaris, L Akin, A Akin. The role and influence of stakeholders and donors on reproductive health services in Turkey: a critical review. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24): 2004; 116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Huntington, AA Dervisoglu, JM Pile. The quality of abortion services in Turkey. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 53: 1996; 41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO/HRP collaborative project to develop training methods for physicians to provide family planning and pregnancy terminations. Ankara: Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Department of Public Health, 1982. (Unpublished report).
   Google Scholar
• Planning for the future of family planning in Turkey. 1992; Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health General Directorate, Mother and Child Health and Family Planning: Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• A Bulut. Abortion services in two public sector hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey: how well do they meet women's needs?. AI Mundigo, C Indriso. Abortion in the Developing World. 1999; Zed Books for WHO: London, 259–278.
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health General Directorate, MCH/FP. National Family Planning Service Guidebook (1): Family Planning and Reproductive Health. Ankara, 1996 (Updated 2002).
   Google Scholar
• A Akın, GB Doğan, S Mıhçıokur. Survey of the causes of maternal mortality from the hospital records in Turkey. 2000; Ministry of Health (Turkey), Hacettepe University Medical School Public Health Department, WHO and UNFPA: Ankara. Unpublished report.
   Google Scholar
• Medical abortion: meeting women's needs. J Hebden. An FPA Report in Conjunction with the Population Council. 1999; Newnorth Print: London.
   Google Scholar
• C Ellerston, B Elul, B Winikoff. Can women use medical abortion without medical supervision?. Reproductive Health Matters. 5(9): 1997; 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2003; WHO: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• B Elul, S Hajri, NN Ngoc. Can women in less-developed countries use a simplified medical abortion regimen?. Lancet. 357: 2001; 1402–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NT Ngoc, VQ Nhan, J Blum. Is home-based administration of prostaglandin safe and feasible for medical abortion? Results from a multi-site study in Vietnam. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 111(8): 2004; 814–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Comparison of two doses of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for early medical abortion: a randomized trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 107: 2000; 524–530.
   Google Scholar
• S Hajri, J Blum, N Gueddana. Expanding medical abortion in Tunisia: women's experiences from a multi-site expansion study. Contraception. 70: 2004; 487–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K Abuabara, S Blum. Providing Medical Abortion in Developing Countries - An Introductory Guidebook. 2004; Gynuity Health Projects: New York.
   Google Scholar
• CS Shannon, B Winikoff. Misoprostol, An Emerging Technology for Women's Health. Report of a Seminar. 2004; Population Council: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kocoglu OG. Comparison of medical abortion by using mifepristone and misoprostol with surgical methods in terms of outcomes and side effects. Ankara: Hacettepe University Medical School Public Health Department, 2002. (Unpublished report) (Mifepriston ve Misoprostol ile yapılan Tıbbi Düşük yönteminin yan etki ve sonuçları yönünden Cerrahi Düşük yöntemi ile karşılaştırılması. Ankara: Hacettepe “niversitesi Tıp Fakültesi,Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı, 2002).
   Google Scholar
• A Akin, J Blum, S Ozalp. Results and lessons learned from a small medical abortion clinical study in Turkey. Contraception. 70: 2004; 401–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. National Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines. London: RCOG, September 2004.
   Google Scholar