Dual Protection: More Needed than Practised or Understood

References

• M Berer. Dual protection: making sex safer for women. Beyond Acceptability: Users’ Perspectives on Contraception. 1997; Reproductive Health Matters for WHO: London. At: <http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/beyond_acceptability_users_perspectives_on_contraception/berer.en.pdf>.
   Google Scholar
• M Douthwaite, P Miller, M Sultana. Couple communication and sexual satisfaction among withdrawal users in Pakistan. Reproductive Health Matters. 6(12): 1998; 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• N Ortayli, A Bulut, M Ozugurlu. Why withdrawal, why not withdrawal? Men’s perspectives. Reproductive Health Matters. 13(25): 2005; 164–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Ali MM. Sexual continence, contraception and condoms: trends in young African women: 1993–2001. (Draft paper).
   Google Scholar
• MK Rawlings, RJ Graff, R Calderon. Differences in perceptions of what constitutes having “had sex” in a population of people living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of National Medical Association. 98(6): 2006; 845–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T Raine, AM Minnis, NS Padian. Determinants of contraceptive method among young women at risk for unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Contraception. 68: 2003; 19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F Juarez, T LeGrand. Factors influencing boys’ age at first intercourse and condom use in the shantytowns of Recife, Brazil. Studies in Family Planning. 36(1): 2005; 57–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MM Ali, J Cleland, I Shah. Condom use within marriage: a neglected HIV intervention. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 82: 2004; 180–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PJ Poppen, CA Reisen. Women’s use of dual methods of sexual self-protection [Abstract]. Matern Child Health J. 2(4): 1998; 201–209.
   Google Scholar
• L Adeokun, JE Mantell, E Weiss. Promoting dual protection in family planning clinics in Ibadan, Nigeria. International Family Planning Perspectives. 28(2): 2002; 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• I Kleinschmidt, BN Maggwa, J Smit. Dual protection in sexually active women. South African Medical Journal. 93(11): 2003; 854–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L Myer, C Morroni, C Matthews. Dual method use in South Africa. International Family Planning Perspectives. 28(2): 2002; 119–121.
   Google Scholar
• H Sangi-Haghpeykar, AN Poindexter 3rd. Planned condom use among women undergoing tubal sterilization. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 25(7): 1998; 335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RM Barbosa, WV Villela. Sterilisation and sexual behaviour among women in São Paulo, Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters. 3(5): 1995; 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• SR Wilson, NL Brown, V Chin. Condom use by women recently diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection: effects of study methodology on the apparent influence of hormonal/surgical contraception [Abstract]. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 31(12): 2004; 740–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JE Mantell, S Hoffman, TM Exner. Family planning providers’ perspectives on dual protection. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 35(2): 2003; 71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LH Bearinger, MD Resnick. Dual method use in adolescents: a review and framework for research on use of STD and pregnancy protection. Journal of Adolescent Health. 32: 2003; 340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SM Harvey, JT Henderson, MR Branch. Protecting against both pregnancy and disease: predictors of dual method use among a sample of women. Women Health. 39(1): 2004; 25–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intrauterine contraceptive devices and risk of pelvic inflammatory disease: standards of care in high STI prevalence settings. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(23): 2004; 136–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SM Harvey, ST Bird, MR Branch. A new look at an old method: the diaphragm. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 35(6): 2003; 270–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Rieder, SM Coupey. The use of nonhormonal methods of contraception in adolescents [Abstract]. Pediatr Clin North Am. 46(4): 1999; 671–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO/CONRAD Technical Consultation on Nonoxynol-9, World Health Organization. Geneva, 9–10 October 2001: Summary Report. Reproductive Health Matters. 10(20): 2002; 175–181.
   Google Scholar
• TL Walsh, RG Frezieres, K Peacock. Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials. Contraception. 70: 2004; 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T Valappil, J Kelaghan, M Macaluso. Female condom and male condom failure among women at high risk of sexually transmitted diseases. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 32(1): 2005; 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JC Shlay, MW McClung, JL Patnaik. Comparison of sexually transmitted disease prevention by reported level of condom use among patients attending an urban sexually transmitted disease clinic. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 31(3): 2004; 154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P Maharaj. Obstacles to negotiating dual protection: perspectives of men and women. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 5(3): 2001; 150–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J Richters. Coitus interruptus: could it reduce the risk of HIV transmission?. Reproductive Health Matters. 2(3): 1994; 105–107.
   Google Scholar
• I DeVincenzi, . for the European Study Group on Heterosexual Transmission of HIV. Heterosexual transmission of HIV in a European cohort of couples. Abstract WS-CO2-1. 9th International Conference on AIDS. Berlin. 6–11 June. 1993. Reported in [13].
   Google Scholar
• T Delvaux, F Crabbé, S Seng. The need for family planning and safe abortion services among women sex workers seeking STI care in Cambodia. Reproductive Health Matters. 11(21): 2003; 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Rossier, H Leridon. The pill and the condom: substitution or association? An analysis of the contraceptive histories of young women in France 1978–2000. Population-E. 3/4: 2004; 387–414.
   Google Scholar
• LD Lindberg, L Ku, FL Sonenstein. Adolescent males’ combined use of condoms with partners’ use of female contraceptive methods. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2(4): 1998; 201–209.
   Google Scholar
• JS Santelli, CW Warren, R Lowry. The use of condoms with other contraceptive methods among young men and women. Family Planning Perspectives. 29(6): 1997; 261–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C Thompson, H Smith. “Condom club”: an interface between teenage sex and genitourinary medicine [Abstract]. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 12(7): 2004; 475–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DM Walker, P Torres, JP Gutierrez. Emerigency contraceptive use is correlated with increased condom use among adolescents: results from Mexico. Journal of Adolescent Health. 35: 2004; 329–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Bastianell, M Farris, G Benagiano. Reasons for requesting emergency contraception: a survey of 500 Italian women. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. 10(3): 2005; 157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Lindsay, AMA Smith, DA Rosenthal. Conflicting advice? Australian adolescents’ use of condoms or the pill. Family Planning Perspectives. 31(4): 1999; 190–194.
   Google Scholar
• MJ Sparrow. Condom failures in women presenting for abortion. New Zealand Medical Journal. 112: 1999; 319–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Belzer, E Yoshida, T Tejirian. Advanced supply of emergency contraception for adolescent mothers increased utlization without reducing condom or primary contraception use [Research summary]. Journal of Adolescent Health. 32(2): 2003; 122–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MR Golden, WLH Whittington, HH Handsfield. Failure of family planning referral and high interest in advanced provision of emergency contraception among women contacted for STD notification. Contraception. 69: 2004; 241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar