Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States

References

• Gonzales v. Carhart 127 S.CT. 1610; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.18 USC §1531; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• LT Strauss, SB Gamble, WY Parker. Abortion surveillance: United States, 2003. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summary. 55(11): 2006; 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Roe v. Wade. 410 U.S. 113; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• LH Tribe. Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. 1992; Norton: New York.
   Google Scholar
• NEH Hull, W Hoffer, PC Hoffer. The Abortion Rights Controversy in America: A Legal Reader. 2004; University of North Carolina Press: Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. 505 U.S. 833; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell M. Dilation and extraction for late second trimester abortion. second trimester abortion: from every angle. National Abortion Federation Risk Management Seminar. Dallas, 13–14 September 1992. p.27–34.
   Google Scholar
• C Gorney. Gambling with abortion: why both sides think they have everything to lose. Harpers. 309(1854): 2004; 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• AW Esacove. Dialogic framing: the framing/counterframing of “partial-birth” abortion. Sociological Inquiry. 74(1): 2004; 70–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Several Sources Shelters. The Silent Scream. April 2007. At: <www.silentscream.org. >.
   Google Scholar
• P Baird-Windle, EJ Bader. Targets of Hatred: Anti-Abortion Terrorism. 2001; Palgrave for St. Martin's Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• C Gorney. Articles of Faith: A Frontline History of the Abortion Wars. 1998; Simon & Schuster: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Petchesky RP. Fetal images: the power of visual culture. In: The Politics of Reproduction. Feminist Studies 1987;13(2):263–92.
   Google Scholar
• C Mason. Cracked babies and the partial birth of a nation: millennialism and fetal citizenship. Cultural Studies. 14(1): 2000; 35–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup Poll News Service. Gallup's Pulse of Democracy: Abortion. Accessed 1 April 2007. At: <www.galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=1576&pg=1&VERSION=p. >.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights. So-Called ‘Partial-Birth Abortion’ Ban Legislation: By State. 2004. Accessed 17 August 2007. At: <www.reproductiverights.org/pdf/pub_bp_pba_bystate.pdf. >.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg v. Carhart. 530 U.S. 914; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. John Ashcroft; City and Country of San Francisco v. John Ashcroft. 320 F Supp 2d 957: US District Court for the Notrthern District of California; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• National Abortion Federation et al v. John Ashcroft. 330 F Supp 2d 436: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Leroy Carhart et al v. John Ashcroft. 331 F Supp 2d 805: US District Court for the District of Nebraska; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. ACOG Statement on the US Supreme Court Decision Upholding the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Press release. 18 April 2007.
   Google Scholar
• NE Adler, HP David, BN Major. Psychological responses after abortion. Science. 248(4951): 1990; 41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NE Adler, HP David, BN Major. Psychological factors in abortion: a review. American Psychologist. 47(10): 1992; 1194–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LO Gostin. Abortion politics: clinical freedom, trust in the judiciary, and the autonomy of women. JAMA. 298(13): 2007; 1562–1564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AM Autry, EC Hayes, GF Jacobson. A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 187(2): 2002; 393–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PD Darney, E Atkinson, K Hirabayashi. Uterine perforation during second-trimester abortion by cervical dilation and instrumental extraction: a review of 15 cases. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 75(3 Pt 1): 1990; 441–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CJ Hogue. Impact of abortion on subsequent fecundity. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 13(1): 1986; 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• R Halperin, A Zimmerman, R Langer. Laminaria dilatation and evacuation for pregnancies with mid-trimester premature rupture of membranes: a retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 100(2): 2002; 181–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Petitioner v. Leroy Carhart, et al.: Oral Argument. Supreme Court 2007 November 8 [cited No. 05-380 July 12]; At: <www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/05-380.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• R Vesely. Courts force new abortion methods: Legal second-trimester procedures could be harmful to women. 2007 June 4 [cited 2007 June 6]. At: <www.insidebayarea.com/search/ci_6056631. >.
   Google Scholar
• PD Blumenthal, LD Castleman, JK Jain. Abortion by labor induction. M Paul, ES Lichtenberg, L Borgatta. A Clinician's Guide to Medical and Surgical Abortion. 1999; Churchill Livingstone: New York.
   Google Scholar
• RA Jackson, VL Teplin, EA Drey. Digoxin to facilitate late second-trimester abortion: a randomized, masked, placebo-controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 97(3): 2001; 471–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PD Darney, A Rosenfield. The Supreme Court joins the multispecialty group practice of the Congress and the President. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 110(2 Pt 1): 2007; 226–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RK Jones, MRS Zolna, SK Henshaw. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 40(1): 2008; 6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MF Greene. The intimidation of American physicians: banning partial-birth abortion. New England Journal of Medicine. 356(21): 2007; 2128–2129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Survey conducted by the Fellowship in Family Planning, May 2007, unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• C Joffe. The abortion procedure ban: Bush's gift to his base. Dissent. Fall: 2007; 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• ST Chasen, RB Kalish, M Gupta. Dilation and evacuation at >or=20 weeks: comparison of operative techniques. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 190(5): 2004; 1180–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CT Richardson, E Nash. Misinformed consent: the medical accuracy of state-developed abortion counseling materials. Guttmacher Policy Review. 2006; 6–11.
   Google Scholar