Maintaining Access to Safe Abortion and Reducing Sex Ratio Imbalances in Asia

References

• P Visaria. The sex ratio of the population of India and Pakistan and regional variations during 1901–61. A Bose. Patterns of population change in India 1951–61. 1967; Allied Publishers. 334–371.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. World population prospects: the 2006 revision. At: <http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=PopDiv&f=variableID%3a52. >. Accessed 2 May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• J Banister. Shortage of girls in China today. Journal of Population Research. 2004. At: <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PCG/is_1_21/ai_n6155263/pg_1?tag=artBody;col1. >. Accessed 14 March 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Registrar General of India. Primary census abstract, India. Census of India 2001. New Delhi: Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Social Development Studies. New “common sense”: family planning policy and sex ratio in Viet Nam. UNFPA, 2007. At: <www.unfpa.org/gender/docs/studies/Vietnam.pdf. >. Accessed 16 February 2008.
   Google Scholar
• D Belanger, K Oanh, L Jianye. Are sex ratios at birth increasing in Vietnam. Population (E). 58(2): 2003; 231–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CREHPA. Sex selection: pervasiveness and preparedness in Nepal. UNFPA, 2007. At: <www.unfpa.org/gender/docs/studies/nepal.pdf. >. Accessed 26 March 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Z Wu, K Viisainen, E Hemminki. Determinants of high sex ratio among newborns: a cohort study from rural Anhui province, China. Reproductive Health Matters. 14(27): 2006; 172–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Kim. Missing girls in South Korea: trends, levels and regional variations. Population (E). 59: 2004; 865–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T Hesketh, Li Lu, Z Xing. The effect of China's one-child family policy after 25 years. New England Journal of Medicine. 353: 2005; 1171–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PNM Bhat, AJF Zavier. Factors influencing the use of prenatal diagnostic techniques and the sex ratio at birth in India. Economic and Political Weekly. 16 June: 2007; 2292–2303.
   Google Scholar
• C Junhong. Prenatal sex determination and sex selective abortion in central China. Population and Development Review. 27(2): 2001; 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Almond, L Edlund. Son-biased sex ratios in the 2000 United States census. The National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2008. At: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0800703105. Accessed April 24, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• S Dubuc, D Coleman. An increase in the sex ratio of births to India-born mothers in England and Wales: Evidence for sex-selective abortion. Population and Development Review. 332): 2007; 383–400.
   Google Scholar
• W Chung, M Das Gupta. The decline of son preference in South Korea: the roles of development and public policy. Population and Development Review. 33(4): 2007; 757–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T Leone, Z Matthews, G Zuanna. Impact and determinants of sex preference in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives. 29(2): 2003; 69–75. At: <www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2906903.html. >. Accessed 23 January 2008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Government of Viet Nam. Decree 104/2003/ND-CP. Detailing and guiding the implementation of a number of articles of the population ordinance. Hanoi, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Law and Justice. The Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Amendment Act. 2002; Government of India: New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• A Villa. Sex preferences and fertility trends in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review. 6(2): 2006; 153–161.
   Google Scholar
• Unisa S, Pujari S, Ram U. Sex selective abortion in Haryana: evidence from pregnancy history and antenatal care. Economic and Political Weekly 2007;6 January;60–66.
   Google Scholar
• B Ganatra, S Hirve, V Rao. Sex-selective abortion: evidence from a community based study in western India. Asia-Pacific Population Journal. 16(2): 2001; 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• C Guilmoto. Characteristics of sex ratio imbalance in India and future scenarios. 2007; UNFPA.
   Google Scholar
• T Gammeltoft, H Nguyen. The commodification of obstetric ultrasound screening in Hanoi, Viet Nam. Reproductive Health Matters. 15(29): 2007; 163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Family Planning Commission of China. Population and Family Planning Law of the People's Republic of China. 2002; China Population Publishing House: Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• S Hirve. Abortion law, policy and services in India: a critical review. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24 Suppl): 2004; 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Thapa. Abortion law in Nepal: the road to reform. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24 Suppl): 2004; 85–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government cracks down on abortion practice. Viet Nam News. 17 October. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Visaria, L, Ramachandran V, Ganatra B, et al. Abortion in India: emerging issues from qualitative studies. Economic and Political Weekly 2004;24 November:5044–52.
   Google Scholar
• Xinhua. Guiyang to ban abortion after 14 weeks. China Daily. 16 December. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Xinhua. Henan bans gender selective abortions. China Daily. 3 January. 2007
   Google Scholar
• B Elul, S Barge, S Verma. Unwanted pregnancy and induced abortion: data from men and women in Rajasthan, India. 2004; Population Council: New Delhi, 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Nyblade L, Parasuraman S, et al. Abortion and contraception in India. New Delhi: International Centre for Research on Women, 2003. p.19/28–29.
   Google Scholar
• B Ganatra, S Hirve. Induced abortions among adolescent women in rural Maharashtra, India. Reproductive Health Matters. 10(19): 2002; 76–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I Jaising, C Sathyamala, A Basu. From the abnormal to the normal: preventing sex selective abortions through the law. 2007; Lawyers Collective: New Delhi, 87–88.
   Google Scholar
• V Nidadavolu, H Bracken. Abortion and sex determination: conflicting messages in information materials in a district of Rajasthan, India. Reproductive Health Matters. 14(27): 2006; 160–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F Naqvi. Images and icons: harnessing the power of mass media to promote gender equality and reduce practices of sex selection. 2006; BBC World Service Trust: New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• M Gupte. A walk down memory lane: an insider's reflections on the campaign against sex selective abortions. 2003; MASUM: Pune. At: <http://geneticsandsociety.org/downloads/200308_gupte.pdf. >.
   Google Scholar
• R Bhagat. Turning to faith to find the missing daughters. Hindu Business Line. 14 November. 2005
   Google Scholar
• R Copelon, C Zampas, E Brusie. Human rights begin at birth: international law and the claim of fetal rights. Reproductive Health Matters. 13(26): 2005; 120–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F Arnold, S Kishore. Sex selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review. 28(4): 2002; 759–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Gallo, N Nghia. Real life is different: a qualitative study of why women delay abortion until the second trimester in Vietnam. Social Science and Medicine. 64: 2007; 1812–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xinhua. China promotes girls to avoid glut of bachelors. China Daily. 8 August. 2006
   Google Scholar
• A Soondas. Girls uninterrupted in Nawanshahr. Times of India. 10 February. 2007
   Google Scholar
• V Sareen. Sorry, sex ratio dips again in Nawanshahr. Punjab Newsline. 3 July. 2008
   Google Scholar
• Chaba A. Fall from grace: declining sex ratio in Nawanshahr district. 27 April 2008.
   Google Scholar
• CC Ren, XH Miao, H Cheng. Detection of fetal sex in the peripheral blood of pregnant women. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 22(5): 2007; 377–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Varma. Technological fix: sex determination in India. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society. 22(1): 2002; 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• A Den Boer, V Hudson. The security threat of Asia's sex ratios. SAIS Review. 24(2): 2004; 27–43.
   Google Scholar