A Critical Appraisal of Laws on Second Trimester Abortion

References

• EA Drey, DG Foster, RA Jackson. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 107(1): 2006; 128–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2003. 5th ed., 2007; WHO: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• S Singh. Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: estimates from 13 developing countries. Lancet. 368: 2006; 1887–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Arilha, RM Barbosa. Cytotec in Brazil: “At least it doesn't kill”. Reproductive Health Matters. 1(2): 1993; 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• D Walker, L Campero, H Espinoza. Deaths from complications of unsafe abortion: misclassified second trimester deaths. Abortion Law, Policy and Practice in Transition. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24 Supplement): 2004; 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H Gebreselassie, MH Gallo, MA Monyo. The magnitude of abortion complications in Kenya. BJOG. 112(9): 2005; 1229–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IA Zhirova, OG Frolova, TM Astakhova. Abortion-related maternal mortality in the Russian Federation. Studies in Family Planning. 35(3): 2004; 178–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decree No. 485 voids Decree No. 567 of May 8, 1996. Cited in: Center for Reproductive Rights. Abortion worldwide: twelve years of reform. Briefing Paper. July 2007.
   Google Scholar
• C Tietze. Second-trimester abortion: a global view. WE Brenner, LG Keith, GS Berger. Second-Trimester Abortion. 1981; John Wright: Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Facts on induced abortion in the United States. 2008; Guttmacher Institute: New York. At: <www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.pdf. >.
   Google Scholar
• DA Grimes. Estimation of pregnancy-related mortality risk by pregnancy outcome, United States, 1991–1999. American Journal Obstetrics & Gynecology. 194(1): 2006; 92–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Grossman, K Blanchard, P Blumenthal. Complications after second trimester surgical and medical abortion. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008; 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2007. Statistical Bulletin 2008/1. 19 June 2008. At: <www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_085508. >.
   Google Scholar
• Reproductive Rights Alliance. Barometer. 2(1): 1998
   Google Scholar
• J Harries, P Orner, M Gabriel. Delays in seeking an abortion until the second trimester: a qualitative study in South Africa. Reproductive Health. 4(1): 2007; 7.
   Google Scholar
• Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 1996: Republic of South Africa. Reproductive Health Matters. 5(9): 1997; 116–118.
   Google Scholar
• M Berer. National laws and unsafe abortion: the parameters of change. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24 Suppl): 2004; 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SA Cohen. New data on abortion incidence, safety, illuminate key aspects of worldwide abortion debate. Guttmacher Policy Review. 10(4): 2007
   Google Scholar
• Abortion ban passed; first pregnant woman dies [Round Up]. Reproductive Health Matters. 15(29): 2007; 210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Gevers. Abortion legislation and the future of the ‘counseling model’. European Journal of Health Law. 13: 2006; 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• O Loeber, C Wijsen. Factors influencing the percentage of second trimester abortions in the Netherlands. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008. 30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Ingham, E Lee, SJ Clements. Reasons for second trimester abortion in England and Wales. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008. 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China: abortion policy. Abortion: A Global Review. United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2002. At: <www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/profiles.htm. >.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Sweden. The Abortion Act 1974:595. With amendments up to and including Swedish Code of Statutes 2005:294. (Unofficial translation). At: <www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/06/28/70/4755c9dc.pdf. >.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers S. Abortion denied: bearing the limits of law. (Manuscript as at March 2007).
   Google Scholar
• S Yanow, TA Weitz. Implications of the federal abortion ban for women's health in the United States. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008. 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Windisch, citing Leslie Cannold of Pro-Choice Victoria. Decriminalise abortion now! Green Left Online. 14 June 2008. At: <www.greenleft.org.au/2008/755/39006. >.
   Google Scholar
• SS Hirve. Abortion law, policy and services in India: a critical review. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24 Suppl): 2004; 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambodia: abortion policy. Abortion Policies: A Global Review. United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2002. At: <www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/profiles.htm. >.
   Google Scholar
• Portugal Law No.16/2007 of 17 April 2007 determining the cases in which voluntary termination of pregnancy is not illegal. (Diário da República, Part I, 17 April 2007, No. 75, pp. 2417–2418). WHO International Digest of Legislation. At: <www.who.int/idhl-rils/results.cfm?language=english&type=ByTopic&strTopicCode=VII&strRefCode=Port>.
   Google Scholar
• Cuba: abortion policy. Abortion Policies: A Global Review. United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2002. At: <www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/profiles.htm. >.
   Google Scholar
• S Shakya, S Kishore, C Bird. Abortion law reform in Nepal: women's right to life and health. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24 Suppl): 2004; 75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights. Abortion worldwide: twelve years of reform. Briefing Paper. July 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Burkina Faso: abortion policy. Abortion Policies: A Global Review. United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2002. At: <www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/profiles.htm. >.
   Google Scholar
• LL Ferreira da Costa, E Hardy, MJ Duarte Osis. Termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality incompatible with life: women's experiences in Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters. 13(26): 2005; 139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas S. STF libera aborto em caso de anencefalia. Folha de São Paulo. São Paulo, 2 July 2004. Suplemento Folha Cotidiano. p.4. Cited in: Ferreira da Costa LL, et al.6
   Google Scholar
• Ipas. 2nd Brazil update. E-mail. 14 July 2008.
   Google Scholar
• D Paintin. Abortion after 24 weeks. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 104(4): 1997; 398–400.
   Google Scholar
• D Diniz. Antecipação terapêutica do parto: uma releitura bioética do aborto por anomalia fetal no Brasil. D Diniz, DC Ribeiro. Aborto por Anomalia Fetal. 2003; Debora Diniz: Brasília, 21–92. Cited in: Ferreira da Costa LL, et al.33.
   Google Scholar
• 30.000 women travel to London every year for abortions. El País Semanal No.1. 3 October 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Abortion statistics. 2006; DoH: London.
   Google Scholar
• Madrid pledges protection to abortion clinics striking over attacks. Deutsche Presse Agentur, 10 January 2008.
   Google Scholar
• El Periodico, 30 April 2008. Reported in: Womens Enews, 3 May 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Agence-France Presse, 11July 2008. Cited in: Cheers and Jeers of the Week. Women's E-news, 19 July 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch woman fails to halt murder investigation linked to late abortion in Spain. Associated Press, 31 January 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch woman freed after “illegal” abortion. 13 December 2008. At: <www.radionetherlands.nl/news/international/5555842/Dutch-woman-freed-after-illegal-abortion. >.
   Google Scholar