Non-physician clinicians can safely provide first trimester medical abortion

References

• CW Dugger. Lacking doctors, Africa is training substitutes. New York Times. 23 November. 2004
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. Mid-level and nurse practitioners in the Pacific: models and issues. 2001; WHO: Manila.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Safe abortion: Technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2003; World Health Organization: Geneva. At: <www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/safe_abortion/safe_abortion.pdf. >. Accessed 25 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• DE Mittman, JF Cawley, WH Fenn. Physician assistants in the United States. British Medical Journal. 325(7362): 2002; 485–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M da Luz Vaz, S Bergstrom. Mozambique: delegation of responsibility in the area of maternal care. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 38(Suppl): 1992; S37–S39.
   Google Scholar
• Libombo A, Bay Usta M. Mozambique abortion situation: country report. Expanding access: advancing the roles of midlevel providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Ipas conference report. South Africa; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Oguttu M, Odongo P. Midlevel providers' role in abortion care: Kenya country report. Expanding access: advancing the roles of midlevel providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Ipas conference Report. South Africa; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson I, Zatterstrom C, Sundstrom K. Midwives' role in management of medical abortion: Swedish country report. Expanding access: advancing the roles of midlevel providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Ipas conference report. South Africa; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Skilled care during childbirth. 2002; Family Care International: New York City.
   Google Scholar
• ES Sekscenski, S Sansom, C Bazell. State practice environments and the supply of physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse-midwives. New England Journal of Medicine. 331(19): 1994; 1266–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Abortion Federation. The role of physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurse-midwives in providing abortions: Strategies for Expanding Abortion Access. 1997; NAF: Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ipas, IHCAR. Deciding women's lives are worth saving: expanding the role of midlevel providers in safe abortion care. Chapel Hill, 2002. At: <www.ipas.org/Publications/asset_upload_file460_2494.pdf. >. Accessed 23 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Long C, Ren N. Abortion in Cambodia: country report. Expanding access: advancing the roles of midlevel providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Ipas conference report. South Africa; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Akhter HH. Midlevel provider in menstrual regulation, Bangladesh experience. Expanding access: advancing the roles of midlevel providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Ipas conference report. South Africa; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• K Dickson-Tetteh, DK Billings. Abortion care services provided by registered midwives in South Africa. International Family Planning Perspectives. 28(3): 2002; 7.
   Google Scholar
• van der Westhuizen C. Midwifes' roles in expanding access to and the management of safe abortion care: South African country report. Expanding access: advancing the roles of midlevel providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Ipas conference report. South Africa, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Nghia DT, Khe ND. Vietnam abortion situations: country report. Expanding access: advancing the roles of midlevel providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Ipas conference report. South Africa; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• IK Warriner, O Meirik, M Hoffman. Rates of complication in first-trimester manual vacuum aspiration abortion done by doctors and mid-level providers in South Africa and Vietnam: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 368(9551): 2006; 1965–1972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Bhatia, AS Faruque, J Chakraborty. Assessing menstrual regulation performed by paramedics in rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning. 11(6): 1980; 213–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Joffe, S Yanow. Advanced practice clinicians as abortion providers: current developments in the United States. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24 Suppl): 2004; 198–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B Kruse. Advanced practice clinicians and medical abortion: increasing access to care. Journal of American Medical Women's Association. 55(3 Suppl): 2000; 167–168.
   Google Scholar
• MA Freedman, DA Jillson, RR Coffin. Comparison of complication rates in first trimester abortions performed by physician assistants and physicians. American Journal of Public Health. 76(5): 1986; 550–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Berer. Provision of abortion by mid-level providers: international policy, practice and perspectives. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 87: 2009; 58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MB Goldman, JS Occhiuto, LE Peterson. Physician assistants as providers of surgically induced abortion services. American Journal of Public Health. 94(8): 2004; 1352–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights. Promote access to the full range of abortion technologies: remove barriers to medical abortion. CRR; 2005. At: <www.reproductiverights.org/pdf/pub_bp_tk_technologies1.pdf. >. Accessed 30 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• International Consensus Conference on Non-surgical (Medical) Abortion in Early First Trimester on Issues Related to Regimens and Service Delivery: frequently asked clinical questions about medical abortion. 2006; WHO: Bellagio. At: <http://who.int/reproductive-health/publications/medical_abortion/faq.pdf. >. Accessed 25 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Medical methods for termination of pregnancy. 1997; WHO: Geneva. At: <http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_871.pdf. >. Accessed 25 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant: a joint statement by WHO, ICM, and FIGO. 2004; WHO: Geneva. At: <http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241591692.pdf. >. Accessed 25 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• K Abuabara, J Blum. Providing medical abortion in developing countries: an introductory guidebook. 2004; Gynuity Health Projects: New York. At: <http://gynuity.org/downloads/MA_guidebook_fre.pdf. >. Accessed 23 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives. Essential competencies for basic midwifery practice, 2002. 2002; ICM: The Hague. At: <www.internationalmidwives.org/Portals/5/Documentation/Essential%20Compsenglish_2002-JF_2007%20FINAL.pdf. >. Accessed 25 September 2008.
   Google Scholar
• A Afable-Munsuz, H Gould, F Stewart. Provider practice models for and costs of delivering medication abortion: evidence from 11 US abortion care settings. Contraception. 75(1): 2007; 45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse B, Gordon R, Tanenhaus J. The role of midlevel providers in abortion care in the United States. Expanding access: advancing the roles of midlevel providers in menstrual regulation and elective abortion care. Conference report. South Africa; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• RK Jones, SK Henshaw. Mifepristone for early medical abortion: experiences in France, Great Britain and Sweden. Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health. 34(3): 2002; 154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GD Andrews, K French, CL Wilkinson. Appropriately trained nurses are competent at inserting intrauterine devices: an audit of clinical practice. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 4(1): 1999; 41–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• S Mundle, B Elul, A Anand. Increasing access to safe abortion services in rural India: experiences with medical abortion in a primary health center. Contraception. 76(1): 2007; 66–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K Coyaji. Early medical abortion in India: three studies and their implications for abortion services. Journal of American Medical Womens Association. 55(3 Suppl): 2000; 191–194.
   Google Scholar
• K Coyaji, B Elul, U Krishna. Mifepristone abortion outside the urban research hospital setting in India. Lancet. 357(9250): 2001; 120–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RK Jones, MR Zolna, SK Henshaw. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health. 40(1): 2008; 6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JB Samora, N Leslie. The role of advanced practice clinicians in the availability of abortion services in the United States. Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Neonatal Nursing. 36(5): 2007; 471–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DA Grimes, J Benson, S Singh. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 368(9550): 2006; 1908–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Murthy, MD Creinin. Pharmacoeconomics of medical abortion: a review of cost in the United States, Europe and Asia. Expert Opinion Pharmacotherapy. 4(4): 2003; 503–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MD Creinin. Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion. Contraception. 62(3): 2000 Sep; 117–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H Hamoda, PW Ashok, GM Flett. A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 112(8): 2005; 1102–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Sharma, H El-Refaey, H Mitchel. Mifepristone vaginally in an early medical abortion regimen: a pilot study. Contraception. 73(3): 2006; 261–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P Ravn, A Rasmussen, UB Knudsen. An outpatient regimen of combined oral mifepristone 400 mg and misoprostol 400 microg for first-trimester legal medical abortion. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 84(11): 2005; 1098–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Ellertson, W Simonds, B Winikoff. Providing mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion: the view from the clinic. Journal of American Medical Women's Association. 54(2): 1999; 91–96.
   Google Scholar
• LJ Beckman, SM Harvey, SJ Satre. The delivery of medical abortion services: the views of experienced providers. Women's Health Issues. 12(2): 2002; 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTN Ngoc, B Winikoff, S Clark. Safety, efficacy and acceptability of mifespristone-misoprostol medical abortion in Vietnam. International Family Planning Perspectives. 25(1): 1999; 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• S Hajri, R Ben Aissa, R Dabash. Ten years of medical abortion services and innovations in Tunisia. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. 13(1): 2008; 25–26.
   Google Scholar
• S Hajri. Medical abortion: the Tunisian experience. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 8(1): 2004; 63–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. National evidence-based clinical guidelines: the care of women requesting induced abortion. 2004; RCOG: London.
   Google Scholar
• WH Clark, M Gold, D Grossman. Can mifepristone medical abortion be simplified? A review of the evidence and questions for future research. Contraception. 75(4): 2007; 245–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PW Ashok, GM Flett, A Templeton. Termination of pregnancy at 9–13 weeks' amenorrhoea with mifepristone and misoprostol. Lancet. 352(9127): 1998; 542–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EV Gouk, K Lincoln, A Khair. Medical termination of pregnancy at 63 to 83 days gestation. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 106(6): 1999; 535–539.
   Google Scholar
• C Shannon, B Winikoff. How much supervision is necessary for women taking mifepristone and misoprostol for early medical abortion. Women's Health. 4(2): 2008; 5.
   Google Scholar
• C Shannon, LP Brothers, NM Philip. Ectopic pregnancy and medical abortion. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 104(1): 2004; 161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Edwards, SA Carson. New technologies permit safe abortion at less than six weeks' gestation and provide timely detection of ectopic gestation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 176(5): 1997; 1101–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SG Kaali, GM Csakany, I Szigetvari. Updated screening protocol for abortion services. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 76(1): 1990; 136–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ectopic Pregnancy - United States, 1990–1992. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 44: 1995; 46–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D Grossman, C Ellertson, DA Grimes. Routine follow-up visits after first-trimester induced abortion. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 103(4): 2004; 738–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Taylor, AC Hwang. Mifepristone for medical abortion. Exploring a new option for nurse practitioners. Journal of Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses Lifelines. 7(6): 2003/2004; 524–529.
   Google Scholar