Motivation and satisfaction with early medical vs. surgical abortion in the Netherlands

References

• Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Jaarrapportage 2007 van de Wet afbreking zwangerschap. (Annual Report 2007 of the Law on Termination of Pregnancy) Den Haag: IGZ, 2008. p.19.
   Google Scholar
• H Kruijer, L van Lee, C Wijsen. Landelijke abortusregistratie 2008. 2009; Rutgers Nisso Groep: Utrecht, 17.
   Google Scholar
• C Wijsen, J Rademakers. Abortus in Nederland 2001–2002. (Abortion in the Netherlands 2001–2002). 2003; RutgersNissogroep: Utrecht, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Jaarrapportage 2006 van de Wet afbreking zwangerschap. (Annual Report 2006 of the Law on Termination of Pregnancy) Den Haag: IGZ, 2007. p.17.
   Google Scholar
• J Rademakers, E Koster, A Jansen-van Hees. Medical abortion as an alternative for vacuum aspiration: first experiences with the “abortion pill” in the Netherlands. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. 6: 2000; 185–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Hemmerling, F Siedentopf, H Kentenich. Emotional impact and acceptability of medical abortion with mifepristone: a German experience. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 26: 2005; 23–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PC Ho. Women’s perceptions on medical abortion. Contraception. 74: 2006; 111–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RC Henshaw, SA Naji, IT Russell. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment. British Medical Journal. 307: 1993; 714–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Rørbye, M Nørgaard, L Nilas. Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study. Human Reproduction. 20: 2005; 834–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Berer. Medical abortion: a fact sheet. Reproductive Health Matters. 13: 2005; 20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SR Trupin, C Moreno. Medical abortion: overview and management. Medscape General Medicine. 4(1): 2002. At: <www.medscape.com/viewarticle/429755. >. Accessed 4 March 2009.
   Google Scholar
• MD Creinin. Medical abortion for early pregnancy. Current Problems in Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Fertility. 20: 1997; 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Statistik BFS, Switzerland. Statistik des Schwangerschaftsabbruchs, 2007. Anzahl Schwangerschaftsabbrüche stabil und relativ tief. (Statistics of termination of pregnancy 2007. Number of terminations of pregnancy stable and relatively low). At: <www.svss-uspda.ch/pdf/SA-2007-bfs.pdf>. Accessed 22 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks E, Chalmers J, Philip A. Abortion Statistics, Scotland, year ending December 2007. Edinburgh: ISD Scotland Statistical Publication Notice 2008. At: <www.isdscotland.org/isd/5644.html>. Accessed 28 March 2009.
   Google Scholar
• L van Lee, C Wijsen. Landelijke Abortus Registratie 2006 [National Abortion Registry 2006]. 2006; RutgersNissogroep: Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Vilain A. Les interruptions volontaires de grossesse en 2006. (Voluntary terminations of pregnancy in 2006, France) DREES Études et résultats N° 659, Paris, 2008. At: <www.sante.gouv.fr/drees/etude-resultat/er-pdf/er659.pdf>. Accessed 3 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• B Ollars, A Lindam. Induced abortions 2007. Official Statistics of Sweden. Health and Diseases. 4: 2008
   Google Scholar
• Government Statistical Service. Abortion Statistics, England and Wales: 2007. Statistical Bulletin. 1: 2008. At: <www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_085508. >. Accessed 3 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• A Bachelot, L Cludy, A Spira. Conditions for choosing between drug-induced and surgical abortions. Contraception. 45: 1992; 47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winikoff B. Acceptability of medical abortion in early pregnancy. Family Planning Perspectives 1995;27:142–48 &158.
   Google Scholar
• G Pheterson. Avortement pharmacologique ou chirurgical: les critères sociaux du “choix” (Medical versus surgical abortion: social determinants of “choice”). Cahiers du Genre. 31: 2001; 221–247.
   Google Scholar
• RK Jones, MRS Zolna, SK Henshaw. Abortion in the United States: incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 40: 2008; 13–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RK Jones, SK Henshaw. Mifepristone for early medical abortion: experiences in France, Great Britain and Sweden. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 34: 2002; 154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar