Second trimester abortion laws globally: actuality, trends and recommendations

References

• International Conference on Second Trimester Abortion. Conference Report. 29–31 March 2007, London. At: <www.medicalabortionconsortium.org/activities/conference-report-29-31-march-2007-london-uk-5.html>. Accessed 25 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• PA Lohr, JL Hayes, K Gemzell-Danielsson. Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1: 2008; CD006714.At: <http://apps.who.int/rhl/reviews/CD006714.pdf>. Accessed 25 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• South Africa. Department of Health. Termination of pregnancy update: cumulative statistics through 2004. 2005; Department of Health: Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2008. 6th update, 2010 (Forthcoming); WHO: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• S Singh. Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: estimates from 13 developing countries. Lancet. 368: 2006; 1887–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JA Unuigbe, AU Oronsaye, AAE Orhue. Abortion-related morbidity and mortality in Benin City, Nigeria: 1973–1985. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 26(3): 1988; 435–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D Walker, L Campero, H Espinoza. Deaths from complications of unsafe abortion: misclassified second trimester deaths. Reproductive Health Matters. 12(24 Suppl): 2004; 27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Berer. Second trimester abortion: public policy, women's health [Editorial]. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008; 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TD Tuyet Hoang, Phan Thuy, NK Trang Huynh. Second trimester abortion in Viet Nam: changing to recommended methods and improving service delivery. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008; 145–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Ingham, E Lee, SJ Clements. Reasons for second trimester abortions in England and Wales. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008; 18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MB Ustá, EMH Mitchell, H Gebreselassie. Who is excluded when abortion access is restricted to twelve weeks?: evidence from Maputo, Mozambique. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008; 14–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L Font-Ribera, G Pérez, A Espelt. Determinants of induced abortion delay. Gaceta sanitaria / S.E.S.P.A.S. 23(5): 2009; 415–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O Loeber, C Wijsen. Factors influencing the percentage of second trimester abortions in the Netherlands. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl): 2008; 30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Harries, P Orner, M Gabriel. Delays in seeking an abortion until the second trimester: a qualitative study in South Africa. Reproductive Health. 4: 2007; 7.At: <www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2039724/>. Accessed 14 May 2010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EA Drey, DG Foster, RA Jackson. Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 107(1): 2006; 128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MF Gallo, NC Nghia. Real life is different: a qualitative study of why women delay abortion until the second trimester in Vietnam. Social Science & Medicine. 64(9): 2007; 1812–1822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2003; WHO: Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• D Singh, JR Singh, V Kumar. Prenatal diagnosis for congenital malformations and genetic disorders. Emedicine. 2008. At: <http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1200683-overview>. Accessed 25 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• RD Wilson. Amended Canadian guideline for prenatal diagnosis (2005): change to 2005-techniques for prenatal diagnosis. JOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines. 168: 2005. At: <www.sogc.org/guidelines/public/168E-CPG-November2005.pdf>. Accessed 25 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• R Boland, L Katzive. Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998–2007. International Family Planning Perspectives. 34(3): 2008; 110–120. At: <www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3411008.html>. Accessed 25 February 2010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A Rahman, L Katzive, SK Henshaw. A global review of laws on induced abortion, 1985–1997. International Family Planning Perspectives. 24(2): 1998; 56–64. At: <www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2405698.html>. Accessed 25 February 2010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SK Henshaw. Induced abortion: a world review. Family Planning Perspectives. 22: 1990; 76–89. At: <www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/2405698.html>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RJ Cook, BM Dickens. Issues in Reproductive Health Law in the Commonwealth. 1986; Commonwealth Secretariat: London.
   Google Scholar
• RJ Cook, BM Dickens. Emerging Issues in Commonwealth Abortion Laws. 1982; Commonwealth Secretariat: London.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Division. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Abortion policies: a global review. 2002; UN: New YorkAt: <www.un.org/esa/population/publications/abortion/index.htm>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights. The world's abortion laws 2008, poster. 2007; CRR: New YorkAt: <http://reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/pub_fac_abortionlaws2008.pdf>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• RAS Morhee, ESK Morhee. Overview of the law and availability of abortion services in Ghana. Ghana Medical Journal. 40(3): 2006; 80–86. At: <www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1790853/>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• I Seri, J Evans. Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. Journal of Perinatology. 28: 2008; S4–S8. At: <www.nature.com/jp/journal/v28/n1s/full/jp200842a.html>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Scientific developments relating to the Abortion Act 1967, 12th report of session 2006-07, Vol. 1 (HC 1045-1). September 2007. At: <www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmsctech/1045/1045i.pdf>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. Fetal viability: a briefing paper from the BMA. 2005. At: <www.bma.org.uk/ethics/reproduction_genetics/AbortionTimeLimits.jsp?page=6>. Accessed 15 August 2010
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Fetal awareness: review of research and recommendations for practice. 2010; RCOG: London.
   Google Scholar
• Pro-Choice Forum. Late abortion: a review of the evidence. A briefing. 2008; Pro-Choice Forum: CanterburyAt: <www.prochoiceforum.org.uk/pdf/PCF_late_abortion08.pdf>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• A Ortega Ortiz. Review of: Causal salud: interrupción legal de embarazo, ética y derechos humanos. Bogotá: FLASOG; 2008. Reproductive Health Matters. 17(33): 2009; 181–182.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Constitution, 22 July 1946, Preamble. At: <www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• Annual Review of Population Law. Abortion Laws of the World. At: <www.hsph.harvard.edu/population/abortion/abortionlaws.htm>. Accessed 26 February 2010
   Google Scholar
• C Zampas, JM Gher. Abortion as a human right: international and regionsl standards. Human Rights Review. 8(2): 2008; 249–294.
   Google Scholar
• RJ Cook, B Dickens. Human rights and abortion laws. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 65: 1999; 81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipas. Human rights, unwanted pregnancy and abortion-related care: reference information and illustrative cases. 2002. At: <www.ipas.org/Publications/asset_upload_file568_2443.pdf>. Accessed 15 August 2010
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Human Rights Committee. KL v. Peru. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands. Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport. [Termination of life neonates] (Parliamentary document). 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales: report of a working party. 2010; RCOG: London.
   Google Scholar
• E Díaz Amado, MC Calderón García, K Romero Cristancho. Obstacles and challenges following the partial decriminalisation of abortion in Colombia. Reproductive Health Matters. 18(36): 2010; 118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G Sedgh, S Henshaw, S Singh. Induced abortion: rates and trends worldwide. Lancet. 370: 2007; 1338–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SK Henshaw, S Singh, T Haas. The incidence of abortion worldwide. International Family Planning Perspectives. 25(Suppl.): 1999; S30–S38.
   Google Scholar
• Canada. Supreme Court. R. v. Morgenthaler. 1988.
   Google Scholar
• M Berer. Provision of abortion by mid-level providers: international policy, practice and perspectives. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 87: 2009; 58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Information for health care providers. Information Package on Medical Abortion. International Consortium for Medical Abortion website. At: <www.medicalabortionconsortium.org/articles/for-health-care-providers/health/?bl=en>. Accessed 21 August 2010
   Google Scholar
• RJ Cook, BM Dickens. The scope and limits of conscientious objection. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 71: 2000; 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics. The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine (Opinion No. 385). 2007. At: <www.acog.org/from_home/publications/ethics/co385.pdf>. Accessed 14 August 2010
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Gynecology & Obstetrics. Resolution on “Conscientious Objection.” 2006. At: <www.figo.org/projects/conscientious>. Accessed 14 August 2010
   Google Scholar
• L Casas. Invoking conscientious objection in reproductive health care: evolving issues in Peru, Mexico and Chile. Reproductive Health Matters. 17(34): 2009; 78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Reproductive Rights. Defending human rights: abortion providers facing threats, restrictions, and harassment. 2009; Center for Reproductive Rights: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gynuity Health Projects. Mifepristone approval. At: <http://gynuity.org/resources/info/list-of-mifepristone-approval/>. Accessed 12 August 2010
   Google Scholar
• Gynuity Health Projects. Misoprostol approved. At: <http://gynuity.org/resources/info/map-of-misoprostol-approval/>. Accessed 12 August 2010
   Google Scholar
• T Parfitt. Russia moves to curb abortion rates. Lancet. 362(1988): 2003; 968.
   Google Scholar
• United States Supreme Court. Gonzales v. Carhart, Case No. 05-380. 2007. At: <www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-380.pdf>. Accessed 12 August 2008
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Second Trimester Abortion. Recommendations, 29–31 March 2007. Reproductive Health Matters. 16(31 Suppl.): 2008; 205–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Planned Parenthood Federation. Western Hemisphere Region. Legal abortion: a comparative analysis of health regulations. 2009. At: <www.ippfwhr.org/sites/default/files/Legal_Abortion.pdf>. Accessed 14 August 2010
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization. International technical guidance on sexuality education: an evidence-informed approach for schools, teachers and health educators. 2009; UNESCO: Paris.
   Google Scholar